Themes: The Perils of Consumerism and Technology
“The Veldt,” a story written in 1950, centers around a version of what can be called a smart home. In “The Veldt,” the smart home symbolizes both convenience and danger, and it ultimately consumes its adult inhabitants. The story thus showcases Bradbury’s wariness around the excessive use of technology. While the story is disarmingly prescient—a home with smart lighting and other features is common more than half a century later—it is not just about the future. Bradbury’s views in “The Veldt” and other works he wrote in the 1950s were a response to the increasingly consumerist culture of the United States. By 1950, World War II had ended and the American economy was booming. America was entering a golden period of advertising, attractive and convenient consumer goods, and entertaining TV shows like I Love Lucy (1951-1957). This was the period where magazines were dotted with advertisements for appliances and conveniences like toasters and whipped cream in a can. Families gauged their worth by the latest appliances they owned. The love for things was accompanied by a strain of cultural conservatism and anti-intellectualism. In “The Veldt,” Bradbury considers what happens when consumerism is left unchecked. When does technology become too much technology?
In “The Veldt,” the entity most affected by consumerism and technology is the family itself. As the family at the center of the story relies more and more on technology to supplant human roles, the ties among members break down. The primary bond between parent and child itself gets corrupted, and ultimately technology figuratively and literally consumes George and Lydia, as well as the innocence and empathy of their children. The fate Bradbury imagines touches on contemporary concerns about screen addiction, the devaluation of empathy, and humans being made redundant. George may draw pride in the trademarked “soundproofed Happylife Home, which had cost them thirty thousand dollars installed,” but it also means he is beginning to view his achievements in terms of consumer products and brands. When Lydia expresses her worry that their efficient home is making her feel “unnecessary,” George responds that the reason he brought the house was so that they wouldn’t have to do anything. Even after he senses the danger of the nursery, he admires the “mechanical marvel” it represents. Thus, George in particular is oblivious to the perils surrounding him until it is too late. Here, George represents the hypermasculine ethic that the goal of life is to gain wealth and status. Lydia, representing a more natural wisdom, senses that technology is making the family less human, but she too late second-guesses her own intuition.
Unknowingly, the parents lead the children into addiction to technology. Peter and Wendy are only ten but stay out late at a carnival, where they take helicopter jumps for fun and eat unlimited fast food and candy. Thus, they are immersed in a heady rush of fun-filled, expensive adventures. For Peter and Wendy, the only reality they have known is one of extreme convenience and immediate wish-fulfillment. With their home anticipating and meeting their every need, the children forget what it means to make an effort. They turn into passive consumers. When George tells Peter there are other things he can do apart from playing in the simulation of the nursery, Peter responds, “I don’t want to do anything but look and listen and smell; what else is there to do?”
When this reality of passive consumerism is threatened, the children turn violent. The children can sense that their parents, especially their mother, are growing concerned about their attachment to the nursery. They begin resenting the parents for this concern, projecting their anger onto the simulation of the veldt. The more the parents worry, the angrier the children appear, and the more dangerous the veldt becomes. Thus, the family gets caught in a vicious cycle.
Expert Q&A
What early evidence in "The Veldt" suggests the Happylife Home hasn't made the adults happy? What message might Bradbury be conveying?
What two points about modern life is Bradbury making in the following sentence from "The Veldt"?
"At dinner they ate alone, for Wendy and Peter were at a special plastic carnival across town and had televised home to say they'd be late, to go ahead eating."
One point that Bradbury makes in the sentence from "The Veldt" is that the children do not feel bonded to their parents. A second point is that the children have used technology to take control of their family. They don't ask for permission to stay at the carnival. Instead, they televise to their parents that they won't be home.
Why did the Hadleys call a psychologist instead of turning off the nursery themselves in "The Veldt"?
In "The Veldt," George and Lydia Hadley call a psychologist because they feel helpless and lack confidence in their parenting abilities, having relied on their automated home to fulfill their roles. The HappyLife Home has made them dependent, and they're frightened by their children's behavior and the realistic nursery. They need outside authority to guide them, as they are overwhelmed and unsure of how to regain control over their children and the situation.
Why does the psychologist recommend turning off the nursery in "The Veldt" immediately?
The psychologist, David McClean, recommends shutting down the nursery immediately because it has assumed a parental role, replacing George and Lydia Hadley in their children's lives. This reliance has poisoned the parent-child relationship, with the children resenting their parents for threatening to restrict access to the nursery. McClean believes that removing the technology is essential to repair this damage and suggests psychological help for the children to prevent further deterioration.
How does the house infantilize the Hadleys in "The Veldt", and why is it dangerous?
The Happylife Home in "The Veldt" infantilizes the Hadleys by taking over all parental roles and responsibilities, making the parents feel obsolete. This dependency on technology erodes their authority and emotional connection with their children. The house enables the children to assume control, leading to dangerous consequences as they indulge in violent fantasies. Bradbury critiques a society that prioritizes convenience over meaningful relationships, warning of technology's potential to undermine family dynamics.
What does "The Veldt" suggest as the source of the children's hatred for their parents?
"The Veldt" suggests that the children's hatred for their parents stems from alienation and unmet emotional needs. The parents' reliance on technology and consumerism leads to neglect, leaving the children psychologically and physically abandoned. As their need for parental love and care is unmet, the children replace these needs with whims, ultimately resulting in resentment and hatred. The children's attachment to the virtual veldt further alienates them from their parents, fueling their animosity.
What are the mental and emotional effects of the Veldt on the children?
The veldt has significant mental and emotional effects on the children, Peter and Wendy, making them dependent on the nursery's technology. This dependency replaces emotional bonds with their parents, as the children view the veldt's violent imagery as reality, leading to a power struggle. The nursery becomes a parental substitute, fostering an obsession with control. While their parents, George and Lydia, experience fear and detachment, psychologist David McClean warns of the nursery's negative impact, suggesting it requires dismantling.
Why do virtual lions kill real people in "The Veldt" by Ray Bradbury?
The virtual lions kill the parents in "The Veldt" to highlight the dangers of overreliance on technology. Bradbury's narrative shows how the children, Wendy and Peter, become detached from reality and their parents due to their immersion in virtual realities. This detachment leads to a loss of parental influence and discipline, ultimately causing the children to harbor anger and seek vengeance, symbolized by the lions.
In "The Veldt," how do the Hadleys spoil their children despite realizing the nursery's issues?
In “The Veldt,” even after they realize something is wrong with the nursery, the Hadleys continue to spoil their children by indulging their request to spent one last minute in their playroom before the technology is shut down.
How can the evidence from "The Veldt" support the claim that the children have a closer relationship with the house than their parents?
Evidence A: You've let this room and this house replace you and your wife in your children's affections.
Evidence B: "Don't let them do it!" wailed Peter at the ceiling, as if he was talking to the house, the nursery. "Don't let Father kill everything." He turned to his father. "Oh, I hate you!"
In "The Veldt," evidence shows the children, Peter and Wendy, have a closer relationship with the house than their parents. Evidence A highlights that the automated house and nursery have replaced the parents in their children's affections, as noted by psychologist David McClean. Evidence B demonstrates Peter's emotional attachment to the house, as he pleads with it against his father's actions, expressing hatred towards his father and valuing the nursery over his parents.
Get Ahead with eNotes
Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.
Already a member? Log in here.
