Literary Techniques

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

In an interior monologue, an author must develop a character solely through their voice. Parker employs humor, sarcasm, and exaggeration in the internal voice of "The Waltz" to highlight the narrator's wit, intelligence, and expectations. The potency of this voice sets the stage for the story's unexpected conclusion—her willingness to keep dancing—which echoes the old saying, "actions speak louder than words." If the story offered only this, it would be seen as clever but not significant. However, other elements elevate the story to the realm of allegory.

The setting holds particular importance. It is more confined than just the room where the dance occurs. The dance itself, the embrace of the two partners, constitutes the setting. Both constraint and movement are present as the partners are "locked" together, performing their routine pattern. This mirrors the story's overall movement. We navigate through the pattern of inner complaints and outward denials, anticipating release at the end. Instead, the story's final statement, "I'd simply adore to go on waltzing," brings us back to the beginning, where the narrator agrees to dance: "Why, thank you so much. I'd adore to." The story's hallmark phrase, "There was I, trapped. Trapped like a trap in a trap," underscores not only the narrator's entrapment but the reader's as well. This is a "dance" that will never end.

The image of an unending dance invites an allegorical interpretation of the story. Parker's social occasion becomes a symbol for love, or more specifically, for marriage. The continuous kicking by the male partner, the repeated references to suffering and death, and the refusal to complain or stop the dance—"Maybe it's best not to make a scene"—all gain a more problematic significance in light of the "thirty-five years this waltz has lasted." Parker, well-versed in the metaphysical poets, was familiar with conceits, extended metaphors, and the power of symbols. She applies these traditional techniques to modern psychological fiction, crafting a timeless and troubling tale of romantic love.

Ideas for Group Discussions

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

Although brief, "The Waltz" provides ample material for discussion, largely due to the compelling narrative voice and the unexpected plot twist.

1. Which of the two voices—external and internal—do you find more credible and why?

2. How would you describe the language used by each of the two voices?

3. How might you retell this story from the perspective of the male partner? Keep in mind that he is unaware of his female partner's thoughts, knowing only what she says and does.

4. How fair or accurate is Parker's depiction of male-female dynamics? What about social norms and expectations?

5. Would the story be more or less compelling if narrated from a third-person perspective?

6. At one point, the narrator tells herself she loves her dance partner. Should we take her at her word? Why or why not?

7. Is the male partner truly the "villain" in this story? Why or why not?

8. Why does the narrator agree to continue dancing with her partner?

Social Concerns

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

On the surface, "The Waltz" seems to be just a woman's grievance about a clumsy dance partner who moves too quickly and kicks her shins. However, when read allegorically, the story provides a sharp critique of marriage. Parker accomplishes this by contrasting an external voice that agrees to dance with an internal voice that complains about the experience. The external voice is compliant, while the internal voice is marked by exaggeration: "I guess I'm as well off here," she tells herself about the waltz. "As well off as if I were in a cement mixer in full action." The waltz doesn’t last "one-hundred years" or "one-thousand years," but a notably specific...

(This entire section contains 475 words.)

Unlock this Study Guide Now

Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

duration: "And here I've been locked in his noxious embrace for the thirty-five years this waltz has lasted." Parker was thirty-five years old when she divorced her first husband in 1928, but given the dance's symbolic representation of sexual encounters, the number more likely refers to the length of a marriage.

This marriage, though, is not confined to any particular couple. Parker uses unnamed characters to broaden her critique to the institution of marriage as a whole. It is depicted as troubled, marked by miscommunication, male insensitivity, sexual dissatisfaction, and physical abuse. The female partner feels compelled to agree to her partner's request, unable to express her true feelings. She feels "trapped" by her circumstances and societal expectations for women to pair off. "But what could I do? Everyone else at the table had got up to dance, except him and me." His "dance," however, is too fast, preventing the woman from ever feeling comfortable or satisfied. "Why can't we stay in one place just long enough to get acclimated?"

This complaint is frequently interrupted by instances of violence and denial. The male partner kicks the narrator's shins; her external reaction is to smile and endure it. Internally, however, the assault takes on greater significance. "I don't want to be of the oversensitive type, but you can't tell me that kick was unpremeditated. Freud says there are no accidents. I've led no cloistered life, I've known dancing partners who have spoiled my slippers and torn my dress; but when it comes to kicking, I am Outraged Womanhood." More severe references to violence appear: "plaster cast," "splintering bones," "dead," and "I'm past all feeling now." Collectively, Parker's literal exaggerations gain allegorical strength.

Parker's biting critique of marriage and male-female relationships highlights one of the paradoxes of the Roaring Twenties, or Jazz Age. The social and sexual freedom women experienced often backfired due to persistent, neo-Victorian values regarding sex. Liberated women were still expected to be "ladies" (at least in appearance) while there was little expectation for Jazz Age men to remain gentlemen. This tension contributed to rising divorce rates. The physical violence between Parker's waltzing couple eerily predicts the spouse abuse prevalent in the 1990s.

Literary Precedents

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

The narrator in "The Waltz" resembles the sharp-tongued, complaining female archetype found in Chaucer's "Wife of Bath" from The Canterbury Tales (c. 1387-1400). However, the use of humor to critique male-female relationships has a more modern tradition among American women writers. The nineteenth century introduced Fanny Fern, Francis Miriam Berry Whitcher, and Marietta Holley, authors who provided incisive commentaries on gender dynamics through the protective guise of humor.

An intriguing comparison can be drawn with a turn-of-the-century regional story, Mary E. Wilkins Freeman's "A New England Nun." Despite being set in a different era and context, Louisa Ellis finds a way to decline a man's proposal.

"The Waltz" also aligns with works by Parker's contemporaries. Although primarily known for her poetry, Edna St. Vincent Millay's book of satirical sketches, Distressing Dialogues (1924), humorously explores various gender-related challenges. In terms of psychological depth and sexual tension, "The Waltz" can be effectively compared to Katherine Mansfield's "Bliss" (1918; see separate entry), a writer Parker greatly admired. The stream-of-consciousness style of Parker's interior monologue also connects "The Waltz" with the fiction of James Joyce and, notably, Virginia Woolf's "The Mark on the Wall" (1917; see separate entry). For the female stereotypes Parker was challenging, refer to any of the stories or novels by F. Scott Fitzgerald.

Previous

Characters

Loading...