Last Updated on September 6, 2023, by eNotes Editorial. Word Count: 852
Author Liam O’Flaherty examines war’s devastating effects on men through description, characterization, symbolism, and a limited third-person narrative style.
O’Flaherty’s presentation of graphic details does not glamorize violence. Instead, visual, tactile, and auditory imagery emphasize visceral pain and fatal destruction. After the sniper is shot, he sees the bullet’s entry hole, surmises that it is lodged in his bone, bends his arm unnaturally, and feels excruciating pain. The bullet, a symbol of war‚ becomes part of the sniper. The experience of war becomes part of men’s bodies and psyches.
Later, O’Flaherty describes the enemy’s death in an almost cinematic, slow-motion style that lingers on and highlights the grotesque violence.
He was reeling over the parapet in his death agony. He struggled to keephis feet, but he was slowly falling forward as if in a dream…Then thedying man on the roof crumpled up and fell forward. The body turnedover and over in space and hit the ground with a dull thud. Then it laystill.
Again, the author uses elaborate details to visualize the dying man’s tortured final movements. His falling seems almost unreal. The image of a body repeatedly turning over in descent extends and complicates his deadly fall. The sickening “dull thud” as the body hits the ground abruptlyseparates life (motion) and death (stillness).
Through his characterization of the sniper, O’Flaherty emphasizes war’s emotional and mental effects. To succeed as an assassin, the sniper must be impersonal and cold. The author introduces the sniper as a young, disciplined, cold, and fanatical killer “who is used to looking at death.” The sniper shoots his human targets (i.e., the man in the turret and the old woman) without remorse.
When the sniper does feel emotion, it is in anticipation of killing. When he hears the enemy car’s motor, “his heart beat faster” because he is pumped with adrenaline to attack. Later, when he prepares to shoot the enemy on the other rooftop, he smiles, and his hand trembles “with eagerness.” After confirming that he hit the enemy, he utters “a cry of joy.”
Only after this shooting does O’Flaherty suggest that war perhaps has not entirely erased the sniper’s humanity. Unexpectedly, the sniper expresses regret for shooting another person.
As he watches his enemy fall, he shuddered. The lust of battle died in him. He became bitten by remorse. The sweat stood out in beads on his forehead. Weakened by his wound and the long summer day of fasting and watching on the roof, he revolted from the sight of the shattered mass of his dead enemy. His teeth chattered, he began to gibber to himself, cursing the war, cursing himself, cursing everybody.
O’Flaherty reveals that the sniper is a human with feelings, not merely a cold killing machine. The sniper finally realizes the consequences of his actions and physically manifests regret, confusion, and madness. The sniper becomes a tired, half-starved, injured victim of war himself.
However, his brief moment of conscience ends when he is “frightened back to his senses by” the sound of a gunshot. No longer nervous and frightened, the sniper laughs and seems to resume his less human, more attack-ready state.
Interestingly, the sniper does not completely revert to his earlier coldness but displays ambivalence. His sudden curiosity trumps his discipline. He risks danger to see the face of his victim.
O’Flaherty uses symbols to show how war imbues everyday objects with tragic weight. The sniper uses a long rifle to execute people from a distance. The enemy on the other rooftop shoots the sniper with a rifle. Both men can maintain physical...
(This entire section contains 852 words.)
and emotional distances from their victims.
Only after the sniper uses his revolver to shoot the enemy does he feel any human connection with his victim. The revolver—shorter than a rifle—brings the sniper physically and metaphorically closer to this target; he unknowingly shoots his brother from only 50 yards away.
The sniper’s cap is an example of a synecdoche—a symbol where a part stands for the whole. The cap represents the sniper’s head and his entire body. He props the cap upon his rifle to mimic him standing up and falling. The cap becomes a tool of deception in war.
The cigarette symbolizes dangerous pleasure. It might relax him, but the sniper debates if smoking is worth the risk. By lighting up a cigarette, the sniper alerts the enemy of his presence, which leads to him being shot.
O’Flaherty tells the story through third-person limited narration person, from the sniper’s point of view. This technique effectively builds and sustains suspense as the readers see and experience what the sniper witnesses and feels. No characters in the story have a name, reinforcing the sniper’s impersonal view of his targets. The sniper himself remains unnamed, suggesting the universality of his character. Ultimately, O’Flaherty’s narrative technique leaves readers wondering how the sniper reacts to his gruesome discovery. Does he feel regret and anguish or continue to be cold as a form of self-protection?
