Larry Gara (essay date 1969)
SOURCE: “Introduction,” in The Narrative of William W. Brown, A Fugitive Slave, and a Lecture Delivered Before the Female Anti-Slavery Society of Salem, 1847, Houghton Mifflin Company, 1969, pp. ix-xvii.
[In the following introduction, Gara presents an overview of Brown's life and explains that many elements of his philosophy can be found in modern Black Nationalism.]
“It is a terrible picture of slavery,” commented Edmund Quincy about William Wells Brown's newly written manuscript, “told with great simplicity. … There is no attempt at fine writing, but only a minute account of scenes and things he saw and suffered, told with a good deal of skill, propriety and delicacy.” Quincy was an abolitionist editor and the son of Harvard's president. When Brown asked him to read the manuscript, he intended only to glance at a few pages, but found it so good he could not put it down until interrupted by a call to dinner. He readily agreed to write a letter to be prefixed to the book, and suggested to the author only “one or two alterations and additions.”1
Brown's narrative quickly became a best seller and took its place with the memoirs of Frederick Douglass, Moses Roper and other former slaves whose writings contributed to the growing antislavery sentiment in the northern states. Whatever their literary merits, the works of ex-slaves had the ring of authenticity. Unlike the white abolitionists, these men could not be accused of speaking without knowledge and experience of the South's “peculiar institution.” A contemporary writer said of the slave narratives that they were “calculated to exert a very wide influence on public opinion” because they contained “the victim's account of the workings of this great institution.”2 An abolitionist editor saw in them an “infallible means of abolitionizing” the North. “Argument provokes argument,” he said, “reason is met by sophistry; but narratives of slaves go right to the hearts of men.”3
For William Wells Brown, born a slave in Kentucky around 1816, publication of his memoir brought fame and probably some monetary compensation. The first edition of a thousand hardbound and two thousand paperbound copies cost him less than eleven cents a copy, and it was quickly out of print.4 Within two years he sold out four editions totalling eight thousand copies.5 With its personal approach and vivid pictures of slave life, Brown's narrative quickly found a receptive audience. In addition to the American versions, it was translated into several foreign languages and circulated in European editions. The book was only the first of a notable series of literary productions from Brown's pen. In 1848 he published a short anthology of antislavery songs, The Anti-Slavery Harp, and in 1852 his travel book, Three Years in Europe, appeared in London and Edinburgh. The following year he published a novel, Clotel, or the President's Daughter, whose main character was an alleged mulatto child of Thomas Jefferson. Though it could not compete successfully with Uncle Tom's Cabin, it was one of the first novels published by an American Negro, and as such was a significant work. Brown wrote several dramas about slave life and published one in 1858: The Escape; or, a Leap for Freedom. In The Black Man, His Antecedents, His Genius, and His Achievements Brown traced Negro history back to its African origins and included short biographical sketches of notable colored persons. Other writings included The Negro in the Rebellion, and several historical volumes expanding on the material first presented in The Black Man. The number of his publications is impressive and contemporary critics were nearly unanimous in praising their quality.
It is the second, or 1848, edition of Brown's memoir which is reprinted in this volume. He made very few changes from the first edition, but he added several appendices and this new edition contains as well a transcript of a speech he made in November, 1847 to the Female Anti-Slavery Society of Salem, Massachusetts. The narrative was written thirteen years after Brown's escape from slavery and reflects, therefore, both the conditioning of his long contact with abolitionists and the vagaries of detail implicit in writing from distant memory. Nevertheless, it is full of insights about slavery and the antebellum South which only a former slave could know. Furthermore it is important both because of the impact it had on thousands of readers and because of the wealth of material it contains.6
Even before publishing his narrative William Wells Brown was known as an effective antislavery speaker, one of a number of former slaves whose message reached many northerners untouched by the white abolitionist crusader.7 In his talks Brown emphasized the terrible injustice of slavery as an institution which deprived individuals of their humanity, and he also included impressive eye-witness accounts of the cruelties which were sometimes practiced in the South. His lectures were well written and eloquently delivered, and he often drew large audiences both in America and in Great Britain, where he sometimes appeared in company with William and Ellen Craft, a famous fugitive slave couple from Georgia. Brown's lectures were occasionally illustrated with his own panorama of slavery, and after he wrote his antislavery plays he often substituted a dramatic reading for the usual lecture. In 1857 William Lloyd Garrison attended one of Brown's readings in Philadelphia and he reported it was “well delivered and well received” though the audience on that occasion was disappointingly small.8 A Vermont reporter commented that Brown held an audience breathless for nearly two hours with his wit and speaking ability. “His dignity of manner, his propriety of expression were more than we had expected to see in one who had spent the early part of his life as a slave,” he commented.9 A New York reporter found one of Brown's dramas, “in itself, a masterly refutation of all apologies for slavery, and it abounds in wit, satire, philosophy, arguments and facts. …”10 Although early in Brown's career antagonistic mobs sometimes interrupted his meetings, for the most part he was greeted with enthusiasm. He continued to give lectures on Negro history after the Civil War ended slavery. In 1868 the New York Evening Post described one of his historical lectures as “intensely interesting” and an “able and manly vindication of his race from the charge of natural inferiority.”11
Unlike Frederick Douglass, his more famous contemporary, Brown never broke with William Lloyd Garrison and the moral suasion school of abolitionists, though their reactions to him and his contribution varied considerably. “It is a long time since I have seen a man, white or black, that I have cottoned to so much as Brown, on so short an acquaintance,” said Edmund Quincy. Brown, he said, was an “extraordinary fellow,” with “no meanness, littleness, no envy or suspiciousness about him.”12 An English abolitionist reported to Garrison that a whispering campaign regarding Brown's personal life involving an alleged love affair was wholly without foundation...
(The entire section is 3026 words.)