Themes: Colonialism
"Shooting an Elephant" by George Orwell explores the theme of colonialism, highlighting its dehumanizing effects on both the colonizers and the colonized. The narrative illustrates the moral conflict faced by Orwell, a British officer in Burma, who is pressured into shooting an elephant to maintain authority, despite his personal reluctance. This act symbolizes the oppressive nature of imperialism, which forces individuals to conform to societal expectations at the expense of personal ethics. Orwell's narrative exposes the guilt and resentment that imperialism breeds, highlighting its destructive impact on all involved.
The elephant's death is depicted in vivid detail, symbolizing the tragic consequences of colonial rule. Orwell describes the elephant's transformation from a majestic creature to a suffering victim, paralleling the decline of British colonialism. The elephant's agony and slow death reflect the moral decay and brutality inherent in the colonial system. Orwell's internal conflict is evident as he narrates the elephant's demise, torn between his duties as a colonial officer and his empathy for the animal.
I fired a third time. That was the shot that did for him. You could see the agony of it jolt his whole body and knock the last remnant of strength from his legs. But in falling he seemed for a moment to rise, for as his hind legs collapsed beneath him he seemed to tower upward like a huge rock toppling, his trunk reaching skyward like a tree. He trumpeted, for the first and only time. And then down he came, his belly toward me, with a crash that seemed to shake the ground even where I lay.
Orwell's decision to shoot the elephant is driven by the expectations of the local Burmese people and his role as a colonial officer. Despite his personal opposition, he is compelled to act to avoid appearing weak. This highlights the paradox of colonial rule, where the colonizer loses personal freedom by assuming the role of a tyrant. Orwell realizes he is a "puppet" of imperialism, forced to prioritize the appearance and success of colonial rule over his own ethical beliefs.
They were watching me as they would watch a conjurer about to perform a trick. They did not like me, but with the magical rifle in my hands I was momentarily worth watching. And suddenly I realised that I should have to shoot the elephant after all. The people expected it of me and I had got to do it; I could feel their two thousand wills pressing me forward, irresistibly.
The local Burmese people's treatment of Orwell reflects the complex dynamics of colonialism. They despise him as a representative of the oppressive British rule, yet they expect him to maintain order. This duality underscores the dehumanizing effects of imperialism, as both the colonizers and the colonized are trapped in a system that breeds resentment and hostility. Orwell's narrative reveals his own hatred for the colonial system and the role he plays within it, highlighting the moral and ethical dilemmas faced by individuals caught in the machinery of empire.
Expert Q&A
Interpreting George Orwell's character and potential racism in "Shooting an Elephant"
In "Shooting an Elephant," Orwell's character exhibits both cowardice and racism. He shoots the elephant to avoid looking foolish, despite recognizing the brutality of imperialism and his own conflicted feelings towards the Burmese. While he criticizes British colonial rule, he still views the Burmese monolithically and feels superior to them, demonstrating that imperialism corrupts both the oppressors and the oppressed.
Conflicts in "Shooting an Elephant"
In "Shooting an Elephant," George Orwell explores several conflicts. The primary conflict is the narrator's moral dilemma over shooting a peaceful elephant to maintain colonial authority. This act symbolizes the broader cultural conflict between the British colonizers and the Burmese, highlighting the oppressive nature of imperialism. Orwell's internal conflict stems from his hatred of his role as a colonial officer, feeling torn between his disdain for British oppression and his resentment towards the Burmese. This mutual animosity exacerbates his internal struggle, illustrating the destructive impact of colonialism on both oppressors and the oppressed.
Get Ahead with eNotes
Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.
Already a member? Log in here.