Critical Evaluation
The fifth of Herman Melville’s novels dealing with his travels around the world—on board a merchant ship, a whaler, and finally, a U.S. frigate—White-Jacket immediately precedes his greatest work, Moby Dick (1851). Critics usually group Redburn (1849), White-Jacket, and Moby Dick together because of their thematic similarities dealing with initiation, isolation, and communal relationships.
Melville was not the first author to use an extended sailing experience as the setting for a novel, but he was the first to publish a poetic, philosophic, maritime novel. Only the later works of Joseph Conrad rival this accomplishment. Several critics believe this work should not be identified as a novel. The many parts of the work—vivid characterizations, harsh depictions of punishment at sea, descriptions of scenes, information about the various divisions of labor, and the account of the daily experience aboard the closed world of a vessel at sea for many years—are insights and information about life at sea rather than incidents in a conventional plot. Although there is a protagonist, the author, by not giving this protagonist a Christian name or surname, seems to warn the reader not to expect conventional character development. Instead, Melville emphasizes his protagonist’s symbolic significance by identifying the protagonist with his wearing apparel and calling both him and the work White-Jacket.
The title is significant because “white” identifies the fictional persona as a novice on board a man-of-war. It also calls attention to the fact that the protagonist, different in appearance from all the other men on board, who wear navy pea jackets, sees himself as different in character as well, a point he insists on as he relates his maritime experiences. White-Jacket believes he is not like the rough, uneducated, sometimes brutal common seamen who have no other professional alternatives, but he is also unlike the educated, overly genteel officers who seek this profession only because it is appropriate for someone in the upper social class. Out of the hundreds on board the Neversink, White-Jacket identifies only with a very select small group: the natural leader, Jack Chase; the poet Lemsford; the reclusive Nord; and his comrades of the maintop—in his estimation, the premier group in this very hierarchical world. Ironically, the narrator’s personal bias toward his own superior value seems to compromise his reiterated criticism that a republican frigate should foster greater equality in its treatment of the crew.
The white jacket also underlines the injustice attendant on the protagonist’s wearing it. The speaker should have received the same clothing as the other men, but he does not. When he improvises this jacket, he asks for dark paint to obliterate the glaring difference of his uniform but is denied the paint on the basis of its scarcity. This unfair, shortsighted decision becomes emblematic of the incompetent and unjust decisions made by the officers and of the suffering of the crew that results. White-Jacket almost loses his life twice because of the jacket: when the superstitious sailors suddenly lower the halyards and he nearly falls to his death from the main royal yard, and later when the jacket becomes entangled about his head while he is working and causes him to fall from the yardarm into the sea.
The protagonist sheds his white jacket as he approaches the United States, an action emblematic of his departure from a deceptive, artificial life. The action of shedding his jacket provides the only suggestion that some change takes place in the protagonist. Some critics call this change a maturing in a novel of initiation; however, shedding what makes him different and what is a symbol of...
(This entire section contains 915 words.)
Unlock this Study Guide Now
Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
injustice and superstition is perhaps only an external sign that the fictional persona leaving the frigate no longer has to protect his individuality or fear the injustice experienced on board the frigate.
Melville chiefly uses the perceptions of White-Jacket to filter the extensive amount of information he supplies about every aspect of life on board this man-of-war, from the physical description of the various parts of the ship to the daily activities of the crew and officers. White-Jacket not only reports the complicated procedures of daily life but also contains several melodramatic scenes to support the narrator’s criticism of the Navy: the use of flogging as a punishment for crimes ranging from the narrator’s failure to know his battle station to an older seaman’s refusal to shave his beard; the ship’s surgeon’s needless amputation of a seaman’s leg; the illegal smuggling activities practiced by the ship’s chief police officer, master-at-arms Bland; and the captain’s inept command that almost costs the lives of hundreds of men who know better than the captain how to handle the capricious storms haunting Cape Horn.
Because the chapters are much like informative essays, the philosophical perspective of the narrator is needed to provide unity. The order of the work, with its occasional melodramatic and stormy scenes, parallels the apparent order on a ship that masks the inefficiency, sadism, and brutality of its members. The subtitle, The World in a Man-of-War, explicitly identifies the author’s theme: Life on board this ship is a microcosm of the real world. The close quarters and enforced confinement highlight and intensify human characteristics of good and evil that are more easily hidden in the constantly changing variables of urban or rural life. Melville’s attacks on the inhumane and unjust conditions existing in the Navy also express his criticism of humanity itself.