War Without Mercy

by John W. Dower

Start Free Trial

Discussion Topic

The argument and main point of "War Without Mercy" by Dower

Summary:

The main argument of War Without Mercy by John W. Dower is that racial prejudices and stereotypes significantly influenced the conduct and perception of the Pacific War between the United States and Japan. Dower examines how both nations dehumanized each other, which fueled brutal warfare and shaped post-war attitudes and policies.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

What is the main point of War Without Mercy?

World War II was the realization of unprecedented levels of destruction. That much has long been established by witnesses and thousands of history books published in the ensuing years. Many of those history books adequately described the scale and intensity of the many battles that comprised the war in both Europe and Asia, and many of those histories devote substantial time to the role of racism and anti-Semitism in the origins of the war in the European theater, mainly the ideology of the National Socialist Party of Germany, the Nazis. Far less prevalent has been discussion of the role of racial animosity in the prosecution of the war against Imperial Japan. As John Dower illuminated in War Without Mercy : Race and Power in the Pacific War, racism on the parts of the United States and Japan both contributed significantly to the ferocity of the battles and to the efforts...

Unlock
This Answer Now

Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

on the part of both nations to defeat the other. The dehumanizing nature of racism, Dower argues, made more possible than otherwise might have been the case the willingness of each side to destroy the other.

War Without Mercy is divided into three main parts. The first part focuses on racism in a general context and the means employed by governments to dehumanize the enemy so as to better justify its destruction. Sections two and three, however, provide the heart of the narrative. Part II: “The War in Western Eyes” discusses, as the title suggests, the use of propaganda to help inspire a national war effort. Racist depictions of Japanese set against a backdrop of the destruction from the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor (and the concurrent Japanese invasion of the Philippines) were used to fuel anti-Japanese sentiments at home. Dehumanizing the Japanese people (while incarcerating Japanese Americans in internment camps), Dower argues, made easier the notion of annihilating Japanese with atomic weaponry.

Part III: “The War in Japanese Eyes” does for the Japanese perspective what Part II did for the American side. While American cartoons and films depicted Japanese in the most derogatory and savage manner possible, Japanese efforts similarly attempted to show Americans as racially inferior and aliens to the Asian territories over which the two nations fought. Where the two cases differed, however, was in the role played by a history of Western imperialism in Asia during which the Japanese were involuntarily exposed to European influences while there was no history of Japanese occupation of Europe or of the United States. Thus, perspectives differed, with the Japanese having been more exposed to the people with whom they were at war and consequently less able to emphasize racial advantages while at the same time imbued themselves with a sense of racial superiority over other Asians.

Dower’s main point in War Without Mercy is that perspectives of other peoples as racially inferior makes easier the scale of destruction wrought by both sides during World War II. Discussing the release the day following the atomic bombing of Nagasaki of a propaganda film titled “Know Your Enemy—Japan,” Dower notes that US General Douglas MacArthur ordered the film to be withdrawn, Japan’s surrender and the scale of destruction caused by the two atomic bombs having eliminated any notion of a Japanese threat. MacArthur understood that the war’s end meant the task of shaping a new, post-Imperial Japan as a constitutional democracy required an end to dehumanizing depictions. Dower, as he notes in the book’s earlier passages, had been drawn to this subject by his awareness of how well the United States and a now-defeated and humiliated Japan worked together to rebuild the country. His point: the racism “necessary” to the war effort was counterproductive to the peacetime goal of amicable relations.

Approved by eNotes Editorial
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

What is the argument presented by Dower in "War Without Mercy"?

John Dower argues that anti-Asian, specifically anti-Japanese, racism played a strong role in the way the Allies, especially the United States, conducted World War II. Dower’s focus is on the Pacific War, in which the US military had a much more central role than Europe. He shows the racial components of propaganda, investigates the internment of Japanese and Japanese Americans, and discusses the dropping of the atomic bombs on Japan.

Dower supports the argument with the information he provides about the state of racial thinking in the late 1930s, as the war began, and then shows how it influenced US attitudes and practices once the nation entered the war in 1942. The idea of a superior race entered into Japanese nationalism, which contrasts sharply with the US promotion of inferior status as characterizing its Japanese opponents. The discussion of propaganda is central in his work. His detailed review of all aspects of the propaganda campaign—the most comprehensive the US military had ever launched—includes traditional media, such as newspapers, magazines, and posters, but also shows the effective use of film. The build-up of anti-Japanese sentiment was crucial, Dower maintains, to create a positive reception for the use of atomic weapons.

Approved by eNotes Editorial