The Slap

by Christos Tsiolkas

Start Free Trial

Family and Responsibility

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

Concepts of family and responsibility in the twenty-first century drive The Slap. Whether it was right or wrong, Harry's slap forces everyone at Hector’s barbecue to assess their values. For many, the slap is a polarizing action that breaks up friendships or reinforces familial connections. Aisha is particularly affected by this act and is forced to explore her responsibilities as a wife and as a friend.

Aisha takes a balanced view of the slap. She recognizes that Hugo was acting horribly, and she feels that Harry should not have hit a child. She disapproves of Rosie’s determination to bring Harry to trial for assault. Although she wants to be loyal to her friend, Rosie, Anouk reminds her that she must also act out of loyalty to her husband’s family. Since Harry is Hector's cousin, Aisha is forced to overcome her feelings in order to preserve her family’s relationship. At first, Aisha tries to provide emotional support to Rosie, but their relationship is brought under additional stress. Rosie later demands that Aisha cut off all contact with Hector’s family, which Aisha refuses to do. Ultimately, Aisha sacrifices her relationship with Rosie in order to preserve the relationships of her family.

It seems that Tsiolkas might have written a novel promoting families first, but this is a problematic interpretation. Tsiolkas does not pretend that it is easy to maintain a healthy family. All of the married characters in the novel are constantly forced to evaluate the stresses that their families place upon them. When Aisha is given the choice to contact Art again, thus jeopardizing her marriage to Hector, Anouk advises Aisha to cut off all contact. When pressed about whether she wants to remain with Hector, Aisha replies, “That’s what you people who are not married don’t ever understand. When can you ever be sure?” Manolis experiences a similar conflict when he finds himself jealous of Thanassis for leaving his wife. However, most of the characters in the novel resist the temptation to leave their families.

Still, Tsiolkas resists offering a clear-cut statement on this devotion. Gary is clearly unhappy in his marriage to Rosie and he seems to be descending into alcoholism. Additionally, Anouk lives happily and healthfully as a single woman, dedicated to pursuing her own goals. Finally, Tsiolkas’s families are not limited to traditional relationships. Richie and Connie are both raised by their aunts, and this is not presented as a disappointing alternative to the traditional family structure. It is clear that, for Tsiolkas, there are bonds that have value and that are worth making sacrifices for. However, he also takes the time to discuss the multiple types of family relationships—and the costs they bring.

Morality in the Modern World

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

The central premise of The Slap is its titular slap. Is this a moment of child abuse or was Harry within his rights to slap Hugo in defense of his child? Tsiolkas takes care to prevent his readers from finding a morally pure perspective. Yes, Hugo is slapped, but as many characters reflect, he is also a “little monster.” In contrast, Harry could be seen as a man defending his child, but Tsiolkas again refuses to let his readers off so easily. Instead, Harry engages in any number of illicit practices, ranging from drug use to ongoing adultery. Because Rosie and Gary’s relationship is fraught with problems and because they repeatedly enable Hugo’s spoiled actions, it is difficult to view them as victims. Aisha suggests that everyone at the barbecue was behaving badly, which is a good description for every character in the novel....

(This entire section contains 388 words.)

Unlock this Study Guide Now

Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

Tsiolkas not only writes about many people acting badly but he creates complex moral situations to caution his audience from didactically judging these characters.

This confusion suggests that there might be no morality in the modern world. Tsiolkas’s modern characters struggle to understand the world around them, constantly second guessing their instincts and reactions. In contrast, members of the older generation, like Koula, feel comfortable judging others. However, Manolis points out that his wife’s black-and-white view of the world only survives when she omits “grey” details. Koula disapproves of divorce, but Manolis points out that their daughter is divorced. However, even Manolis is described as being “tired of this new world.”

Tsiolkas relies on Hugo to complicate the morality of the younger generation. Hugo not only kicks and spits at children at the party, but he repeats the action later toward a complete stranger while riding on Richie’s shoulders. Richie is embarrassed by Hugo’s actions, but Rosie and Gary again refuse to discipline their child. When the novel closes, Hugo remains the “little monster” that many of the characters see him as. Hugo needs firm boundaries.

Ultimately, Tsiolkas seems to be suggesting that the relativism that dominates modern morality may seem like progress in comparison to Koula’s black-and-white worldview, but he cautions that it is not without its own problems that need to be dealt with. Tsiolkas otherwise refuses to offer a didactic response to this question.

Contemporary Melbourne

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

Tsiolkas offers a cross section of life in contemporary Melbourne in The Slap. The Australian middle class that Tsiolkas depicts is not predominantly White and conservative. Instead, Melbourne is portrayed as a hip, cosmopolitan city with a multicultural plurality of peoples and beliefs. There is still racial tension, but Melbourne is a city that is consistently changing as the values and backgrounds of its people change. Tsiolkas creates a world where people are free to embrace a variety of lifestyles, and he makes it difficult to invalidate any one of those lifestyles.

Previous

Summary

Next

Characters

Loading...