Analysis

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

Ernst Jünger’s memoir is, on the surface, a straightforward narrative of the author’s personal involvement in four years of brutal combat in the First World War. As a German field officer, Jünger is wounded multiple times on the front and witnesses a level of carnage inconceivable by the standards of previous wars.

The level of detail with which he describes the war is extraordinary. One of the most striking elements of the book is the matter-of-fact tone with which the action of war is recorded. In contrast to what is probably the most famous memoir of World War I, All Quiet on the Western Front, Storm of Steel is not an antiwar narrative. Though Jünger repeatedly states that the mayhem of war is nightmarish and unimaginably horrific, he does so without passing judgment and seemingly without questioning the German cause or the justification for war in general. On the surface at least, his attitude is that of the good soldier who sees warfare as a legitimate human activity or at least a necessary evil.

At times he even seems to revel in the violence. Jünger comes across in his memoir as an effective and remarkably enduring soldier. He is wounded again and again but survives to tell his story. Jünger succeeds in escaping death over and over, against all odds. Many combat veterans, in any war, are disinclined to talk about their experiences in battle. The recollections are too painful, and probably most men who have been through combat have experienced some degree of what is now known as PTSD—Post-traumatic Stress Disorder. 

Jünger is exceptional in his willingness to share every detail of his war story. Moreover, he does so in a way that suggests, perhaps paradoxically, that he has somehow come away from it with a positive impression. This is true in spite of his unsparing descriptions of the terrors of the battlefield and the effects, both physical and psychological, which such a level of organized violence has upon the participants—as well as on the innocent bystanders, the civilians whose homes and livelihoods are destroyed simply because they are in the way of the enormous armies ranged against each other in the uninvited conflict.

Though Jünger was evidently a brilliant man with a phenomenal memory of events (supported by the diary he describes himself keeping), he does not show any awareness of or interest in either the issues that have caused the war or the overall strategy his own side is carrying out in order to facilitate victory. This is emblematic of the fact that the ordinary soldier, and even the lower-ranking officers in the field, are not concerned with these higher-level facts. The overwhelming majority of participants in war never see the big picture. This inescapable truth is faithfully portrayed in Jünger’s account. The larger movements of the armies on the front are not talked about; Jünger only seems cognizant of what is happening in his own immediate sphere, disconnected as it may be from equally significant events elsewhere.

There is, understandably, even less awareness on his part of events in other theaters of the war, such as the Eastern Front. It is as if nothing is taking place beyond the immediate clash of battle Jünger personally witnesses in France and Belgium. Nor is there any mention of the fact that in 1917, the Americans entered the war on the side of the British and French. Nor is there mention that in the same year Russia withdrew from the fighting as a result of the Bolshevik Revolution. It is almost as if Jünger regards the fighting in...

(This entire section contains 991 words.)

Unlock this Study Guide Now

Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

which he takes part as occurring in a vacuum.

What Jünger focuses on, rather, is the blood-soaked battlefield. In doing so, Jünger neither condemns the war nor condones it, except insofar as he celebrates the bravery of men in combat. And beyond this, perhaps his most significant point is that he consciously avoids feeling any enmity, personal or otherwise, to his adversaries in battle. In no way does he come across as a simpleminded nationalist, at least not openly. Yet one wonders if it is possible for any soldier to commit himself to a cause as fully and relentlessly as Jünger does without national pride—without nationalism as an unconscious impulse behind his actions. One senses that this motive must exist on some level, even if a soldier does not express it openly.

If readers of Storm of Steel are to make their own attempt at understanding the attitudes that have compelled Jünger and others to serve so enthusiastically in the Great War, the history of Germany in particular cannot be left out of the equation. Of all the major nations of Europe, Germany was the most recent one to achieve political unification, and in indeed Germany long had a sense of being victimized and deliberately prevented by others, especially Britain and France, from forming a nation-state of their own. It is difficult to understand the peculiarly militaristic mindset of Germany in both World War I and World War II without taking into account this resentful and defensive attitude, which Jünger conveys almost in spite of himself.

At the close of Jünger’s narrative comes the crowning achievement of his service, the Pour le Mérite award—known during the Great War as the “Blue Max”—given to him by the Kaiser. Perhaps the supreme irony is the French wording on the emblem, given that the award was initiated in the eighteenth century by the francophile Prussian King Frederick the Great. The mere fact that Jünger concludes his book, which has chronicled so much mayhem and destruction, with a description of this personal honor is evidence that nationalism, however veiled, is at the center of his thoughts and is one of the principal values expressed in Storm of Steel.

Previous

Characters

Loading...