Last Updated on April 5, 2022, by eNotes Editorial. Word Count: 909
The setting of “The Sniper” is integral to the narrative, for it draws its action from the Irish Civil War. The story takes place in Dublin, Ireland, in June 1922. At this time, the Irish Civil War has been going on for several months. The Republicans hold the Four Courts judicial building, but the Free Staters are attacking them with heavy arms.
“The Sniper” also takes place between the hours of dusk and dawn. Beginning as “twilight faded into night,” the action of the story instantly becomes more dangerous. The sniper must conduct his battle in the dark. He has only “the dim light of the moon that shone through fleecy clouds” to see by. This lack of clarity has a realistic impact in making his task—difficult even in the light of day—even more challenging. The sniper has to aim at his enemy, about fifty yards away, and get off one fatal shot with a revolver. The lack of light also has symbolic significance: it underscores the murky, ambiguous situation that a civil war poses. The civil war pits friends, neighbors, and even family members against one another. As is borne out by the story’s ending, people cannot see very clearly during such a conflict.
Point of View
The narrative takes a limited, third-person point of view. The action is entirely funneled through the protagonist. The reader sees only through his eyes, hears sounds through his ears, and processes events through his thoughts. Despite this limited point of view, readers can clearly follow the action. The sniper observes the old woman on the street below as she talks to the soldier in the turret of the armored car. “She was pointing to the roof where the sniper lay,” and the sniper—and the reader—knows that she is pinning down his location and that the soldiers may well come after him. When the sniper carries out his plan to trick the enemy sniper into thinking that he is dead, he can tell that he has been successful. For the enemy “seeing the cap and rifle fall . . . was now standing before a row of chimney pots, looking across, with his head clearly silhouetted against the western sky.” Though the story never gets deep in the mind of the enemy, the reader, like the sniper, knows that the Free Stater “thought that he had killed his man.”
This point of view works well with the emotional detachment of the narrative. Rarely does the protagonist show his reaction to the events around him, other than the excitement of the battle and his momentary repulsion at having killed another human being. Even when he learns that the man now lying in a “shattered mass” is his brother, the sniper does not react. Instead, the story ends, leaving the reader to only speculate about his feelings.
Details and Sound
O’Flaherty employs a number of specific details to make his story realistic. He describes the battle sounds taking place around the sniper, and he refers to actual events and places, such as the Four Courts siege and the nearby O’Connell Bridge. The description of the sniper’s first aid efforts is also filled with many concrete details, like the “bitter fluid” of the iodine, the “paroxysm of pain [that] swept through him,” and his need to tie the ends of the bandage with his teeth. Such details help ground the reader in the action.
O’Flaherty also uses details to emphasize the darkness. The sniper can see only by the “dim light” from the moon and, later, approaching dawn. Even the flare from lighting a cigarette is easily seen. The sniper decides to risk the cigarette, striking a match, taking a drag on the cigarette, and then putting out the light. Though this process takes only a matter of seconds, if that, “almost immediately, a bullet flattened itself against the parapet of the roof.”
Although the story is rooted in reality, O’Flaherty employs descriptive sound imagery to emphasize the stillness and dark of the night. Throughout Dublin, the machine guns and rifles “broke the silence of the night, spasmodically, like dogs barking on lone farms.” When the sniper gets shot and drops his rifle with a clatter, he “thought the noise would wake the dead.” Once his personal battle is over and he has killed all his immediate enemies—the soldier in the turret, the old woman, and the other sniper—“Everywhere around was quiet.” This technique emphasizes the danger of the situation, as well as the sniper’s complete isolation and his need to vanquish his enemies on his own.
A. A. Kelly writes in Liam O’Flaherty: The Storyteller that “The Sniper” “with its surprise ending based on coincidence is in the older tradition of Maupassant and O’Henry.” Such an ending hinges on an unexpected revelation at the end, be it lighthearted or tragic. Few writers have been able to employ the surprise ending effectively. However, O’Flaherty does so successfully because he has already engaged the reader through the fast-paced action and the unique detachment of the protagonist. The shocking ending seems likely to challenge that detachment, but O’Flaherty refuses to reveal the sniper’s reaction to the knowledge that he has murdered his brother. Instead, O’Flaherty leaves it up to the reader to draw conclusions and to wonder how, or if, this event will affect the future choices the sniper makes.
