Vine Deloria, Jr.

Start Free Trial

The Land Was Theirs

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

In the following essay, Francis Paul Prucha critiques Vine Deloria, Jr.'s Behind the Trail of Broken Treaties for its lack of objectivity, factual errors, and inconsistencies, while underscoring the book's significant role in highlighting the urgent and enduring nature of Indian demands for justice and compensation.

In his Behind the Trail of Broken Treaties: An Indian Declaration of Independence …, Deloria draws together the arguments for autonomous status for the Indians. It is not an objective account, for Deloria is clearly promoting a cause. The book, too, has a good many factual errors, and it is frequently inconsistent in what it proposes. The author, moreover, has a hard time deciding just what status he is advocating for the Indians. Is it to be "international status," "quasi-protectorate status," "contractual sovereignty" or "a new treaty relationship"? Nor can he assert that he speaks for all the Indians. Yet the message that comes through despite these faults is an extremely important one. No one can read this book and continue to think complacently that the Indians' cries for justice and compensation are only a passing irritant for white America, which will soon quiet down and go away. Whoever is concerned about Indian affairs today must read books like this to get a feeling of what the agitation is all about. (p. 457)

Francis Paul Prucha, "The Land Was Theirs," in America (© America Press, 1976; all rights reserved), Vol. 134, No. 20, May 22, 1976, pp. 456-57.∗

Get Ahead with eNotes

Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.

Get 48 Hours Free Access
Previous

Choice

Next

Book Reviews and Essays: 'Behind the Trail of Broken Treaties'

Loading...