Young Adult Books and Censorship

Start Free Trial

At Issue

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

The landscape of children's literature has evolved significantly since its inception, where early texts catered predominantly to the educational needs of the upper class. In the days before the fifteenth century’s advent of movable type, children’s books were primarily Latin lesson books. These early works were steeped in the tradition of moral instruction, reflecting an educational ethos that sought to instill ethical values and societal norms from a young age.

Historical Antecedents

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

The advent of movable type revolutionized literacy, drastically altering societal perceptions of education and literature. As literacy spread, the burgeoning middle class became increasingly invested in the education of their children, leading to a clear demarcation between literature intended for adults and that for children. In colonial America, this trend was deeply influenced by the Puritans, who viewed the moral upbringing of their children as a critical parental duty. Consequently, children's literature of the time was predominantly religious and moralistic, reflecting the Puritan ethos.

The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries saw a gradual evolution of this strict literary separation. Some books began to appeal to both adult and younger audiences, characterized by works like Daniel Defoe’s The Life and Strange Surprising Adventures of Robinson Crusoe (1719) and Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels (1726). These titles, transcending the age boundaries of their time, introduced elements of adventure and fantasy that captivated readers both young and old. In 1744, a pivotal development occurred when John Newbery commenced the publication of books specifically for children, crafted to entertain rather than instruct. Among these was the didactic yet entertaining Little Goody Two-Shoes (1765), marking one of the first entries into what could be considered the realm of juvenile novels.

As the nineteenth century unfolded, societal views of children began to morph. Children were seen as innocent beings, free from the duplicity often attributed to adulthood. This shift was mirrored in the literature of the time, with enduring classics such as Louisa May Alcott’s Little Women (1867) and Lewis Carroll’s Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland (1865) gaining popularity. These stories stood in contrast to the domestic novels of the era, which were predominantly directed at older girls and women, promoting conventional social values. Boys and men, on the other hand, gravitated toward dime novels, filled with improbable adventures and rugged protagonists. Such books often drew criticism from clergy, educators, and parents, who viewed them with suspicion.

By the end of the nineteenth century, the literary landscape for young readers was distinctly defined, with clear separations between classics and nonclassics, as well as between literature aimed at boys versus girls. Despite these classifications, many works targeting young audiences faced scrutiny and censorship from adult figures, a testament to ongoing concerns over the cultural and moral implications of literature aimed at children and adolescents.

Who Challenges Young Adult Books

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

The landscape of young adult literature has long been a battleground for various groups seeking to assert their moral or ideological stances. Since the 1960s, conservative religious groups, particularly those rooted in Protestant Christianity, have been vocal in their criticism of public schools and their literature selections. These groups hold the Bible as the ultimate authority and view salvation as solely attainable through belief in Christ. Their critiques are often framed around the notion that educators are diluting academic rigor while promoting lifestyles and values that contradict Christian teachings. This opposition frequently targets what they describe as "secular humanism" in literature, a term they use to criticize texts perceived as undermining God, Christianity, and patriotism. Works alleged to promote New Age religion, which they claim encourages a belief in self-redemption over theism, are particularly contentious.

Fantasy literature often bears the brunt of these accusations due to its use of witches, fairies, and mythical creatures. For instance, Katherine Paterson’s Bridge to Terabithia has faced challenges for its inclusion of New Age elements and perceived improper references to God. Similarly, Roald Dahl’s The Witches, a beloved story among children, has been controversially accused of promoting witchcraft and Satanism.

However, the push for censorship is not solely the domain of religious conservatives. Radical and feminist activists have also voiced opposition to certain young adult books. This illustrates that challenges can arise from the political Left as well. In LaGrange, Kentucky, some Wiccans have objected to The Witches for portraying witches negatively, while in Louisville, Kentucky, a parent protested Judy Blume’s Blubber for its inclusion of racial slurs used by characters. These challenges underscore the nuanced debates around racism and sexism in literature, highlighting the subjective nature of what is deemed offensive or harmful. The ongoing controversies surrounding classics like Adventures of Huckleberry Finn further exemplify these complexities.

Defenders of Young Adult Books

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

The landscape of young adult literature in schools has been shaped by pivotal judicial decisions over the years, reflecting a tug-of-war between the rights of students and the authority of school administrations. A landmark moment in student rights was the 1969 Supreme Court ruling in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, which recognized that students and teachers retain their constitutional rights within the educational setting. This victory was echoed in the early 1970s with the Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District v. Pico case, where the Court acknowledged that the removal of certain young adult books from a school library was a violation of First Amendment rights.

However, the momentum seemed to shift during the 1980s with the Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier decision in 1988. This ruling granted school administrators considerable authority to make curricular decisions, ostensibly prioritizing the educational mission over the unrestricted access to diverse literature. As these legal frameworks evolved, the role of language arts teachers became increasingly vital in navigating the challenges posed by censorship.

Language arts educators have responded to these challenges by crafting well-founded rationales for the inclusion of specific books in their curriculum. Their efforts are supported by a commitment to academic freedom and engagement with community stakeholders about the literature they teach. To further strengthen their position, schools implement formal policies to manage challenges to young adult books, ensuring a structured approach to potential disputes.

National professional organizations stand as staunch allies in the fight against censorship. Groups such as the American Library Association, the National Council of Teachers of English, and the International Reading Association champion the cause of intellectual freedom. They provide robust support through resources like the Support for the Learning and Teaching of English (SLATE) and the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE), which offer detailed rationales for both teaching English and the inclusion of frequently challenged young adult books. These organizations play a crucial role in preserving the diverse array of voices and stories accessible to young readers, underscoring the importance of protecting students' rights to explore, question, and learn through literature.

Loading...