Places Discussed
*London
*London. Center of the British Empire and home to exiled revolutionaries and refugees from throughout Europe. During the time of the novel, the great latitude and freedom extended by the British government to these exiles was a perpetual source of irritation and concern for more repressive governments on the continent of Europe, especially the unnamed country represented by Mr. Vladimir.
Verloc’s shop
Verloc’s shop. Shabby establishment at 32 Brett Street in the Soho section of London. As a cover to his activities as a secret agent for a foreign government (probably Russian), Adolf Verloc operates a small shop where he sells stationery, inks, and questionable publications, most of them of a vaguely revolutionary or quasi-pornographic nature. During business hours, the shop’s door is left open and the coming and going of customers is signaled by a small, loud bell. Faded magazines, obscure newspapers, a few shabby bottles of ink, and other writing materials are displayed in the glass front of the shop and ranged along the shelves behind the counter. During much of the time, Verloc sits on a stool at the counter, hardly moving.
Verloc’s home
Verloc’s home. Behind the shop live Verloc and his wife, Winnie, along with Winnie’s aged mother and mentally deficient brother, Stevie. The home is furnished with what furniture remains with Winnie’s mother from earlier, more prosperous days of her own marriage. Together, the shop and home present a thoroughly unremarkable appearance; the business is adequate but hardly prosperous. In a similar fashion, Verloc’s secret life is only marginally successful. The parlor of the Verloc home is the meeting place of anarchists, socialists, and revolutionaries from throughout Europe, but these conspirators are merely ineffectual talkers, incapable of true action. Verloc’s establishment is an appropriate physical setting for his secret but sordid activities.
Assistant commissioner’s office
Assistant commissioner’s office. Office in the headquarters of the London police charged with investigating crimes such as Verloc’s and the site of a lengthy discussion between the assistant commissioner and the chief inspector on the Verloc case. The assistant commissioner’s office, barely described by Conrad, is a lean, functional place, much like the assistant commissioner himself. Its function defines its appearance: It is a place where solid, honest work is performed.
London embassy
London embassy. Typical diplomatic establishment of an unnamed European government. From the hints given by the narrative, the unnamed government is most probably the Russian Empire, although it might possibly be the Austrian-Hungarian Empire, both of which were highly fearful of international revolutionaries and employed secret agents such as Verloc against them. It is in these highly polished surroundings that Mr. Vladimir gives Verloc his instructions that lead to the bombing incident at the Greenwich Observatory.
Sir Ethelred’s chambers
Sir Ethelred’s chambers. Official chambers located near the Houses of Parliament in London. As the office of the secretary of state, a high-ranking ministry in the British government, Sir Ethelred’s dignified, solemn chambers represent the stability and solidity of Britain and its society. When the assistant commissioner reports to Sir Ethelred about the progress of the Verloc case, he does so in this setting.
Drawing room of a “great lady.”
Drawing room of a “great lady.” Highly decorated site of social events which draw together characters from all ranks of society, including the assistant commissioner, revolutionary friends of Verloc, and foreign diplomats such as Mr. Vladimir. In a sense, the drawing room is a microcosm of London society.
Literary Techniques
Unlike some of Conrad's other novels and stories, such as Lord Jim (1900;...
(This entire section contains 131 words.)
Unlock this Study Guide Now
Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
see separate entry), there is no dominating first-person narrator inThe Secret Agent comparable to Charles Marlow. Moreover, the reader is not given a series of different narrative perspectives as in Lord Jim, or, as in Nostromo (1904; see separate entry). Conrad employs an apparently straightforward narrative technique in the tradition of conventional realism, a narrative method that appears deceptively simple.
Yet Conrad's narrative voice is controlled by a rigorous and masterful sense of irony. Conrad's selective use of incident tends to undercut the melodramatic and sensationalist nature of some of the story's events—a major bombing, a murder, a suicide. One result of Conrad's narrative method and tone is to deny glamour and dignity to nearly all his characters.
Literary Precedents
One of the major influences on Conrad's political fiction has generally been considered to be Dostoevsky's novels, especially The Possessed (also published as The Devils, 1 872; see separate entry) with its satirical treatment of Russian radicals. Whereas Dostoevsky, however, tended to view anarchists and revolutionaries as virtually demonic in their nature and behavior, this Conrad novel treats them as less dangerous and somewhat more ineffectual and self-destructive than Dostoevsky's radicals. Martin Seymour- Smith also concludes in his 1984 "Introduction" to the Penguin edition of the novel that Conrad's reading of the writings of revolutionaries and anarchists, especially Ivan Bakunin—as well as newspaper accounts of the 1886 attempt to blow up the Greenwich Observatory —-was a strong influence.
