Last Reviewed on June 19, 2019, by eNotes Editorial. Word Count: 360
In Ronald Dworkin's discussions of jurisprudence in the form of several essays that together compose Taking Rights Seriously (first published in 1977), he posits the existence of a theoretical judge, whom he names Hercules. Dworkin describes Hercules as follows:
We might do well to consider, therefore, how a philosophical judge might develop, in appropriate cases, theories of what legislative purposes and legal principles might require . . . . I have invented, for this purpose, a lawyer of superhuman skill, learning, patience, and acumen, whom I shall call Hercules. I assume that Hercules is a judge in some representative American jurisdiction. I assume that he accepts the main uncontroversial constitutive and regulative rules of the law in his jurisdiction. He accepts, that is, that statues have the general power to create and extinguish legal rights, and that judges have the general duty to follow earlier decisions of their court or higher courts whose rationale, as lawyers say, extends to the case at bar.
Dworkin's hypothetical judge is used to illustrate Dworkin's ideal that law should be based on moral rights—rights for whose existence he argues throughout his work. Dworkin later describes this judge's process as follows:
So Hercules is driven . . . to a process of reasoning that is much like the process of a self-conscious chess referee. He must develop a theory of the constitution, in the shape of a complex set of principles and policies that justify...
(The entire section contains 360 words.)
Unlock This Study Guide Now
Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this Taking Rights Seriously study guide. You'll get access to all of the Taking Rights Seriously content, as well as access to more than 30,000 additional guides and more than 350,000 Homework Help questions answered by our experts.