Last Updated on April 5, 2022, by eNotes Editorial. Word Count: 973
The English in Ireland
In the twelfth century, the English monarch, backed by a large army, declared himself overlord of Ireland. For the next several centuries, English rule was generally confined to the area around Dublin. The English monarchy, however, continued efforts to subdue the entire island, resulting in ongoing Irish rebellion. In the early 1600s, the monarchy overthrew the native Irish political system, bringing the entire country under its control. For the next hundred years, the English created colonies in Ireland. As part of this effort, they drove many Irish from their land and gave estates to English landowners. Religious problems arose as well, since most Irish were Roman Catholics, while the new English settlers, who mainly lived in the north, followed the Protestant faith. Laws continually favored Protestants over Catholics.
By the late 1700s, Irish rebels were making repeated efforts to gain some kind of independence. Their efforts were to little avail, and in 1801 the Act of Union formally united Great Britain and Ireland. This law abolished the Irish Parliament; instead, Ireland voted for representatives who served in the British Parliament.
Beginning in the 1870s, a Home Rule movement was on the rise among Irish nationalists, most of whom were Catholics. Supporters demanded some form of self-government. They were opposed by Irish Protestants, who were called unionists because they wanted to preserve Ireland’s status in the United Kingdom. Irish political leader Charles Parnell, who sat in the British Parliament, led a nationalist party and demanded a separate Irish Parliament. Later, in 1902, a new nationalist political party known as Sinn Féin was formed. Its goal was to secure Irish independence.
Because of these nationalist efforts, by the 1910s, the British Parliament enacted a Home Rule bill. While most of Ireland supported this bill, Protestants in Northern Ireland vowed to resist any home rule by force; they feared that the island would become dominated by the Catholics. The onset of World War I, however, delayed the enactment of home rule in Ireland.
The Easter Rising
Irish home rule supporters were frustrated by this delay. In April 1916, a rebellion known as the Easter Rising began in Dublin. About 1,000 Irish forces rose against British rule. Over the next week, street fighting sprang up throughout Dublin, and Republicans seized some government offices. British soldiers, however, forced the Republican leaders to surrender and executed some of the leaders.
In the aftermath of the Easter Rising, when the elections of 1918 took place, Irish voters backed many members of the Sinn Féin political party as their representatives in the British Parliament, over members of the more moderate Irish party. Sinn Féin advocated complete independence for Ireland, and instead of taking their seats, these Irish Republicans set up a revolutionary government and formed an Irish assembly called Dáil Éireann in Dublin.
Until 1921, a brutal war rocked Ireland. The newly created Irish Republican Army (IRA) fought against the British, resisted efforts to renew British rule, and forced Britain to recognize the Irish government. They relied on guerrilla tactics, to which the English government, represented by the police force known as the Black and Tans, responded with brutal reprisals.
During this period, the divisions between north and south grew, with northern unionists threatening to rebel if they were cast free from Britain. In response, the British government passed the Government of Ireland Act in 1920, which called for two separate parliaments for Northern Ireland and Southern Ireland. Finally, in 1922, leaders of the Dáil Éireann signed the Anglo-Irish Treaty with Britain. This treaty made twenty-six of Ireland’s thirty-two counties into the Irish Free State, a self-governing dominion within the British Commonwealth of Nations, while the six counties of Northern Ireland remained part of the United Kingdom.
Irish Civil War
Within Ireland, not everyone supported the Anglo-Irish Treaty. The British prime minister had even threatened open war on Ireland if the treaty was not accepted. Republicans particularly objected to the oath of allegiance that members of the Dáil Éireann would have to make to the British monarch, as well as the provision that allowed Northern Ireland to remain out of the Irish Free State. Eamon de Valera, head of the Dáil Éireann, would not support the treaty, and he resigned. Elections were held for the new Irish Parliament, which led to the ousting of most of the Republicans. Before the new Parliament could meet, a civil war had broken out between supporters of the treaty, known as Free Staters, and its opponents, called Republicans. In April 1922, Republican forces occupied Dublin’s justice buildings, the Four Courts. They came under siege from the Free State forces. For several days in June, the Free Staters bombarded the Four Courts. They retook the buildings and captured the enemy leader. Before their capture, however, the Republicans blew up the Four Courts. Despite this Free State victory, battles continued to take place in Dublin until early July, when Free States forces gained control of the city.
