The voice of my education said to meHe must be killed...
Unlock
This Answer NowStart your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
This description of the poet's conduct as paltry, vulgar, and mean is in direct contrast with the stateliness and grandeur of the snake. It is here that he is described as a king:I thought how paltry, how vulgar, what a mean act!I despised myself and the voices of my accursed human education.
The snake is described as a king, then as a lord, to provide contrast with the poet's pettiness and vulgarity. Lawrence's descriptions are an inversion of the way people normally see such matters. The snake is usually portrayed in art and literature as the abject creature, crawling on its belly. It is the man who is the lord of life, the earthly king created in the image of God. Lawrence sees the opposite of this in the snake's natural grace and his own capitulation to the destructive norms of human civilization.For he seemed to me again like a king,Like a king in exile, uncrowned in the underworld,Now due to be crowned again.And so, I missed my chance with one of the lordsOf life.And I have something to expiate:A pettiness.