Critical Context

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

Friedrich Dürrenmatt’s evolution as a playwright was a complex one, and The Visit mirrors the issues that concerned him for most of his life. His childhood was spent in a Swiss village that resembles Gullen, and some of his earliest recollections are of studying the townspeople of his hometown of Konolfingen, near Berne. The son of a Protestant minister, he was educated at local schools and at the University of Berne. Because the Switzerland of his formative years was an island of peace in a world at war, the issues of humanity and justice swirled around his country, and Dürrenmatt became deeply interested in justice and in its administration. He was also concerned about the self-satisfied attitude of many of his countrymen who chose stability, security, and common sense over intellectual daring and humanitarianism. Moreover, he was afraid of the vast powers of the modern megastate when controlled by a dictator. Thus, his commentaries on society, both in his prose and in his plays, often look at justice in society and justice for the individual, which, when followed to a logical conclusion, often led to grotesque results.

In the development of post-World War II theater, grotesque refers to a middle ground between epic theater and absurdist theater. Epic theater is predicated upon the changeability of the world, and the playwright tries to demonstrate alternatives to the playgoer; absurdist theater conceives of the world as immutable and senseless. In grotesque theater, the world is neither rational nor senseless. As uncertainty is the only certainty, a play must have elements of tragedy and of comedy within it, for that is the essence of life itself. Only tragicomedy can give an appearance of reality while the world is being questioned, which is the function of the playwright. Hence, Dürrenmatt’s plays are tragicomedies in which he poses questions regarding issues that concern him deeply.

In his first play, Es steht geschrieben (pr., pb. 1947; It Is Written, 1960; revised as Die Wiedertaufer, pr., pb. 1967, The Anabaptists, 1967), Dürrenmatt presents a parody of justice in which there is no resolution. Romulus der Grosse (pr. 1949; Romulus the Great, 1961) is a play about the last Roman emperor, who was defeated and betrayed. Romulus heroically goes to meet the barbarian victors, who ironically condemn him to life and kill the betrayers. Die Ehe des Herrn Mississippi (pr., pb. 1952; The Marriage of Mr. Mississippi, 1958) and Ein Engel kommt nach Babylon (pr. 1953; An Angel Comes to Babylon, 1962) both portray the nonhero who knew that he could not win against the mighty. The Visit contains the themes of his earlier work brought together in Dürrenmatt’s masterpiece. Whereas his other main characters meet sad fates, only Ill of The Visit is truly a tragic hero. Yet Ill’s own expiation is ironic, for the town benefits from his tragedy. Ill’s life becomes irrelevant as Gullen becomes Gulden (golden). Later plays continue these themes. One of Dürrenmatt’s best works, Die Physiker (pr., pb. 1962; The Physicists, 1963), also provided him with international success. In this play, a nuclear physicist has taken refuge in a mental institution, and spies are trying to steal his secrets. The physicist converts the spies to his pacifism, but a doctor obtains the secrets and sells them. Dürrenmatt’s ironic message is that science must progress and humankind must be served. All Dürrenmatt’s plays are fundamentally pessimistic, reflecting his anxiety regarding the future of the world.

Nevertheless, his plays are not simple, overt statements for or against anything, for each play has several levels of comprehension. As...

(This entire section contains 872 words.)

See This Study Guide Now

Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this study guide. You'll also get access to more than 30,000 additional guides and more than 350,000 Homework Help questions answered by our experts.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

a result of the ambiguity of Dürrenmatt’s plays, criticism is often contradictory. Is he profound or shallow? Is he parodic or serious? What are the central themes in his plays? Even Dürrenmatt himself prefers not to help literary critics; he loves to tease or to exaggerate, telling each critic something different about his plays. He prefers to be paradoxical and polemical, whereas critics prefer to be neat and absolute. Hence, the interpretations of Dürrenmatt vary widely, usually according to the bias or prejudice of the critic. For example, Dürrenmatt is quite popular in Eastern Europe. The apparent attack on capitalism and the greed of the middle class inThe Visit are cited as being significant social criticism of Western capitalism. Yet other critics dismiss the attack on capitalism as being merely a facade for the profound discussion of moral values that The Visit most assuredly portrays. To confine Dürrenmatt’s work to a monothesis is to emasculate the breadth of his vision. The Visit is all-encompassing, for it looks at justice, greed, corruption, character, morality, and humanity. Dürrenmatt once wrote, “In the mess that is our century . . . there are no longer any guilty men, nor are there any to be held responsible any more.” The Visit is a study of that concept. The juxtaposition of the town and Ill portrays society and the individual. It was not an immoral world, only an amoral one, and one in which greed won out over justice. It would be humorous were it not so sad. Thus, Dürrenmatt’s The Visit is a play with timeless themes presented in timeless fashion.

Next

Critical Evaluation