Social Sciences

Start Free Trial

What are the similarities and differences between cultural relativism and ethnocentrism?

Quick answer:

One similarity between cultural relativism and ethnocentrism is that both are a way of interpreting different cultures. The differences relate to whether or not you cast judgment on other cultures and consider them inferior to your own.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

To answer this question, we need to start by defining both cultural relativism and ethnocentrism.

Ethnocentrism is the belief that the set of values and beliefs to which you ascribe is superior to others. In other words, it is the belief that the way of life you follow holds the high ground.

Cultural relativism, on the other hand, is being able to understand a culture without casting judgment or aspersions onto it based on the standards of your own culture.

I would therefore argue that the similarities between ethnocentrism and cultural relativism relate to the fact that both are connected to the way we view cultures other than our own.

The biggest difference is that while being ethnocentric has negative connotations, cultural relativism has positive ones. Ethnocentrism involves a lack of open-mindedness and arrogance. By deciding that one culture is superior to another, you are making a judgment call. A cultural relativist, on the other hand, will not make that judgment call and will simply seek to obtain an objective understanding of a culture and what it stands for.

In a nutshell, ethnocentrism looks at the world through a lens of one's own culture and beliefs, whereas cultural relativism looks at the world through a neutral and objective lens.

Approved by eNotes Editorial
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Ethnocentrism and cultural relativism have a few things in common but are quite different attitudes in thinking about culture.

Ethnocentrism, as a term, can be understood by breaking it into two parts. The first, "ethno," implies ethnicity or nationality. "-Centrism" is the idea that something is central to experience or perhaps is the most important factor in a person's perspective. Altogether, ethnocentrism is the attitude that one's own cultural, ethnic, or national experience is the hegemonic experience or the most important. Often, when people act or think in a way that is ethnocentric, they aren't doing so on purpose—a lack of contact with alternate cultural experiences hasn't "opened their eyes," so to speak. On the other hand, people can quite willfully engage in ethnocentrism by asserting that their way of life is better or more important than all others'.

Cultural relativism is a framework popular in philosophy, morality studies, and anthropology. This idea asserts that any particular act, object, feeling, or belief only makes sense in the context of the culture in which it originates. That is, cultural practices must be understood and respected as part of their culture, even if someone disagrees with the practice. A great example of cultural relativism can be drawn from talking about differing food taboos from around the world. Many Westerners are grossed out by the idea of eating insects, snakes, or animals like squirrels or turtles. These are common food items throughout the world, however, so I respect that other people want to eat bugs, even though I don't.

Cultural relativism and ethnocentrism both rely on a cognitive dissonance between "Us" and "Them." It is easy to fool ourselves into thinking that culture, especially our own, is a very fixed phenomena and anything that isn't a part of our culture simply falls into the realm of Other. While this kind of thinking is easy to do, it isn't necessarily true or helpful. Culture exists more like a grab-bag of beliefs and behaviors that evolve throughout time. An Us vs Them mentality is not likely to foster understanding or positive discourse. With ethnocentrism, I think it is quite obviously problematic to consider one's own culture as the only or the best way for things to be. Even cultural relativism is problematic because it does not encourage a discussion of the true value of cultural practices or give attention to the fact that our own feelings about certain beliefs or behaviors, while valid, are also culturally constructed.

In short, cultural relativism and ethnocentrism are similar in their use in the humanities, reliance on an Us vs Them mentality, and the fact that they are quite limiting frameworks. Neither idea encourages open, unbiased discussions about culture.

Approved by eNotes Editorial
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Cultural relativism and ethnocentrism are similar in that they are both practices that try to understand and explain the beliefs and behaviors of other cultures. However, these two viewpoints differ significantly. Cultural relativism acknowledges that moral and ethical systems differ from one culture to the other and hence what is considered moral in one culture could be considered immoral in another cultural setting. Therefore, there is an objective analysis of behavior and practices free of comparisons with one’s own culture. Cultural relativism asserts that there is no universal standard for measuring morality and therefore no one has the right to judge other people’s cultures. In fact, cultural relativists state that all cultures are of equal value.

Ethnocentrism on the other hand involves the subjective analysis of another culture based on the standards of one’s own culture. This perspective holds the belief that one’s culture and value system are inherently superior to those of other cultures. It also seeks to distinguish different ethnicities based on their unique practices and come up with specific cultural identities.

Approved by eNotes Editorial
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

For the most part, there is very little that is similar between these ideas.  The only major similarity they share is the fact that they are both meant as ways to evaluate and judge cultures other than our own.  Ethnocentrism is the practice of judging other cultures based on our own values.  In other words, it is the practice of saying that our way is right and other cultures are wrong whenever they stray from our way.  Cultural relativism, by contrast, judges cultures based on their own values.  It is the practice of saying that basically anything that a culture believes in is right.  In this view, no culture is better than any other--they are just different.

In this way, these are both methods of judging other cultures, but they are very different methods of doing so.

Approved by eNotes Editorial
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Compare and contrast the terms ethnocentrism and cultural relativism.

Ethnocentrism and cultural relativism do not have much in common.  Ethnocentric ideas tend to negate the possiblity of a belief in cultural relativism.

Ethnocentrism is the idea that the way things are done in our society is superior to any other way of doing things.  This sort of an attitude is clearly incompatible with cultural relativism.  Cultural relativism holds that nothing is right or wrong and that things only have whatever value is given to them by a particular culture.  In such a view, the traditions of all cultures are equally valid.

Ethnocentrism is a view that holds that one's own society is better than all others.  This is completely opposed to the idea that all cultures are equally valid.

See eNotes Ad-Free

Start your 48-hour free trial to get access to more than 30,000 additional guides and more than 350,000 Homework Help questions answered by our experts.

Get 48 Hours Free Access
Last Updated on