The Star of Seville

by Lope de Vega Carpio

Start Free Trial

Critical Evaluation

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

With the reasoning that The Star of Seville is an excellent play and Lope de Vega Carpio was an excellent playwright, people have believed for centuries that the play is the work of Vega Carpio; however, modern scholars have taken a closer look at the two extant versions and have begun to doubt his authorship. The play is unlike dramas that Vega Carpio is known to have written. Whoever the author may have been, he produced a masterpiece of the Spanish Golden Age.

The Star of Seville is frequently cited as the best example of the Spanish honor play, a form popular during that country’s Golden Age of drama and related to similar productions in France and England during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. It is no surprise that The Star of Seville was long thought to be the work of Vega Carpio, since that popular and prolific playwright wrote a number of dramas characteristic of the genre. The interest in grand themes and in characters whose actions could determine the fate of a city, a kingdom, or an empire seems to have gripped audiences throughout Europe.

No audience or reader of The Star of Seville can appreciate the play without a sound understanding of the importance of honor in sixteenth and seventeenth century Spain. The term “honor” had both private and public meanings, and Don Sancho’s predicament is a perfect example of the problems that arise from the demands of private and public honor. Honor regulated all social relationships: those between king and subject, between superior and inferior, between friend and friend, and between family members. It lay at the root of all personal transactions and established a foundation for social interactions. Upholding one’s honor took precedence over personal satisfaction and over other commitments one might make. Such an attitude may seem extreme to succeeding generations, but it served as the informing principle of the society depicted in The Star of Seville.

Similarly, for the first audiences who viewed this play, the king remained a figure of paramount importance in their lives, and people believed in the special privileges of monarchs, who, when acting as heads of state, were not subject to the laws that governed ordinary individuals. That idea, coupled with the belief that the sovereign was protected by God and enjoyed special favors from God, made it possible for Sancho the Brave to act with impunity. The assumption was that the king would always act in accord with the dictates of honor. When he did not, the potential for chaos hovered over society and served as the breeding ground for tragedy. Such is the situation that the author of The Star of Seville dramatizes in his play.

The admirable male characters in the play, Bustos Tabera and Sancho Ortiz, believe in honor as a quality inherent in the individual and earned through deeds. Not surprisingly, their adherence to this demanding code of behavior leads them into conflict with the king, who has a very different sense of how his subjects should behave. Hence, when Sancho offers Bustos a key military appointment, Bustos refuses because he is not worthy, making it impossible for the king to use the commission as a bribe for Bustos’s cooperation in the king’s seduction of Estrella. Sancho is forced to use other means to gain his evil end. Similarly, Don Sancho is quick to agree to be the king’s emissary in eliminating the purported traitor; he never questions the king’s motives, and even though he is distraught at having to kill the brother of his betrothed, he carries out his promise rather...

(This entire section contains 1582 words.)

See This Study Guide Now

Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this study guide. You'll also get access to more than 30,000 additional guides and more than 350,000 Homework Help questions answered by our experts.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

than stain his honor. The king refuses to come to Don Sancho’s aid when the citizens of Seville demand the killer’s execution, so Sancho nearly loses his life for a deed he committed as a matter of honor.

The king and his confidant Don Arias possess a different notion of honor. For the king, the blind allegiance of his subjects to this code of behavior permits him to use them for his personal pleasure. Don Arias, ever present with words of advice, urges the king on in his plot to satisfy his passion for Estrella by taking advantage of the high-minded notions of men such as Don Bustos and Don Sancho. One of the great ironies of the drama is that the king makes glib promises, often in writing, to a number of people who fail to benefit from them because the king is unwilling to admit his evildoing when these individuals face punishment and death. For the king, as it is for William Shakespeare’s Falstaff, honor is but a word.

In The Star of Seville, the concept of honor is saved by the citizens of Seville, who force the king to admit publicly his role in the murder of Don Bustos, thereby halting the execution of Don Sancho. Through the heroic stance of the mayor and city elders, who defy the king’s efforts to bribe them to set Sancho free, the king is made to act in accordance with the principles that should govern the behavior of rulers and admit his role in the murder. It is not clear that the king is actually changed by his actions, but at least Sancho is spared and the citizenry reassured that social justice is still possible in their city.

Modern audiences may have difficulty with the way in which women are portrayed in The Star of Seville. Estrella is little more than an object to be bargained for. She enters into the action of the play only rarely, most notably in the scene in which she pardons Don Sancho for killing her brother. As a symbol of constancy and an object for evoking sympathy, she is well drawn. She remains, however, little more than an appendage to the central moral action, which involves the male figures only.

At the time of the play’s writing, Spain was the most powerful nation on earth. Despite this power, the country was still under the influence of medieval superstitions and customs. The Spanish Inquisition had purged the land of heretics and infidels. Silver was pouring into the king’s coffers. The war with the Moors was still fresh in the memory of the people. Duels were fought every day. The Star of Seville is a reflection of the ethical and moral concerns of the time. Abstractions such as honor and corruption presented themselves to the people of the time with an immediacy like that seen in the play.

The theme of fatalism is also central to the play. The thinking of the time was, in comparison to modern times, very religious. It was widely accepted that God is supreme and the ultimate reality. God allows evil and mischance to enter one’s life, but nothing is hopeless because God is the rewarder of the faithful. Miraculous and accidental events govern people’s lives and circumstances. Given this condition, one must be resigned to fate.

In The Star of Seville, stars are an important metaphor for fate. The play refers to the stars many times and dramatically portrays the intervention of the stars in people’s lives. Estrella (whose name is Spanish for “star”) denies the influence of the stars in her life as long as things appear to be going in the direction that she desires. As soon as her wishes are thwarted, by the killing of her brother by her lover, she gives vent to her grief and declares that her star is on the decline. Estrella, known as the Star of Seville, is so beautiful and bright that her influence is enough to change the lives of all the men who love or desire her—her brother, her lover, and even the king.

The king further portrays the belief that ultimately all things are in God’s hands. Monarchs are appointed by God and are accountable only to God. The duty and responsibility of any loyal subject is to obey the king. One of the king’s men reminds him that the staves of his office point to God and signify the king’s accountability to God, but if the staves are bent, they point to humanity. Herein lies the king’s dilemma: He cannot be true to God and also achieve his heart’s desire.

In the character of Don Sancho Ortiz the audience sees the terrible consequences of loyalty and obedience to the king. Don Sancho knows he must kill his friend or disobey his monarch. He struggles with his conscience until he finally rationalizes that the king is accountable to God alone and he, Don Sancho, is accountable to the king. In this way he resolves the conflict and does the king’s bidding.

The people of Seville believe they are like pawns in a giant chess game, with outside forces moving them to and fro, without malice, wreaking havoc in their lives. Morbid humor is displayed in several scenes, notably in the third act, in which the disguised king tries to break into Estrella and Don Bustos’s house and is caught. Another humorous scene occurs when Don Sancho and Clarindo debate upon hell, or “the other world,” where all professions are represented except lawyers. Don Sancho asks why there are no lawyers and is told it is because they would bring lawsuits if they were there. He then says, “If there are no lawsuits . . . hell’s not so bad.”