Analysis
In “We Real Cool,” Brooks uses a variety of innovative and unusual literary devices in order to convey the sense of camaraderie that defines the narrative voice. Written with an internal rhyme structure and made up of irregularly written formal couplets, the poem switches from a detached speaker, who conveys the poem’s first two lines, to the group perspective of the pool players, whose voice conveys the majority of the poem. The poem’s final statement—“We / Die soon”—can be read as a return to the initial detached speaker, although the phrase is ambiguous.
The poem’s subtitle forms a couplet, two complete sentences which together constitute a stanza. These lines are devoid of personal voice, and they quickly set the scene and inform the reader who “We” is referring to in the rest of the poem. These lines are factual and visual, refraining from providing any unnecessary information and suggesting that the “Pool Players” frequently visit “the Golden Shovel.” By avoiding individuality and grouping the players together, Brooks conveys the sense that she is describing the group as a collective and offering a kind of snapshot of their lives.
Brooks rejects a judgmental stance, instead conveying what the group of boys might feel. In doing so, she subverts the traditional lyric form, which typically conveys a singular voice and experience. Instead, the repeated use of “We” as the poem’s subject groups the pool players together as a single, united entity.
“We Real Cool” is seen as a foremost example of “jazz poetry,” employing rhythmic structures reminiscent of jazz music. The clearest example of this is in Brooks’s use of enjambment, wherein sentences start on one line and end on another. Every line except the last ends in “We,” which always forms the beginning of the next phrase. Brooks herself claimed that she imagined the “We” to be said softly, suggesting a sense of hiding. Each “We” anticipates the next phrase, the next move that the group makes. Brooks’s specific use of enjambment was developed as a poetic form by Terrance Hayes, who coined it as the “Golden Shovel” method in homage to this poem. The poem’s enjambment gives the lines a sense of forward propulsion: The reader, having reached the “We” at the end of a line, rushes onward to discover the group’s subsequent action. The quick, dizzying pace of Brooks’s lines effectively mimic the reckless, youthful pace of the pool players’ lives.
In addition to enjambment, Brooks uses a careful rhyming scheme, along with assonance and alliteration. For example, the third stanza rhymes “sin” and “gin,” each word ending a complete sentence but not the individual line. Alliteration, wherein similar sounds are used for the first syllables of nearby words, can be seen throughout the poem, for example in the phrase “Sing sin.” This not only enriches the internal rhyme structure but also varies the poem’s rhythmic pattern. The phrase “Sing sin” is interesting because it can be difficult to distinguish between the two words, allowing them to run into one another. In contrast, “Strike straight” and “Lurk late,” which also employ alliteration, use harsher k sounds in order to break up syllables and connote harshness.
Due to the poem’s brevity, Brooks does not develop any obvious similes or metaphors, but manages to pack a great deal of symbolism into the text. The proper noun “Golden Shovel” presumably refers to the pool hall in which the group are playing and immediately suggests that the speaker is familiar with the setting. In mentioning the name so nonchalantly, Brooks conveys a feeling of coming across the scene of pool players, watching them...
(This entire section contains 754 words.)
Unlock this Study Guide Now
Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
from an observer’s perspective, and then exploring their inner thoughts.
It is clear that the players conduct their lives according to their own timeline and wants, breaking free from the established societal expectations of education and work. However, despite choosing to live on their own terms, they are not immortal, nor can they live in an endless “June”—they cannot escape death, and the abruptness of the final line suggests that the reality of this possibility is closer than the reader expected. Indeed, whereas the preceding six lines are composed of three syllables, always ending with an anticipatory “We” to signal the start of the next action, the final line ends after two syllables. The absence of the word “We,” an absence that breaks the poem’s formal pattern, symbolizes the actual absence of the players after their premature deaths.
Commentary
Gwendolyn Brooks said this in Report from Part One: “The WEs in 'We Real Cool' are tiny, wispy weakly argumentative 'Kilroy-is-here' announcements. The boys have no accented sense of themselves, yet they are aware of a semi-defined personal importance. Say the 'We' softly.”
These young men should be compared to Jeff, Gene, Geronimo, and Bop in “The Blackstone Rangers,” who were a gang of thirty seen by the “Disciplines” (the police) as “Sores in the city/ that do not want to heal.” Yet despite the police officers’ contempt for the adolescents on Blackstone Street and Helen Vendler’s description of “We Real Cool” as a “judgmental monologue” that “barely conceals its adult reproach of their behavior,” Brooks’s insistence on a soft “We” suggests sympathy for lives at an impasse. The “basic uncertainty” of the “We” reveals no bold swagger but instead an awareness of the plight that circumstances have landed them in and represents a brave assertion that though their lives are short they are somebody too. The poem is an elegy for thousands of young black men whose growth has been stifled by prejudice and its resulting poverty and social confusion.
Placing the “We” at the end of the end-stopped lines results in a gaping hole at the end of the last line, a visual emphasis on the truth of how they “Die soon” and nothing follows. That is all for these truncated lives. The sound effects are conventional alliteration and rhyme. One critic has suggested that “Jazz June” includes a sexual image and that “Die” carries an old Renaissance metaphor for a sexual climax, but this interpretation may strike some readers as strained and out of place.
Bibliography
Brooks, Gwendolyn. Report from Part One. Detroit: Broadside Press, 1972.
Bryant, Jacqueline, ed. Gwendolyn Brooks’ “Maud Martha”: A Critical Collection. Chicago: Third World Press, 2002.
Kent, George E. A Life of Gwendolyn Brooks. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1990.
Lanker, Brian. I Dream a World: Portraits of Black Women Who Changed America. New York: Stewart, Tabori & Chang, 1989.
Madhubuti, Haki R., ed. Say That the River Turns: The Impact of Gwendolyn Brooks. Chicago: Third World Press, 1987.
Melhem, D. H. Gwendolyn Brooks: Poetry and the Heroic Voice. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1987.
Mootry, Maria K., and Gary Smith, eds. A Life Distilled: Gwendolyn Brooks, Her Poetry and Fiction. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1987.
Washington, Mary Helen. “Plain, Black, and Decently Wild: The Heroic Possibilities of Maud Martha.” In The Voyage In: Fictions of Female Development, edited by Elizabeth Abel, Marianne Hirsch, and Elizabeth Langland. Hanover, N.H.: University Press of New England, 1983.
Wright, Stephen Caldwell, ed. On Gwendolyn Brooks: Reliant Conversation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996.