Stephen Leacock Leacock, Stephen - Essay


(Short Story Criticism)

Stephen Leacock 1869–-1944

(Full name Stephen Butler Leacock) Canadian humorist, short story writer, essayist, biographer, and political economist.

The author of thirty-five volumes of humor and twenty-seven works on history, biography, criticism, economics, and political science, Leacock is best known for satirical sketches that poke fun at human foibles. Leacock's acknowledged masterpiece, Sunshine Sketches of a Little Town, is a collection of related stories that satirize the provinciality and pettiness of the inhabitants of a small Canadian town. It is the best example of his craft, and uses humor to contemplate the incongruities of life as well as human hypocrisy and pretense. The tone of Leacock's other major work, the collection Arcadian Adventures with the Idle Rich, is slightly darker but still uses amiable humor to attack corruption, self-interest, and concern with money and power in big city in North America. Leacock's conservative political stance is reflected in his humorous sketches of individualism, materialism, and worship of technology. Leacock's distinctive comic style, with its combination of British nonsense humor and understatement and American wit and exaggeration, made him the most popular humorist writing in English between 1910 and 1925. However, for many years his literary importance was overlooked by scholars, and some commentators considered his work lacking in seriousness and complexity. Critical reevaluation of his work has shifted this opinion, earning Leacock the reputation of Canada's comic master. Author and critic J. B. Priestly found Leacock's humor to express an essential Canadian quality, and the novelist Robertson Davies has called him “a humorist of distinguished gifts, with a range and brilliance not often equaled.”

Biographical Information

Leacock was born in 1869 in Hampshire, England. In 1876 he moved with his family to a 100-acre farm a few miles south of Lake Simcoe near the village of Sutton, Ontario. Life on the farm with his ten brothers and sisters was strenuous. Leacock's father's heavy drinking, wanderings, and eventual disappearance compounded the family's financial difficulties. Leacock's mother, however, was determined to give her children a good education, and Leacock attended Upper Canada College in Toronto. Leacock then entered the University of Toronto on scholarship in 1887 to study modern and classical languages and literature. However, his studies were cut short because his mother needed financial assistance to help raise eight siblings. In 1888 Leacock enrolled in a three-month training course to qualify for teaching high school. After his training he taught first at Oxbridge High School then at Upper Canada College—an engagement that allowed him to continue his studies at the University of Toronto—where he completed his B.A. in 1891.

After earning his degree, Leacock began publishing humorous articles in periodicals. His first piece appeared in the Toronto humor magazine Grip, in 1894. He continued to publish humorous sketches in Canadian and American magazines throughout the 1890s. Leacock's interest in the writings of Thorsten Veblen led him to pursue graduate studies in political science and economics under Veblen at the University of Chicago in 1899. While a student at Chicago, Leacock married Beatrix Hamilton, an aspiring actress from Toronto. He completed his Ph.D. in 1903 and began lecturing at McGill University in Montreal. He was appointed full professor and chair of the political science and economics department in 1908, a post he held until his retirement in 1936.

In 1910, with the financial assistance of his brother George, Leacock published Literary Lapses, a collection of previously published writings. The volume sold extremely well and was followed the next year with Nonsense Novels, a compilation of parodies of some of the most popular genres of literature, which established his fame. In 1912 Leacock published Sunshine Sketches of Little Town, a work based in part on his summers spent in Orillia and on his own childhood experiences. It was immensely popular in Canada and the United States, and cemented Leacock's reputation as the foremost humorist in Canada. Arcadian Adventures with the Idle Rich, published in 1914 was also a major critical and popular success. In 1925, Leacock's wife died of breast cancer, and he thereafter committed himself to fundraising drives for cancer research.