Fighting continued outside of Dublin, and the Irish government (still controlled by Free Staters) initiated official military operations. The government took strong measures to quell the civil war, including executing Republican leaders. Within a few months as well, the Dáil Éireann met to draft and ratify a new constitution for Ireland.
The Irish Free State
The Republican resistance became less organized. By early 1923, Republican forces had ceased fighting. De Valera, the Republican leader, ordered a cease-fire. A few years later, he reentered the Irish political scene. He formed a new political party and served several times as Ireland’s prime minister. In 1937, De Valera drafted a new constitution that made Ireland into a new state, called Éire, which was a republic in all but name. In 1948, Ireland finally gained complete independence. The six counties of Northern Ireland, however, remained part of the United Kingdom.
Last Updated on April 5, 2022, by eNotes Editorial. Word Count: 262
1920s: Ireland is part of the United Kingdom. Many Irish have long been unhappy with this situation. In the late 1910s, Irish forces rebel and begin fighting with British forces. They seek independence from British rule.
Today: Four-fifths of the island of Ireland makes up the independent Republic of Ireland, or Eire in the Irish language. Northern Ireland makes up the rest of the island, and it is part of the United Kingdom.
1920s: Republicans and Free Staters engage in a deadly and destructive civil war. Republicans refuse to accept the Anglo-Irish Treaty, which makes southern Ireland a dominion within the United Kingdom, known as the Irish Free State. The Republicans want all of the island of Ireland to have independence. Free Staters, however, support this treaty. The civil war carries on from 1921 until 1923, when a cease-fire is declared, with the Free Staters victorious.
Today: After decades of fighting between Protestants in Northern Ireland and the Irish Republican Army—the paramilitary arm of Sinn Féin—the two sides agree to a cease-fire in 1998. Troubles, however, still brew in Ireland over the division of the island. In 2004, Protestant and Catholic political parties struggle over ways to share power, and allegations of kidnapping and violence on the part of the IRA still take place.
1920s: Irish political leaders are all men, such as Michael Collins, Eamon de Valera, and Arthur Griffith.
Today: Women take a much more active role in politics. In 1990, Mary Robinson becomes the first woman to serve as president of the Republic, and women serve as leaders of political parties.
Last Updated on April 5, 2022, by eNotes Editorial. Word Count: 290
Calahan, James M., “Politics,” in Liam O’Flaherty, A Study of the Short Fiction, Twayne Publishers, 1991, pp. 30–40.
Doyle, Paul A., “Liam O’Flaherty,” in Dictionary of Literary Biography, Vol. 162, British Short Fiction Writers, 1915–1945, edited by John H. Rogers, Gale Research, 1996, pp. 282–92.
Kelly, A. A., “Urban and War Themes,” in Liam O’Flaherty: The Storytellers, Harper & Row Publishers, 1976, pp. 23–36.
O’Brien, James H., “The Short Stories,” in Liam O’Flaherty, Associated University Presses, 1973, pp. 92–117.
Troy, William, “The Position of Liam O’Flaherty,” in Bookman, Vol. LXIX, March 29, 1929, pp. 7–11.
Bates, H. E., “The Irish School” in The Modern Short Story: A Critical Survey, The Writer, 1972, pp. 148–62. Bates, himself a writer of numerous novels and short stories, places O’Flaherty’s work within the context of other important twentieth-century Irish writers.
Brewer, Paul, ed., Ireland: History, Culture, People, Courage Books, 2002. This volume provides an illustrated introduction to Ireland, focusing on its history through the early 2000s, its people, and its culture.
Doyle, Paul A., Liam O’Flaherty, Twayne Publishers, 1971. Doyle’s work provides a good overview of O’Flaherty’s entire body of fiction, both short stories and novels, as well as a detailed biographical chapter.
Kiely, Benedict, Modern Irish Fiction: A Critique, Golden Eagle Books, 1950. Kiely discusses the preeminent Irish writers of the first half of the twentieth century and dubs O’Flaherty a romantic.
Ranelagh, John O’Beirne, A Short History of Ireland, Cambridge University Press, 1995. This updated edition covers Irish history from ancient times through the end of the twentieth century.
Zneimer, John, The Literary Vision of Liam O’Flaherty, Syracuse University Press, 1970. Zneimer’s detailed work investigates O’Flaherty’s personal life, the themes of his work, and specifically analyzes his body of short fiction.