Absurdity
The word "absurd," which literally translates to "out of harmony," was utilized by existentialist Albert Camus to describe the situation of modern individuals whose lives appear meaningless as they navigate through an indifferent universe. Virginia Woolf examines the effects on people when they can no longer depend on the illusions that once gave their lives meaning. The theme of absurdity often surfaces in Albee's plays, highlighted by frequent references to the theatre of the absurd in analyses of his work. Albee describes absurdity as "man's struggle to find meaning in a senseless world, where the moral, religious, political, and social structures he created to fool himself have collapsed." A powerful example of life's absurdity is captured in George's speech early in the second act, where he concludes that despite all efforts to construct a civilization, when the final moment arrives, amidst the "sensible sound of men building," the message to humanity will be, simply: "Up yours."
American Dream
Albee's early works offer a critical perspective on the optimism and conformity prevalent in the 1950s, as well as the materialistic values that flourished in America during the economic expansion following World War II. His play, The American Dream, as the title implies, tackles this theme head-on. In Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, Albee further critiques the ideals meant to imbue life in Western civilization with meaning. The deliberate historical reference to George and Martha Washington underscores the play's examination of the myths and self-delusions that Albee identifies as part of American mythology. The deterioration of the American Dream, alongside the nation's decline, is a recurring motif in Virginia Woolf. George observes: "We drink a great deal in this country, and I suspect we'll be drinking a great deal more, too ... if we survive."
Fear
The title itself highlights fear as a key theme in the play. Martha's admission of being afraid of "Virginia Woolf" at the play's conclusion represents a profound human fear of life's lack of inherent meaning. To genuinely feel fear, one must let go of the illusions that once appeared to give life purpose. The play illustrates Martha's fear, along with George's, which he quietly acknowledges, as a process that affirms life. It implies that facing and overcoming fear is better than living a falsehood.
Revenge
The urge for revenge strongly influences George and Martha's actions. They are both perpetually on the lookout to retaliate against past perceived slights or insults. George's choice to "kill" their fictional son is a deliberate move, intended as the ultimate revenge for numerous public and private humiliations, especially Martha's violation of a crucial rule in their relationship by bringing up the son to Honey. In the end, though, this act of "killing" the son is more of an empathetic gesture, an essential step to free both George and Martha from their destructive illusion.
Science and Technology
The play hints at a broad trend toward impotence and depersonalization in the declining Western world. George, a historian and humanist, blames this on scientific advancements. He imagines a dystopian future, forming the basis for his criticisms of Nick, the biologist. Through genetic engineering, "All imbalances will be corrected, sifted out.... We will have a race of men... test-tube bred... incubator-born... superb and sublime... But! Everyone will tend to be rather the same.... Alike." Whether George's perspective is consistently reflected in the play is open to interpretation. However, as American culture at the time was becoming more uniform due to technological innovations like television, which established standards for looks and conduct, Albee's resistance to this trend is clear in his work.
Truth and Falsehood
Martha challenges George by saying, "Truth and illusion ... you don't know...
(This entire section contains 184 words.)
Unlock this Study Guide Now
Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
the difference," to which he replies, "No; but we must carry on as though we did." The evolution of these characters throughout the play centers on their attempts to stop "carrying on" and confront deceptions at various levels, hoping to reveal the truth. In this process, many profound secrets come to light, compelling the characters to confront the consequences. The primary "exorcism" in the play is the revelation of Martha and George's fictitious son, but there are several other intense encounters with past and present realities. These include Nick's confession of his materialistic motives for marrying Honey, Honey's apprehension about having a child, and George's remorse over his parents' accidental deaths. At one moment, George muses on his relationship with Martha, stating, "accommodation, malleability, adjustment... those do seem to be in the order of things, don't they?" Throughout the play, characters undergo the arduous task of peeling away layers of pretense and artifice. The play suggests that even at an individual's core, damaging illusions exist, and the torment of losing them is overpowering.