Student Question
What unnatural distinctions between men and women does Mary Wollstonecraft critique in her work? Does she consider any natural distinctions?
Quick answer:
Mary Wollstonecraft critiques the unnatural distinctions between men and women as socially constructed roles imposed by patriarchal traditions, such as men being breadwinners and women homemakers. She argues these roles prevent women from achieving independence and force them into "legal prostitution," or marriages for stability rather than love. Wollstonecraft acknowledges natural distinctions, like women's "natural affection," but stresses that societal roles should not restrict their true potential and independence.
When Wollstonecraft talks of unnatural distinctions between men and women, she's referring to those artificial differences imposed by custom and tradition. Natural distinctions, on the other hand, are those arising out of the biological differences between the sexes. One such example, according to Wollstonecraft, is the "natural affection" that makes women good wives and mothers but which they are prevented from displaying by a want of virtue arising from a lack of independence.
Examples of unnatural distinctions could include the respective roles that men and women play in society. In Wollstonecraft's day, men were expected to be the bread-winner while women stayed at home to look after the children. Wollstonecraft believes such an unnatural distinction to be grossly unfair. She argues that if women were able to pursue careers like men, then many of them might be saved from what she calls "common and legal prostitution."
By "legal prostitution" Wollstonecraft...
Unlock
This Answer NowStart your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
is referring to the situation in which many women found themselves in her day: getting married to men they didn't love simply in order to have a stable home life. Such a distinction is unnatural because it isn't based on the innate characteristics and talents that women have and which they could use to achieve true independence, if only they were allowed to. Distinctions such as these are imposed on women by a patriarchal society which seeks to maintain men in a position of power and authority.
Though things have changed an awful lot since Wollstonecraft's day, there's still a long way to go towards achieving genuine equality between the sexes. The gap in pay between men and women continues to be a persistent problem, as does the common prejudice that certain careers—such as science and engineering—are somehow not suitable for women. Wollstonecraft would certainly have described these as examples of unnatural distinctions and would've challenged them with the eloquence, vigor, and determination for which she was famous.