Illustration of the profiles of three women

The Three Sisters

by Anton Chekhov

Start Free Trial

Critical Overview

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

Anton Chekhov's The Three Sisters stands as a seminal work in the realm of Russian drama and a testament to the enduring power of realism in theater. Written in the twilight of Chekhov’s life, the play captures the essence of human longing and the search for fulfillment amidst the mundane. Though initially misunderstood and critiqued for its unconventional style, the play has gained recognition over time as a cornerstone of modern drama.

Thematic Elements and Character Dynamics

Premiering in January 1901 at the Moscow Art Theatre, The Three Sisters was Chekhov’s first play written explicitly for this venue, directed by Konstantin Stanislavsky. It featured Olga Knipper, who would become Chekhov's wife, in the role of Masha. The play has since become one of Chekhov’s most performed works, capturing a unique blend of personal and societal themes. Chekhov, who was exiled to the warm climate of Yalta due to his tuberculosis, projected his frustrations and yearnings onto the characters of Olga, Masha, and Irina. These sisters dream of returning to the cultural vibrancy of Moscow, trapped in a provincial town that stifles their intellectual and emotional development.

The sisters' longing for Moscow is more than a physical return; it represents an idealized past and a hope for a meaningful future. Their situation is exacerbated by Natasha, who symbolizes the encroaching new middle class, embodying characteristics that are antithetical to the sisters' refined sensibilities. Natasha’s rise to power within their household signifies a larger social shift, one that the sisters find difficult to navigate. This microcosm of change reflects Chekhov’s broader critique of the societal transitions occurring in Russia at the time.

The Struggle with Reality

Chekhov presents the sisters as caught between their dreams and their stark reality. They are educated and cultured but find themselves in a society that no longer values these traits. The idea of work is introduced as a potential escape from their ennui. However, efforts to find satisfaction in work fall short: Irina’s job at the telegraph office is unfulfilling, and Tusenbach’s aspirations in managing a brick factory are unrealized. Similarly, Olga’s promotion, Masha’s romantic endeavors, and Andrey’s academic ambitions all culminate in disillusionment rather than fulfillment.

Vershinin, another character trapped in his own cycle of hope and resignation, offers a bit of optimism, suggesting that life might improve in the future. This sentiment underscores the play's pervasive tension between aspiration and reality—a hallmark of Chekhov’s exploration into the absurdity and futility inherent in the human condition.

Artistic and Symbolic Devices

Chekhov's attention to mundane details and his use of sound play significant roles in the narrative. The rhythms of daily life, exemplified by routine sounds such as bells and music, create an atmosphere that both grounds the play in reality and highlights its irony. These elements, meticulously included by Chekhov, were initially underestimated by audiences unfamiliar with such realism in theater. They reflect the steady progression of time and the impermanence of the sisters’ dreams, as seen when the clock breaks, symbolizing the destruction of their Moscow ideal.

The seasons and times of day also mirror the sisters' journey. The play begins in spring, with its inherent promise of renewal, yet gradually moves toward the resignation of autumn, marked by the physical and metaphorical ousting from their home by Natasha. This environmental symbolism amplifies the internal struggles and inevitable decay faced by the characters.

Reception and Legacy

Initially, The Three Sisters faced criticism for its perceived lack of conventional plot structure and dramatic action. Reflecting on its reception, biographer Henri Troyat noted that audiences were unaccustomed to Chekhov's realistic portrayal of ordinary people. This style...

(This entire section contains 803 words.)

Unlock this Study Guide Now

Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

of narrative, focusing on nuanced character interactions rather than overt theatricality, was a departure from the period’s expectations of drama. Critics like Soviet A. Shaftymov later recognized that Chekhov’s inclusion of everyday details was not a flaw but a conscious artistic choice.

Despite early misunderstandings, Chekhov’s work gradually gained traction, especially after the Moscow Art Theatre's international tours in the post-World War I era. These tours helped introduce Chekhov's plays to global audiences, who eventually embraced the depth and subtlety of his storytelling. In London, during the 1920s, Chekhov found a receptive audience that resonated with the themes of social decline and existential reflection, paralleling the realities of an empire facing its own transformations.

In Russia, Chekhov’s reputation solidified posthumously, notably after the Russian Revolution, when his style was adopted as a model for Soviet theater. The political climate, despite its constraints, inadvertently championed Chekhov’s portrayal of the human experience, making his plays staples in educational and theatrical settings. Today, he remains a pivotal figure in theater, revered for his contribution to realism and his empathetic exploration of humanity’s perennial quest for meaning amid life's uncertainties.

Next

Essays and Criticism

Loading...