The Tenant of Wildfell Hall

by Anne Brontë

Start Free Trial

Critical Overview

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

Brontë’s writing talent has long been overshadowed by that of her older sisters, Charlotte and Emily. Although their work was romantic, even gothic, Brontë favored realism in her novels, anticipating the shift in taste that occurred during the nineteenth century. The Tenant of Wildfell Hall was a bestseller in its time, famous for its controversial depictions of oppressive and unhappy marriages as well as the heroine’s courageous effort to free herself. Brontë’s sisters did not approve of her stories, especially Charlotte, who survived all of her siblings and was executor of Brontë’s literary estate. This alone may be the reason The Tenant of Wildfell Hall went out of print and faded from the minds of the reading public.

The Tenant of Wildfell Hall was published in 1848, just one year before Brontë died. She published her works under the pseudonym Acton Bell, and many assumed she was a man. An anonymous critic for the Spectator, in 1848, describes Brontë’s subject as “offensive” and her writing as rough: “The Tenant of Wildfell Hall . . . suggests the idea of considerable abilities ill applied.” The following month, a reviewer for the Literary World writes more favorably of Brontë’s novel, although this person mistakenly attributes Wuthering Heights to Acton Bell. The critic describes the two novels as “crude though powerful productions” and goes on to criticize Brontë’s depiction of Huntington, Markham, and other characters as unrealistic. Nonetheless, the review affirms Brontë’s talent: “[i]t is the writer’s genius which makes his incongruities appear natural.” Interestingly, the reviewer also comments on the favorable reception these two novels have received, despite critical condemnation. The reviewer suspects the author to be a “gifted” woman.

Brontë responded to her critics in the second edition preface of The Tenant of Wildfell Hall:

My object in writing the following pages, was not simply to amuse the Reader, neither was it to gratify my own taste, nor yet to ingratiate myself with the Press and the Public: I wished to tell the truth, for truth always conveys its own moral to those who are able to receive it.

She also deflects the question about her sex, stating, “I am satisfied that if a book is a good one, it is so whatever the sex of the author may be.” This opinion was fairly radical in a time when works produced by women were more leniently judged than those produced by men. The likelihood of not being taken seriously was a reason for adopting a sexually ambiguous pen name.

Just over fifty years later, critics of the twentieth century also gave The Tenant of Wildfell Hall mixed reviews. A reviewer for the New York Times considers it “far from unattractive as a story, and full of moral energy and strong ethical purpose.” But Walter Frewen Lord, writing for the Nineteenth Century in 1903 is disturbed by the casual manner with which the characters dismiss their own brutality toward each other. For instance, Gilbert Markham strikes Mr. Lawrence with a riding crop, nearly killing him, and Mr. Hattersley brutally beats Lord Lowborough. Lord also criticizes Helen Huntington as entirely too “blameless,” which makes her too perfect as a heroine. May Sinclair also complains about Helen’s perfection in her introduction to the 1914 Everyman’s Library edition of the novel. Sinclair describes the novel as “unspeakably and lamentably dull” but still significant because it is “the first attempt in the mid-Victorian novel to handle the relations of a revolting wife to a most revolting husband with anything approaching to a bold sincerity.” It is, in fact, Sinclair declares in conclusion, “the...

(This entire section contains 762 words.)

Unlock this Study Guide Now

Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

first presentment of that Feminist novel which we all know.” Naomi Lewis gives the novel a lukewarm reception in her 1946 review for theNew Statesman & Nation. She writes, “Virtue, not passion, is the powerful motive of the book,” and “The characters have a kind of reality, but they are observed, not felt as the surroundings inevitably are.” “But for all the force of its detail, the book is not great,” Lewis concludes. In 1970, Louis Auchincloss compares Wuthering Heights to The Tenant of Wildfell Hall, noting their similar structures (a story within a story) and sometimes strained methods of imparting information (extensive eavesdropping and diary-keeping), and concludes that although they are not very different, the former succeeded and the latter failed. When the form works, it is praised, and, he concludes, when the form does not work, it “is given more than a fair share of the blame.” In all, critics have continued to have their reservations about this novel.

Previous

Critical Evaluation

Next

Essays and Criticism

Loading...