In regard to The Boy in the Striped Pajamas, I'm not sure if I
would say that there's a level of sarcasm so much as a level of irony. Bruno is
naive on an outrageous level, and it's partially due to his father's negligence
and preoccupation with his career. For example, Bruno is frustrated that he has
to move to "out-with" because of orders from "the fury."
There is a brutal irony in almost every aspect of Bruno's frame of mind. He is
unpressed by his new house in "out-with," his primary frustration being that
there is no banister to slide down. Bruno also doesn't seem to recognize prison
clothes, referring to them as "striped pajamas." This irony might be called
cynical on an almost sarcastic level, but it is made more heartfelt by the fact
that Bruno's innocence allows him to befriend Shmuel.
The Boy in The Striped Pajamas
Unlock
This Answer NowStart your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
The Boy in The Striped Pajamas is narrated by Bruno, a 9-year old boy from Berlin whose father is one of Hitler's esteemed senior officers. Bruno does not understand all the changes to their lives and is unimpressed by the family's move out of Berlin to a "desolate" place; a home with only three storeys and no banister to slide down.
The sarcasm is present in the double-meaning of certain words, mis-pronounced by Bruno. There has been some criticism leveled at John Boyne, the author as, in German, Bruno's first language, the word "fuhrer" could not be mispronounced as "fury." However, to an English reader, Bruno's insistence on referring to "The Fury" is an understandable mistake for a 9-year old and the reference to the "fury" therefore mocks Hitler and everything he stood for.
Similarly, Auschwitz is pronounced "Out-With" by Bruno. To some this serves as an irritation but to others, it reflects an attempt, not to lessen the significance of Auschwitz (although it has been interpreted this way) but to belittle the Nazis for their attempts to stifle and summarily extinguish everything that is Jewish.