Other literary influences on Conrad were nearer at hand. Frederick Karl was one of the first to note, in A Reader's Guide to Joseph Conrad (1960), that Conrad's London owes much to the dingy gaslit and impoverished neighborhoods of London of Charles Dickens's later novels, especially Little Dorrit (1857) and Our Mutual Friend (1865). Conrad had in fact been an avid reader of Dickens's novels in his years at sea. Another influence that has been cited is that of Zola and other naturalistic fiction writers, particularly in regard to Conrad's depiction of urban squalor. However, yet another precedent for Conrad may have been somewhat closer to Conrad's own literary world, namely Henry James's major novel The Princess Cassamassima (1886), which also deals with London's twilight world of revolutionaries and radicals. Conrad admired much of James's fiction, corresponded with James, and made a gift of one his novels to the masterful American realist.
In his treatment of the frustrating circumstances of Mrs. Verloc's life, Conrad was probably influenced by the classics of nineteenth-century realism, particularly Flaubert's Madam Bovary, a classic study of a frustrated wife imaginatively smothered by a sterile environment and a marriage to an unimaginative mediocrity. However, it is less likely that Conrad was influenced by the fiction of George Eliot (Mary Ann Evans), whose Middlemarch (1872) is a classic treatment of the theme of an intellectually frustrated wife in an unrewarding marriage. As a matter of fact, Conrad may not have had a very extensive knowledge of Eliot's work.
At any rate, Zdzislaw Najder in Joseph Conrad: A Chronicle (1983) repeatedly stresses his contention that Flaubert was one of the major literary influences on Conrad's work. At any rate, Conrad had a fairly good knowledge of French, even writing letters in that language, and was clearly capable of reading Flaubert and his disciples (such as de Maupassant) without translations.
Adaptations
Conrad himself produced a stage version of The Secret Agent in 1919-1920, hoping perhaps to gain some new revenue from an old novel. Unfortunately, Conrad's creative powers were now in decline, and his experience of writing for the theater was very limited. Nevertheless, the play was accepted for performance and presented in November 1922. Although Conrad followed rehearsals closely and was fairly pleased with the performance, the work was strongly rejected by the newspaper reviewers and treated with indifference by the public. Although at first Conrad professed indifference about the play, he was very disappointed by the outcome of its staging, and he eventually began to blame the reviewers rather than the director and the actors.
Since he turned to stage adaptations of his work late in his career, Conrad's work as a dramatist was not distinguished by commercial success or praise from critics. But motion picture adaptations of The Secret Agent have shown that this novel (like some other Conrad works) contains elements of effective drama.
Alfred Hitchcock's 1936 film Sabotage starring Sylvia Sidney, Oscar Homolka, John Loder, and Desmond Tester, brilliantly captures the sinister and ambiguous atmosphere of Conrad's tattered and seedy underground London in black and white and various shades of gray. Focusing on the entrapment of Mrs. Verloc, Hitchcock's film explores on of his favorite themes, the plight of an innocent person struggling to extricate herself from a situation inspiring paranoia which he or she does not understand. This film is considered by some as one of the masterpieces of Hitchcock's "British period."
Readers may find it confusing that another celebrated Hitchcock film of 1936 was given the title of The Secret Agent. However, this suspense movie, starring John Gielgud, Madeline Carroll, and Peter Lorre, is a more conventional spy story based on W. Somerset Maugham's novel Ashenden Or. The British Agent.
A fine 1996 film adaptation starred Bob Hoskins, Patricia Arquette, and Gerard Depardieu. This was a reasonably faithful adaptation, with excellent performances by Hoskins as Verloc and Depardieu as Ossipon. The lovely Arquette offers a surprisingly strong and credible interpretation of Winnie Verloc. It should be noted, however, that the youthful Patricia Arquette is perhaps more glamorous than the Winnie Conrad envisioned. Written and directed with great care by Christopher Hampton, this film produces some haunting images, particularly the opening sequence showing the Professor in his slow intense, obsessive walk, and a closing sequence reworking the same image.