Leacock also enjoyed a distinguished career as an academic, publishing works in political science, history, and economics and lecturing widely in Canada and abroad. He was known as a great lecturer and raconteur. Leacock also wrote two biographies, Mark Twain, and Charles Dickens, His Life and Work. In 1935, he published Humour: Its Theory and Technique. After his retirement from McGill in 1936 Leacock went on a speaking tour in the west of Canada. The notes and speeches made on this month-long journey were published in My Discovery of the West: A Discussion of East and West in Canada, for which he won the Governor General's Award. In the following years, Leacock wrote various books about Canada, including Canada: The Foundations of Its Future, Montreal: Seaport and City, and Canada and the Sea. In late 1943 Leacock began writing his autobiography, but his work was cut short due to failing health. He was diagnosed with throat cancer in late 1943 and died on March 28, 1944.

Major Works of Short Fiction

Most of Leacock's collections of stories include pieces that appeared previously in various magazines. The pieces in his first published work, Literary Lapses, include stories, anecdotes, monologues, dialogues, parodies of literary works, and reflections on a variety of topics. The volume is full of lighthearted nonsense stories as well as one of Leacock's best-known and more serious pieces, “My Financial Career,” about a prototypical “little man” confronted by a an intimidating institution as he opens a bank account. In the story, Leacock treats with characteristic sympathy the honest and decent but powerless victim of an absurd and hostile world. Leacock's second volume, Nonsense Novels, a collection of burlesques of the popular fiction of his day, continues in the vein of the first collection. Among its inspired absurdities are the much-anthologized story “Gertrude the Governess; or, Simple Seventeen,” in which the hero Lord Ronald is said to have “flung himself upon his horse and rode madly off in all directions.”

Leacock's two most important works stand apart from his other books of humor in their artistic unity and seriousness of purpose, as they move from burlesque and absurdity to more ambitious satire. Both are collections of interrelated stories about lives in fictional towns. In Sunshine Sketches of a Little Town, Leacock's masterpiece, the narrator sets a tone of genial deprecation and bemusement as he comments on this lives of the inhabitants of Mariposa, with all their self-importance, pretensions, and hypocrisy. He barely conceals his glee at their follies and imperfections, but in the end the manner of the stories is kindly even as it depicts human weakness and imperfection. The most famous piece in the volume is “L'Envoi: The Train to Mariposa,” in which former residents, now urbanized, remember their “sunshine town.” The story captures Leacock's concern for the passing of human communities and the dangers that accompany the embracing of new technology and materialism. Arcadian Adventures with the Idle Rich, Leacock's second important volume, dissects life in an American city with sharper satire, and his portraits of corruption and self-deception have a sharp edge of criticism not found in Sunshine Sketches. The two collections together reveal Leacock's nostalgia and regret for the passing of simpler times and his concern for what results when human social ties are undermined by materialism.

Leacock produced hundreds of sketches in more than a dozen volumes of short fiction, but none have enjoyed the popularity or critical acclaim of Sunshine Sketches and Arcadian Adventures. Some critics have maintained that Leacock's work showed little sign of intellectual or artistic development after these two successes. Many of his later pieces, like those in his first two volumes, are exuberant nonsense, parodies, or light sketches that undermine popular stereotypes, ideas, institutions, and personalities. However, he did continue to produce excellent sketches throughout his career, notably “The Great Detective,” which parodies the detective-story genre, and “Boom Times,” a fictional story about this uncle, E. P. Leacock.

