Last Updated on August 7, 2019, by eNotes Editorial. Word Count: 664
James Madison explained Americans’ historical skepticism, this deep empiricism, this way: “Is it not the glory of the people of America, that, whilst they have paid a decent regard to the opinions of former times and other nations, they have not suffered a blind veneration for antiquity, for custom, or for names, to overrule the suggestions of their own good sense, the knowledge of their own situation, and the lessons of their own experience?” Evidence, for Madison, was everything.
Here Lepore articulates what she believes to be a major pillar of the American experiment alongside the principle of legal equality, or being subject to the same laws. Scienza, or knowledge, in politics is or should be based on empirical evidence and practical experience. Lepore is right to put her finger on the tension between the principle of equality under law as understood by the founders and the high regard for science and practical knowledge. Can we have both? What if they conflict? Both, variously interpreted as core pillars of the American experimental republic, are also often at the source of the most bitter conflicts in American politics, not only today, but from the beginning of the republic.
What, then, of the American past? There is, to be sure, a great deal of anguish in American history and more hypocrisy. No nation and no people are relieved of these. But there is also, in the American past, an extraordinary amount of decency and hope, of prosperity and ambition, and much, especially, of invention and beauty. Some American history books fail to criticize the United States; others do nothing but. This book is neither kind. The truths on which the nation was founded are not mysteries, articles of faith, never to be questioned, as if the founding were an act of God, but neither are they lies, all facts fictions, as if nothing can be known, in a world without truth. Between reverence and worship, on the one side, and irreverence and contempt, on the other, lies an uneasy path
Here Lapore tries to chart a balanced path between the extremes of strident anti-American historiography and histories that are uncritical. The principles of the founding are to be dealt with, according to Lapore, neither by abject veneration nor by outright rejection. That would be too easy. It is much harder to take up the challenge of using our experience and reason to solve the problems of the present by political discourse. Of course, the problem with this is that thoughtful political discourse has almost been rendered impossible in America through the...
(The entire section contains 664 words.)
Unlock This Study Guide Now
Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this These Truths study guide. You'll get access to all of the These Truths content, as well as access to more than 30,000 additional guides and more than 350,000 Homework Help questions answered by our experts.
- Chapter Summaries