How is "The Waste Land" by T.S Eliot representative of modern poetry?

Quick answer:

"The Waste Land" by T.S Eliot exemplifies modern poetry through its use of free verse, lack of a linear narrative, and a multitude of allusions ranging from classical literature to nursery rhymes. The poem's fragmented style, tone and content reflect the literary movement of modernism. Its obscurity and elitist style resist the rise of the common man, a key feature of modernity. Eliot's work also references classical texts, but with a modern spin, embodying Ezra Pound's motto "make it new."

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

"The Waste Land" is a modern poem and also a Modernist one. While Modernism was a distinct literary movement, of which T.S. Eliot was one of the leading figures, the word "modern" appears at first sight to refer to nothing but the date of composition. It is possible to describe "The Waste Land" as a modern poem simply because it was written in the twentieth century. It has, however, other attributes of modernity which overlap with Modernism but may, at any rate, be described as "modern" as well as being "Modernist."

"The Waste Land" is written, like the majority of modern poetry, in free verse. Although it is a long poem, and has some points in common with epic, it is clearly not an epic poem in the same sense as Paradise Lost or even the Idylls of the King. It has no hero and no linear narrative. The poem is also highly allusive, and its allusions cover a very wide range, from classical and medieval literature to nursery rhymes.

The above stylistic points are common to modernity and literary Modernism, but Modernism has a conflicted relationship with modernity, nowhere more so than in "The Waste Land." There are glancing references to aristocrats and heroes in the poem, but there are just as many allusions to more modern figures, "Mr. Eugenides, the Smyrna merchant," and the silk-hatted "Bradford millionaire." Most of all there are the crowds swarming over London Bridge. Eliot regards modernity as the age of the common man but, being an elitist, he does not much like this. He therefore uses a highly obscure and allusive Modernist style as a form of resistance to modernity; he writes about the rise of the common man in a way that no common man could understand.

Approved by eNotes Editorial
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

"The Waste Land" by T. S. Eliot is one of the touchstones of modern poetry; it may even be the most widely-known modern poem. Its style and content both reflect the literary movement of modernism. A few features that I will focus on in my answer are fragmented style, allusions, and tone. 

First of all, modernist literature is known for its fragmented forms. The modernists tended to break from traditional forms of writing and invent new forms or, at the very least, break or fragment more common forms. "The Waste Land" is a long poem made of five titled sections. Within these sections, there is no consistent rhyme scheme or meter, so we can refer to this style as free verse. The sections are not consistent in terms of length, either. In other words, there is not a set form. Many modernist works focus on psychology or the inner world of characters or speakers rather than traditional narrative. We could not call "The Waste Land" a narrative or story in the traditional sense.

Allusions are an interesting feature of modernist literary works because the modernists believed in Ezra Pound's motto "make it new." So, you might ask how referring to older works of literature or to the Bible or mythology could be in any way new. Eliot is probably the modernist poet who most references classical texts in his work, and many readers need either a very experienced background in literature or some detailed footnotes to get through his works, especially "The Waste Land." One way to look at this conundrum is to think that in order for writers to break with the old and "make it new," they have to first know their literary history. Eliot certainly knows his. We can see in his varied and numerous references to classical Greek myth and tragedy (Tiresias in Part III), to Shakespeare, to Carthage and Phoenicia, and so on, that Eliot is well-versed in the classics. He does, however, put a modern spin on these texts through his allusions. Take the allusion to Tiresias, for example: Tiresias, the blind prophet from the ancient Greek tragedy Oedipus Rex, is described as an androgynous figure who can "see" into the dissatisfied and dingy lives of modern Londoners. It almost seems like a "waste" of the prophet's powers: what is there to observe here?

Finally, the tone of the poem is consistent with the mood of the modernist era. After World War I, Europeans certainly lost faith in some of the more solid and reliable facts of their world. It felt as though their world fell apart in a sense. How does one go on after that kind of loss and trauma? Eliot begins the poem with the famous line, "April is the cruellest month . . ." and that is our first clue, along with the title, that the poem will be dark and dour. We normally associate springtime with rebirth, happiness, fresh starts, and beautiful scenery. Here, Eliot subverts that expectation in a way that reflects the modernists' perspective on the post-World War I world.

Approved by eNotes Editorial
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

I gave a brief description of some of the key points of modern poetry in your "Love Song for J. Alfred Prufrock" question, but just to recap on the most significant highlights that would correspond with T.S. Eliot's The Waste Land:

Breaking the rules or conventions of more traditional, accepted forms of poetry:

The Waste Land veers in and out of different languages (German, French, even Hindi, to name a few) and obscure mythological references without clear focus or easily defined theme, without defined meter or form.  Eliot's enormously long poem does not fit any traditional structure, and in doing so, Eliot set the standard for modern poetry. 

Themes of Fear, Alienation, City Life, War, Ennui, Death

Alienation and the desolation of war are predominant themes in The Waste Land; Eliot originally writes this poem after he suffers a mental breakdown at his bank manager job in London; he felt keenly the destruction and decay of World War I and mourned the loss of innocence and spirituality.  He pours those feelings into The Waste Land, and the resulting poem is a dark journey through a broken, devastated kingdom, the perfect metaphor for post-WWI Europe.

The whole first section of the poem, "Burial of the Dead," is thick with references to death and a feeling of imprisonment or being trapped.  Multiple allusions to WWI and Germany lurk throughout, from references to Starnbergersee (in Germany) to including actual phrases written in German; Eliot's poem reminds readers of WWI and the bitter price of war:

"Under the brown fog of a winter dawn,
A crowd flowed over London Bridge, so many,
I had not thought death had undone so many" (61-63).

Approved by eNotes Editorial
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Discuss The Waste Land, by T S Eliot, as a poem about twentieth-century concerns.

T S Eliot makes no attempt to simplify his poetry and expects the reader to approach it with an open mind. The Waste Land is typical of his style and his intention to introduce the reader to a reality that reflects the turmoil after World War I. A sense of despair and disillusionment pervades The Waste Land as Eliot wants to ensure that the reader is aware of the reality of life in the twentieth century.

Water is the source of life and  where there is “no sound of water” there can be no future. Basic human functions and the emergence of gender equality also feature heavily as men and women find no pleasure in sexual activity. It is important to note how this fact transcends the class system - also a very prominent feature of the early twentieth century. Rich and poor are affected by this morally baseless sex. Meaningful encounters are scarce and life has become a series of "automatic" actions. The lack of maternal instinct is stark as one woman is "Hardly aware of her departed lover” and another woman would rather have abortions - strictly forbidden - because she  “nearly died of young George.” To treat the creation of life so flippantly is a warning that the masses, after World War I are disenchanted and defeated.   

Although ultimately people are striving to overcome their negativity, they are not strong enough to do so and any attempt at revealing hope and the restorative qualities contrary to the disillusionment are disregarded as "I was neither / Living nor dead, and I knew nothing.” Even the redeeming concept of the resurrection of Christ is somehow minimized because, for all the hope it brings, it also highlights desperation and betrayal. Christ's own followers failed to recognize him after the Resurrection so, whilst Christ can provide the ultimate saving grace, so too can disillusionment creep up and envelop the reader.  

See eNotes Ad-Free

Start your 48-hour free trial to get access to more than 30,000 additional guides and more than 350,000 Homework Help questions answered by our experts.

Get 48 Hours Free Access
Last Updated on