Student Question
Is the narrator in In Watermelon Sugar reliable?
Quick answer:
The surrealism of In Watermelon Sugar makes it hard to make definitive conclusions about the reliability of the narrator. The reader must take him at his word to follow the fantastical twists and turns of the story but also use their own morals to analyze what he is saying.
The reader isn’t given much information about the narrator, so it’s hard to judge whether he is being honest (and therefore reliable). In Watermelon Sugar is a postmodern novel, characterized by its experimental form and the narrator’s acknowledgment that he’s telling a story to an audience. The narrator admits to being mysterious from the beginning of the novel: “I guess you are kind of curious as to who I am, but I am one of those who do not have a regular name. My name depends on you. Just call me whatever is in your mind.” In this passage, he essentially tells the reader that the interpretation of this text is up to them.
The narrator doesn’t try to mislead the reader, but at the same time, this is a completely foreign, fantastical world. We have to take what the narrator says at face value because of the surrealist nature...
Unlock
This Answer NowStart your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
of the text. Questioning him too much makes the plot even more complicated—the events are surreal enough without wondering whether the narrator is being honest.
At the same time, as the modern reader continues through the text with their own sensibilities, the horrors of the story become apparent. The narrator talks about horrific events in a neutral tone, not acknowledging the dark side of iDEATH. When Margaret, his girlfriend, commits suicide, he doesn’t seem to have an emotional reaction. This may be a key sign of his personality and, therefore, his unreliability. His lack of a reaction might point to deeper emotional issues. He also writes about his parents’ death in an unemotional tone, not acknowledging any reaction on his part.
However, Brautigan’s surrealist style has to be considered when thinking about the reliability of the narrator. The world of iDEATH is full of magical realism—talking tigers and fantastical materials (including watermelon sugar itself) that are never explained. The postmodern, playful nature of the work tells the reader they should just go along with whatever ridiculous plot twists occur. In the end, the reader can rely on the narrator’s story but must also make their own conclusions about the deeper significance of the events he talks about. A postmodern story often experiments with deeper symbolism, and it is up to the reader to decide on their own takeaway.
References