Twilight: Los Angeles, 1992 Critical Overview
by Anna Deavere Smith

Start Your Free Trial

Download Twilight: Los Angeles, 1992 Study Guide

Subscribe Now

Critical Overview

(Drama for Students)

Anna Deavere Smith's Twilight: Los Angeles, 1992 has garnered considerable critical acclaim through its production history, stretching from venues in Los Angeles and New York to Washington, D. C. and London, England. Its success in theaters far removed from the play's focus and epicenter, the Spring, 1992, civil upheaval in South-Central Los Angeles, attests to its power to transcend the topicality of its content—the real-world social problems that have led P. J. Corso and others to call her play a "docudrama."

For some critics, in her On the Road series, of which Twilight: Los Angeles, 1992 and Fires in the Mirror are the most compelling and successful parts, Smith has created what a reviewer in Time claims is "a new art form." But what that new form is remains very controversial. So, too, does Smith's classification as a writer.

In analyzing Twilight: Los Angeles, 1992 and other pieces from On the Road, some critics have pondered over this very issue. For Chris Vognar, the question is "what to call her? Actress/playwright? Anthropologist/ethnographer?" Smith's text, after all, is primarily an archive of the actual words of real people who lived through and in or near the turmoil that began with the beating of Rodney King and exploded into the South-Central Los Angeles rioting and looting. Smith compiled and arranged the monologues from interviews that she conducted with these people, leading some to discuss her role as writer as largely that of a journalist or "oral historian'' in the mold of her acknowledged mentor, Studs Terkel. The argument was rehashed by the 1994 Pulitzer Prize jury in drama, which removed Twilight: Los Angeles, 1992 from consideration, as Sean Mitchell reported, because "its language was not invented but gleaned from interviews." It was also the opinion of the jury that the work could be performed only by Smith, because she alone conducted the interviews.

That critical caveat is not so troubling to those who see Smith as a “performance-playwright" and concentrate on her stage artistry rather than her compiled, inanimate text. Part of Smith's skill is revealed in the dramatic tapestry of disparate voices that she weaves in performance. As Jan Stuart notes, "Smith lines up her characters in a boldly ironic juxtaposition," threading her way through what Robert Brustein calls the "victims, victimizers, and viewers'' that she depicts.

More an arranger than a composer perhaps, but Smith, for most reviewers, has nevertheless worked theatrical magic in the various productions of Twilight. Almost no critic denies Smith's mimetic skills, her great artistic gift in depicting a broad spectrum of characters through what Monica Cortes calls "acting otherness." Martin Hernandez describes her as a "human chameleon, embodying each character with astounding flexibility.'' Through sudden shifts in her posture, gesture and voice, accompanied by minor, quick-change adjustments in dress, Smith transforms herself from one person into another, crossing chasms of race, gender, age, and class in the blink of an eye. Describing her technique, Richard Scheduler claims that Smith "works by means of deep mimesis, a process opposite to that of 'pretend.'" He maintains that she "incorporates" her characters and that her method "is less like that of a conventional Euro-American actor and more like that of African, Native American, and Asian ritualists."

More of a sticking point for interpreters of her play is Smith's assumed purpose in Twilight and other plays in her On the Road series. Most credit Smith with admirable objectivity and basic fairness. Michael Feingold argues that the playwright-actress arranges her materials "so that we see all sides" equitably. Smith "never tilts this balance," he...

(The entire section is 919 words.)