Critical Reception

Leacock enjoyed enormous popular success with his short stories and sketches. Beginning with the publication of short pieces in magazines, he quickly found a large audience that appreciated his down-to-earth comic sensibility with its elements of silliness and absurdity. After the publication of Nonsense Novels, Leacock became North America's most popular humorist. After the publication of this book, Leacock published about one book of humor a year. Reviewers as well as readers appreciated his work, although some complained that his sketches relied too heavily on formula for their comic effect. Scholarly interest in Leacock's stories was minimal in the years following his death, and many who did study his work felt a sense of unfulfilled potential in his work. Some critics argued that because of his impoverished childhood Leacock felt he had to use uncritically the formulas that brought him commercial success. Others speculated that his insistence on using only kindly humor arrested his development as an artist. They suggested that Leacock backed away from the darker and more cynical view of humanity that is latent in Arcadian Adventures and returned instead to the lighthearted optimism of his earlier works. His inability to develop his pessimistic vision of humanity in the industrial age, it was argued, served to thwart his full development as an artist. Beginning in the 1960s, critics began to reassess Leacock's place in Canadian literature, and many found his work, particularly the pieces in Sunshine Sketches and Arcadian Adventures, to be more serious and modern than had been formerly perceived. Critical interest in Leacock's work has tended to concentrate on Sunshine Sketches, and scholars have examined the tales to understand, among other things, Leacock's use of satire, the relationship of the narrator to Leacock himself, and the unity of structure among the sketches. Other subjects of interest to critics of Leacock's work have been the persona of the “little man” or “common uncommon man” in his works and his ironic intent.

Principal Works

(Short Story Criticism)

Literary Lapses: A Book of Sketches 1910

Nonsense Novels 1911

Sunshine Sketches of a Little Town 1912

Behind the Beyond, and Other Contributions to Human Knowledge 1913

Arcadian Adventures with the Idle Rich 1914

Further Foolishness: Sketches and Satires on the Follies of the Day 1916

Frenzied Fiction 1918

The Hohenzollerns in America, with the Bolsheviks in Berlin and Other Impossibilities 1919

Winsome Winnie and Other New Nonsense Novels 1920

The Garden of Folly 1924


(The entire section is 198 words.)

The Spectator (review date 1912)

(Short Story Criticism)

SOURCE: “Sunshine Sketches of a Little Town,” in The Spectator, Vol. 109, No. 4391, August 24, 1912, pp. 277-78.

[In the following review of Sunshine Sketches of a Little Town, the critic calls the work an “exhilarating volume” that breaks new ground as Leacock moves away from “irresponsible fantasies and burlesques” to works that show a fresh and familiar look at humanity.]

Mr. Stephen Leacock, in a delightful autobiographical preface to his new volume, tells us that many of his friends are under the erroneous impression that he writes his humorous nothings in idle moments when the wearied brain is unable to perform the serious labours of the...

(The entire section is 1863 words.)

Will Cuppy (review date 1929)

(Short Story Criticism)

SOURCE: “Leacock at Large,” in New York Herald Tribune Books, Vol. 12, No. 6, December 1, 1929, p. 40.

[In the following review of The Iron Man and the Tin Woman, With Other Such Futurities, Cuppy remarks that the tales contain a great deal of satiric intent but that they allow for serious thinking between laughs.]

Anything by Stephen Leacock has the very considerable advantage to start with of being by Stephen Leacock. Otherwise Mr. Leacock doesn't seem to do very much about it here lately—and why, his legions of fans may well ask, should he? Isn't he the granddaddy of most of the young speed demons whose humorous essays. If faster and more furious, are...

(The entire section is 771 words.)

D. A. Cameron (essay date 1965)

(Short Story Criticism)

SOURCE: “The Enchanted Houses: Leacock's Irony,” in Canadian Literature, No. 23, Winter, 1965, pp. 31-44.

[In the following essay, Cameron examines how Leacock sees the characters and their actions in Sunshine Sketches.]

Critical discussions of Stephen Leacock's Sunshine Sketches of a Little Town revolve about two central questions, upon each of which the critics are sharply divided. The first of these deals with the book's distinctive flavour: is it sharply satiric, or is it composed of kind and fundamentally affectionate comedy? The second question is concerned more with characterization and structure, and with the mind and motives of Leacock himself, the...

(The entire section is 5776 words.)

Douglas Mantz (review date 1977)

(Short Story Criticism)

SOURCE: “The Preposterous and the Profound: A New Look at the Envoi of Sunshine Sketches,” in Journal of Canadian Fiction, No. 19, 1977, pp. 95-105.

