As it depicts “the love that dare not speak its name,” The Well of Loneliness clearly portrays the isolation, condemnation, and struggle of lesbian life as it was in the recent past and unfortunately remains in some pockets of contemporary society. In so doing, however, it gives a dignity to lesbian relationships, showing the suffering and sacrifices made in the effort to find and give love. Although the writing has the tenor of other late Victorian novels, with its detailed pastoral scenes, attribution of human insights and emotions to animals, and vagueness and delicacy with regard to sex, its controversial subject matter marks it as on the cusp of modernity. The pain and angst of its heroine has an existential quality that resonates with the struggle for meaning and identity that is often thematized in the modern novel.
Not once in the novel does Radclyffe Hall use the word “lesbian,” and rarely does she use the medical term often employed by early sexologists: “invert.” Instead, through her descriptions of the young Stephen’s oddness, boyishness, and disdain for traditionally feminine clothing and pursuits, the writer evokes her heroine’s lesbianism. While Stephen’s strong sense of honor, her religious faith, and her respect for the land and traditions of Morton establish her as a strong and sympathetic character, the author’s reluctance to name Stephen’s “condition,” to say “what” she is, creates the dramatic tension that enables the reader to identify Stephen. More specifically, both Sir Philip and Puddle refuse to tell Stephen what she is. This refusal replays within the novel the tension between naming and suspicion which marks the reader’s relationship to the author. Like Stephen, the reader suspects that a certain difference and abnormality is afoot, but is left to pull the pieces together.
Just as the avoidance of naming...
(The entire section is 777 words.)