Abstract illustration of two hats under a leafless tree in black and white

Waiting for Godot

by Samuel Beckett

Start Free Trial

Discussion Topic

Themes and Morality in Waiting for Godot

Summary:

Waiting for Godot explores themes of existentialism, the absurdity of human life, and the search for meaning. The play questions traditional moral values by presenting characters in a state of perpetual waiting and uncertainty, highlighting the futility of their actions and the ambiguity of their purpose. This challenges the audience to reflect on the nature of existence and the human condition.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

What are the themes in Waiting for Godot?

One of the play's most important themes is the need for man to create his own meaning in an inherently absurd and meaningless universe. Much of the action that happens on stage doesn't appear to make a great deal of sense. That's because Vladimir and Estragon are creating their own meaning, a complex, puzzling process from which the audience is necessarily excluded.

What Beckett is suggesting here is that this is the universal condition of humankind in the wake of World War II, which upended all the old cultural, moral, and intellectual certainties. In turn, the most cataclysmic conflict in human history forced us to create our own meaning to help us deal with living in a world evacuated of meaning. This is what Vladimir and Estragon, in their own little way, are trying to do. So if you've ever been bemused by their antics on stage—and let's face it, who hasn't?—then you'll know why. This is what creating meaning from scratch looks like.

Last Updated on
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

What are the themes in Waiting for Godot?

Waiting for Godot, a play written by Samuel Beckett in 1953, finds two characters, Vladimir and Estragon, endlessly waiting for the appearance of Godot, an unseen character who never actually makes an appearance. The English-language version of the play is a translation by Beckett of his French-language play En attendant Godot, which he wrote in 1948.

There are many themes explored throughout Beckett's Waiting for Godot. Here are a few:

Choices: Waiting for Godot portrays two men who find themselves indecisive and unable to make any real choices. Rather than giving up on their wait for Godot, they simply do nothing, unable to decide if they should stop or leave or wait or stay. Consequently, they end up staying and waiting, though it is more a consequence of not choosing than choosing.

The Absurd: Waiting for Godot portrays two men unable to communicate effectively with each other as they attempt to utilize the same language. In many instances, neither one seems able to fully understand the other though they both are speaking English. Many of their actions are also confusing and limited.

Time: For the characters of Waiting for Godot time is irrelevant; it’s not linear. They have difficulties remembering what day it is, what hour it is, how long they’ve been waiting, and how much longer they must continue to wait. They cannot remember events from the previous day, or even days, and continue to pass the time exactly, or nearly exactly, as they did before. For Didi and Gogo, time is inconsequential.

Last Updated on
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

What are the themes of Waiting for Godot?

This play is full of so many possible themes - you could have a complete field day in answering this question as an essay. But one overarching question seems to link all of these possible themes together - what is the nature of our existence as human beings?

We enter the world with no sense of identity and gradually as we grow up assume our identity from things around us - our families, our achievements etc. However, one of the major aspects of the play seems to point out that our assumed identity maybe based on illusory concepts. Beckett himself rejected the church as an "illusion" and believed that man's greatest achievements, when considered in the context of the whole universe, count for nothing, but at the same time, life without illusions of grandeur and importance would be a very sad affair.

In relation to this, you need to ask yourself what kind of world it is that Vladimir and Estragon live in. They don't have the normal securities that we do in our lives - nothing is certain, violence can appear be inflicted upon them at any time, and there are no concepts such as justice or securities of any afterlife. Even simple tasks are made out to be major achievements. The human condition is therefore depicted to be incredibly insecure, but perhaps the one redeeming feature is our search for meaning and significance.

Against this relentless nihilism of the play, another redeeming aspect is the friendship of Vladimir and Estragon, and it is worth the pain to examine their relationship based in the context of the whole play. What does their friendship say about hope in an otherwise hopeless environment? What hope does it offer to us as human beings as we struggle to make sense of who we are?

Last Updated on
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

How is morality a theme in Waiting for Godot?

Many readers believe that, in Waiting for Godot, Samuel Beckett promotes the idea that all life is meaningless and there is no point to existence. While there is certainly an absurd despair present in the play, and while the exploration of meaninglessness is one of the piece's central themes, Beckett is not actually as nihilistic as some people would like to believe. Indeed, one could even argue that Beckett presents us with a morality that relies upon friendship and human existence.

Consider, for instance, that this is a play of pairings. There are two sets of relationships: Vladimir and Estragon, and Lucky and Pozzo. It's certainly true that Pozzo abuses Lucky, and that Estragon and Vladimir argue and insult one another. However, it also seems that the members of each relationship rely on one another heavily. For instance, while Pozzo uses Lucky as his servant in Act 1, in Act 2 we see the roles reversed, with Lucky acting as the master and Pozzo stumbling along on a leash. Both Pozzo and Lucky seem to take turns relying on one another. Likewise, it's clear that both Estragon and Vladimir would be helpless if either one was on his own. For instance, Estragon only succeeds in pulling off his boot once Vladimir arrives. Furthermore, in Act 2 Vladimir covers the sleeping form of Estragon with his coat to make him more comfortable.

While subtle, it's clear that, in this world of "meaninglessness," the only thing that people can rely on is their connection to other humans. In that case, Beckett's morality relies upon human friendship. With friendship, Beckett says, we are able to overcome obstacles and support one another, and so the moral good involves nurturing the connection we have with others. Indeed, one could view the play as a poignant display of the way in which people utilize friendships to navigate the harsh and unfeeling external world. 

See eNotes Ad-Free

Start your 48-hour free trial to get access to more than 30,000 additional guides and more than 350,000 Homework Help questions answered by our experts.

Get 48 Hours Free Access
Last Updated on