Compare and Contrast
1789: Jeremy Bentham's Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation outlines the principle of utility, asserting that morality is determined by actions that produce the greatest good for society as a whole, regardless of the impact on any individual or group. This theory opposes intuitionism, which suggests that humans have an innate sense of right and wrong.
1971: John Rawls' A Theory of Justice revolutionizes ethical and political philosophy, providing the first significant challenge to the predominance of utilitarianism.
Today: The ongoing critical response to Rawls, both supportive and dismissive, continues to highlight his significant influence in the field of ethics.
Mid-1800s: In England, legal, educational, and social reforms arise from widespread corruption and dissatisfaction. A new legal system, heavily influenced by utilitarian principles, replaces the existing system based on natural law.
1960s and 1970s: Amid significant social and political upheaval, including the civil rights movement, women's liberation movement, gay rights movement, and a national "War on Poverty," many Americans focus on social justice and its role within a democratic society.
Today: Despite being largely illegal, discrimination continues to persist in various forms. Efforts to reform welfare aim to reduce poverty.
Mid-1800s: The Civil War results in the complete abolition of legal slavery in the United States.
1960s and 1970s: Legislation is enacted to end segregation in the United States, and affirmative action is gradually introduced.
Today: Segregation is illegal, and affirmative action is widely implemented, though it remains a topic of political and legal debate. The American pursuit of civil equality serves as a model for other nations, such as South Africa.
Bibliography
Sources
Barry, Brian. The Liberal Theory of Justice: A Critical
Examination of the Principal Doctrines in ‘‘A Theory of
Justice’’ by John Rawls. Clarendon Press, 1973, p. ix.
Davion, Victoria, and Clark Wolf, eds. The Idea of a
Political Liberalism: Essays on Rawls. Rowman and Littlefield
Publishers, Inc., 2000, pp. 1, 3, 14.
Freeman, Samuel, ed. John Rawls: Collected Papers. Harvard
University Press, 1999, pp. ix, xii.
Martin, Rex. Rawls and Rights. University Press of Kansas,
1985, p. vii.
Rao, A. P. Three Lectures on John Rawls. Indian Philosophical
Quarterly Publications, 1981, p. 1.
Schaefer, David Lewis. Justice or Tyranny?: A Critique of
John Rawls’s ‘‘A Theory of Justice’’. Kennikat Press, 1979,
pp. ix, 105.
Wolff, Robert Paul. Understanding Rawls: A Reconstruction
and Critique of ‘‘A Theory of Justice’’. Princeton University
Press, 1977, pp. 3, 16.
Further Reading
Alejandro, Roberto. The Limits of Rawlsian Justice. Johns
Hopkins University Press, 1998.
Alejandro offers a critical analysis of Rawls’s
theory of justice with respect to the American legal
system.
Corlett, J. Angelo, ed. Equality and Liberty: Analyzing
Rawls and Nozick. St. Martin’s Press, 1991.
Corlett presents a collection of essays exploring the
concepts of justice, equality, and liberty as discussed by
Rawls and his key critic, Robert Nozick.
George, Robert P., and Christopher Wolfe, eds. Natural Law
and Public Reason. Georgetown University Press, 2000.
George and Wolfe compile essays that
examine the themes of natural law, liberalism, and
reason in Rawls’s work.
Get Ahead with eNotes
Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.
Already a member? Log in here.