Analysis
Watership Down, winner of the 1973 Carnegie Medal and the 1973 Guardian Award, is a complicated work of fantasy. It is too realistic to fulfill J. R. R. Tolkien’s requirements for an animal fable yet too fantastic to be merely a nature study. Adams’ book is most often assigned to the inappropriate category of “children’s fiction” and has even inspired an animated film, produced in 1978, marketed for children. The grim tale of the flight of a band of rabbits from annihilation, their unnatural and fearful travels in the English countryside, and their colonization of the idyllic Watership Down does not depict life as a children’s book might. It portrays both the hard life that animals face and their usually brutal deaths, in this way more reminiscent of Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring (1962) than traditional animal fantasy.
Another understanding of Adams’ classic comes from the English epic genre, following in the footsteps of Tolkien’s The Hobbit (1937). Like The Hobbit, Watership Down is separated from most other epics by its use of animal heroes. Some scholars deny Watership Down’s epic qualities with the assertions that the primary character, Hazel, is not a hero on the scale of Aeneas or Aragorn and that the book lacks the qualities of heroic prose even within the unconventional genres of fantasy and science fiction. Hazel, named Hazel-rah (Prince Hazel) by his followers, might be...
(The entire section is 428 words.)
