Student Question
Can Roger's actions in "Thank You, M'am" be justified? Is Mrs. Jones portrayed negatively?
Quick answer:
Roger's actions in "Thank You, M'am" are not justified as stealing is inherently wrong, but they can be understood. He is portrayed as a neglected child who equates material possessions with love. Mrs. Jones is not portrayed negatively; instead, she empathetically provides Roger with respect, affection, and guidance, potentially deterring him from future crime. While some might argue she should have involved the police, the story emphasizes understanding and compassion.
I’m not sure you can fully justify Roger’s actions, in the sense that stealing is wrong. One can, as Mrs. Jones does, understand them. Roger seems to be a neglected or maltreated child, who sees lack of love and lack of material possessions as somehow connected, and in stealing is trying to acquire one in order to compensate for lack of the other. Mrs. Jones attempts to supply him with the respect and affection he needs, as well as help him get the shoes which symbolize both for him. One could argue that she should simply have turned him into the police – giving him food and money may simply encourage his criminal career, but I don’t think that was Hughes’ point in writing the story.
Get Ahead with eNotes
Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.
Already a member? Log in here.