The Star Summary

(Comprehensive Guide to Short Stories, Critical Edition)

Download The Star Study Guide

Subscribe Now

The unnamed narrator, a Jesuit priest, is the astrophysicist on an exploratory scientific spacecraft. He is constantly reminded of this duality by his shipmates and by the very decorations and features of his room. The Jesuit speaks throughout the story to an unnamed “you” who is often unknown, sometimes himself, at times St. Ignatius Loyola (founder of the Jesuits), and finally, God. The narrator’s several brief asides show his distress over something the ship has discovered.

The ship has come to the Phoenix Nebula, the remains of a star that became a supernova, to try to reconstruct the events that led up to the catastrophe and, if possible, to learn its cause. Expecting to find only the burned star, the ship makes a much more exciting, and ultimately poignant, discovery. The last planet of the star’s system survived the burning, and an artifact is sending out a beacon from its surface. Although untrained for this unexpected archaeological work, the crew enthusiastically sets out to discover what secrets and treasures have been waiting through the centuries for discovery and rescue.

A monolithic marker leads the men to the hopes of the race doomed by the supernova, a civilization that knew it was about to die and had made a last bid for immortality. The artifact contains artwork, recordings, and written works, including keys for their translation. It also contains photographs of beautiful cities and happy children playing on beaches under the then-quiet sun. Although the vanished people most likely left only their best, as the narrator acknowledges they had a right to do, their remains show the men from Earth a civilization that could reach neighboring planets, that possessed beauty and culture, but that ran out of time and was destroyed on the brink of interstellar travel, which might have allowed some of its people to survive. To add to the sorrow the men feel, the race looks humanlike, inviting even more empathy.

The men, who teased their astrophysicist on the journey to the nebula about his religious beliefs, ask him how such destruction can be reconciled with God’s mercy. The Jesuit tries to accept this questioning and answer it, but cannot. He wonders if even St. Ignatius could have reconciled this situation, although he recognizes that God has no need to justify his actions to humankind. When, as the ship’s astrophysicist, he makes his calculations, he finds something that severely tests his own deep faith. He calculates the date of the supernova and when its light reached the Earth.

The reason for the narrator’s doubt and seeming despair becomes clear in the final line of the story. Every day stars go nova and every day races die, but this tragedy has a horrific irony for the theologian: “What was the need to give these people to the fire, that the symbol of their passing might shine above Bethlehem?”


(Beacham's Guide to Literature for Young Adults)

The story's protagonist is identified only as Father. A Jesuit priest, he is also the astrophysicist on a space mission that has made a discovery which causes him to have a crisis of faith.

This story is a quintessential example of Clarke's writing style and subject matter; it is to be recommended as a quick (though not easy) read in comparison to his novels. It is succinct and straightforward, unlike some of the works in his short story collections. Many of Clarke's beliefs about the role of humanity in the universe and the future are made manifest in this story. However, they are only mentioned briefly and as "givens" rather than statements. For example, the protagonist is a Jesuit, but he does not make long explanations of how prevalent or active religious faith is in this future time.

Clarke's Third Law is manifest in this story. He claimed repeatedly, at many science fiction conventions, that "Any technology, sufficiently advanced, is indistinguishable from magic." While some writers feel each and every technological idea in their stories must be accountable according to state-of-the-art science, Clarke is...

(The entire section is 1,169 words.)