Social Darwinism and the Gospel of Wealth

Start Free Trial

Discussion Topic

The concept and premise of Andrew Carnegie's "Gospel of Wealth."

Summary:

Andrew Carnegie's "Gospel of Wealth" argues that the wealthy have a moral obligation to distribute their excess wealth in ways that promote the welfare and happiness of the common man. He emphasizes that the rich should act as stewards of their wealth, using it to support public institutions and initiatives that improve society rather than leaving it to their descendants.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

What is the concept of Carnegie's "gospel of wealth"?

Andrew Carnegie was a famous industrialist who became one of the richest men in America. Hailing originally from a poor background in Scotland, Carnegie immigrated with his family to the United States at the age of thirteen. With his insatiable intellectual curiosity and seemingly inexhaustible capacity for hard work, Carnegie worked his way up from the bottom to achieve untold wealth and success.

In 1901, at the age of 66, Carnegie sold his Pittsburgh steel company to J.P. Morgan for the astonishing sum of $480 million, making him the richest man in America. Long before this, he'd already established a reputation as a generous philanthropist, donating vast sums of his enormous fortune to a variety of charitable causes. This was an example of what Carnegie called, in a famous newspaper article, "The Gospel of Wealth."

What he meant by this is that wealthy people, such as himself, had a social responsibility to use their wealth to help those less fortunate than themselves. The rich should not lead extravagant lifestyles; their surplus wealth would be put to much better use if it were put back into society through philanthropic ventures. Yet Carnegie was at pains to point out that philanthropy should be used to help the poor and underprivileged improve their lives, not to simply give them hand-outs that would do nothing for them in the long-term. To that end, Carnegie founded a number of libraries and educational institutions, which he believed would be the engine of social mobility.

Approved by eNotes Editorial
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

What is the premise of Andrew Carnegie’s “Gospel of Wealth”?

Andrew Carnegie makes no qualms about being wealthy and prosperous in the industrial capitalist world of early Twentieth Century America.  In many respects, he need not offer apologies.  Carnegie started his journey to the top one percent at the bottom of the socio-economic pyramid.  What is clear from the essay is that Carnegie is a proponent of the notion of Social Darwinism, or "survival of the fittest" applied in the socio-economic realm.  He feels that the wealthy are the superior members of the society and have earned their money through talent and hard work.  Where Carnegie departs from the camp of the Social Darwinists is in his belief in philanthropy.  The Gospel of Wealth is fairly critical of those individuals that die wealthy.  He forwards the belief that it is the responsibility of the wealthy to help the lower classes.  He does not advocate almsgiving as he feels that the poor cannot adequately make decisions about what to do with these handouts.  Carnegie suggests using wealth to create opportunities for the inferior classes to make self-improvement.  Carnegie believes that building libraries, universities, and museums with personal wealth will somewhat level the playing field between the classes.  

References

Approved by eNotes Editorial
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

What is Andrew Carnegie's Gospel of Wealth article saying?

In Andrew Carnegie’s article "The Gospel of Wealth," Carnegie discusses the proper ways to deal with inequality in wealth. He starts off by discussing how inequality in society formed, noting that in earlier societies, leaders and their followers lived essentially the same lives. He goes on to say that innovations in management and technology gradually led to a civilization where both laborers and the owners of production have better lives than in earlier societies, but the improvement for the laborers was much smaller than for the owners of production. This occurred because manufacturing improved over time, lowering the cost of goods and improving quality. Those who owned the manufacturing concerns gradually accumulated wealth and created more production capacity. Carnegie believes that this is the natural state of things. Either an enterprise produces profit and grows, enriching the owners, or it produces losses and shrinks, making the owners poorer. This naturally leads to a society where there are the poor laborers and the rich production owners. He feels there is nothing wrong with this and, in fact, that this competition makes life better for everyone by driving innovation and reducing the cost of goods. After this point, Carnegie focuses on the best ways the wealthy can distribute their money.

Carnegie believes there are three ways the wealthy can do this: give their money to their family upon their death, pass it to the state in the form of estate taxes, or administer it during their lives for the public good. He believes that giving it to family is a poor way to distribute the money because it will make family members live a life of idleness, which is bad for them in the competitive society that Carnegie believes is natural. Thus, he thinks that estate taxes should be very high to discourage this, as the state could use the money better than the family. In turn, he believes that this will encourage the wealthy to administer their money during their lives for the betterment of society, because they can control where the money goes. This charitable giving solves inequality, while not subverting what Carnegie believes to be the natural state of production. Carnegie calls this his Gospel of Wealth.

References

Approved by eNotes Editorial
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Andrew Carnegie believed in the concept of the Gospel of Wealth. Carnegie believed there was nothing wrong with people making a lot of money. These people shouldn’t be ashamed of themselves for being successful. However, because some wealthy people believed in the concept of Social Darwinism, the rich often appeared to be greedy and unsympathetic to those who were less fortunate. Social Darwinism believes in the concept of survival of the fittest. If somebody isn’t able to make it economically or financially in the world, that was just too bad for that person even though the reasons for their lack of success may not be their fault. The Gospel of Wealth was a concept used to soften the harshness of Social Darwinism. The Gospel of Wealth was a philosophy that the wealthy had an obligation to be charitable. The wealthy needed to use their good fortunate to promote social progress and to help the less fortunate. This principle led to many charitable donations being made to help communities throughout the country to improve conditions for all of the citizens. These donations could be used to establish parks, libraries, and art centers. The Gospel of Wealth was a way for the rich to share their fortune by benefiting the rest of society in various ways.

Get Ahead with eNotes

Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.

Get 48 Hours Free Access
Approved by eNotes Editorial