In what years did A Time to Kill and To Kill a Mockingbird take place?

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

John Grisham, in A Time to Kill, does specify the year in which his story takes place.  The closest he comes in his description of Omar Noose, the judge who will preside over the trial that provides the basis of Grisham’s novel about racism in the American South.  In that description, the author provides the following comment regarding Judge Noose: “That's how ex-State Senator Noose became Circuit Judge Noose. He was elected in 1975, and reelected in 1979 and 1983.”

So, we now know that Judge Noose was most recently reelected in 1983.  Circuit judges in the State of Mississippi serve four-year terms, as noted in the above quote, which is consistent with the state’s website for its Judicial Branch [See:].  Consequently, the year in which Grisham’s story takes place would be (assuming the election occurred in November of 1983, with the judge being sworn into office the following January) between 1984 and 1987 or 1988. 

Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird, published in 1960, takes place in 1935, and the two years preceding it, the seminal clue provided in the following comment by Atticus Finch during his summation and closing remarks during the rape trial of Tom Robinson: “There is a tendency in this year of grace, 1935, for certain people to use this phrase out of context, to satisfy all conditions.”  The reason we know that the story takes place in years preceding 1935 but leading up to that date is Scout’s descriptions of the passage of time, particularly with respect to the annual summer returns to Maycomb of Dill.

Approved by eNotes Editorial
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

‘A Time to Kill’ is set in rural Mississippi in the 1980’s and published in 1989.. ‘To Kill a Mockingbird’ is set in Alabama in the mid 1930’s but published in 1960.

Despite the fifty year gap between the settings – and a thirty year gap between their publication – there are fascinating parallels and contrasts to be drawn between the two texts. The pervading connection is of course the white male lawyer representing a black male defendant. The final results show some evolution in terms of racial understanding but the progress towards equality is revealed through both to be depressingly slow.

See eNotes Ad-Free

Start your 48-hour free trial to get access to more than 30,000 additional guides and more than 350,000 Homework Help questions answered by our experts.

Get 48 Hours Free Access
Approved by eNotes Editorial