[In the following essay, Mantz urges us to read Leacock not only for his genial nonsense or bitter satire but for his “ontological awareness”; he then examines the envoi in Sunshine Sketches of a Little Town to show how Leacock moves toward the profound by way of the commonplace.]

“Personally, I would sooner have written Alice in Wonderland than the whole Encyclopedia Britannica.1 This remark, in the preface to Sunshine Sketches, suggests Leacock should be taken...

(The entire section is 6471 words.)

Ina Ferris (essay date 1978)

(Short Story Criticism)

SOURCE: “The Face in the Window: Sunshine Sketches Reconsidered,” Studies in Canadian Literature, Vol. 3, No. 2, Summer, 1978, pp. 178-85.

[In the following essay, Ferris argues that Sunshine Sketches of Little Town is a more serious and modern work than commentators have perceived and that the power of the work is found in its narrative voice. However, Ferris also points out that Leacock fails to develop the sketches to their full artistic potential.]

In the final chapter of Sunshine Sketches of a Little Town, the narrator turns to a “you” who is simultaneously himself and the reader and offers this advice: “No, don't bother to look at...

(The entire section is 3662 words.)

T. D. MacLulich (essay date 1979)

(Short Story Criticism)

SOURCE: “Mariposa Revisited,” in Studies in Canadian Literature, Vol. 4, No. 1, Winter, 1979, pp. 167-76.

[In the following essay, MacLulich responds to the critic Ina Ferris's assessment of Sunshine Sketches of Little Town, arguing that the collection does not show that Leacock lacked faith in his imaginative power as Ferris claims.]

In her article “The Face in the Window: Sunshine Sketches Reconsidered” (Studies in Canadian Literature, 3 [Summer 1978], 178-85), Ina Ferris draws a provocative conclusion. She argues that the ending of Sunshine Sketches shows that Leacock lacked faith in his own imaginative powers:


(The entire section is 4039 words.)

Beverly Raspovich (essay date 1981)

(Short Story Criticism)

SOURCE: “The Leacock Persona and the Canadian Character,” in Mosaic, Vol. XIV, No. 2, Spring, 1981, pp. 77-92.

[In the following essay, Raspovich examines the “little man” or “uncommon common man” persona in some of Leacock's most important works, including Sunshine Sketches of a Little Town, Arcadian Adventures with the Idle Rich, and Behind the Beyond.]

Because Canada has often been interpreted as a puritan and sober culture—a country where survival has depended on hard work and where celebration has been at a premium—Canadian humor has seemed almost not to exist. In fact, among Canadians, “the myth of the mirthless Canadian” is a...

(The entire section is 7785 words.)

Francis Zichy (essay date 1987)

(Short Story Criticism)

SOURCE: “The Narrator, the Reader, and the Mariposa: The Cost of Preserving the Status Quo in Sunshine Sketches of a Little Town,” in Journal of Canadian Studies, Vol. 22, No. 1 Spring, 1987, pp. 51-65.

[In the following essay, Zichy argues that a “special kind of equivocation” on the part of the narrator rules in Sunshine Sketches of a Little Town, and that the work's purpose is not to satirize the town of Mariposa but to convince the narrator himself that the town, with all its faults, is the best world after all.]

Since the first signs of a considered criticism of Leacock's comic writing in the late 1950s, much of the discussion of Sunshine...

(The entire section is 8097 words.)

Further Reading

(Short Story Criticism)


Spadoni, Carl. Stephen Leacock: A Bibliography. Toronto: ECW Press, 1998. 622 p.

Detailed record of all of Leacock's published work, including details on their publication history, plus a listing of secondary sources.


Davies, Robertson. Stephen Leacock. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1970. 63 p.

Short appraisal of Leacock's life and work by a well-known Canadian fiction writer.


Lynch, Gerald. Stephen Leacock: Humour and Humanity, Montreal: McGill's-Queen's University Press, 1988, 211 p.


(The entire section is 201 words.)