(Critical Survey of Literature for Students)

Matthew Arnold’s “The Scholar-Gipsy,” the major British Victorian poet’s central poem, anticipates the crisis of the modernist period. The poem is testament to Arnold’s preoccupation as a poet and a cultural critic: “this strange disease of modern life.” Arnold returns to this theme throughout his work, including in his poetic masterpieces Thyrsis (1866) and “Dover Beach” (1867) and in his major work of prose criticism, Culture and Anarchy (1869). “The Scholar-Gipsy” serves as a template for Arnold’s poetic and intellectual career and epitomizes his paradoxical combination of Victorian vigor and social progressivism with a protomodernist sense of dissociation arising from religious doubt, social fragmentation, and ennui.

Written in a ten-line stanzaic pattern for a total of 250 lines, the poem is a major English pastoral elegy in the tradition of John Milton’s “Lycidas” (1637) and Thomas Gray’s “Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard” (1751). It bears the imprint of Arnold’s classicism, with allusions to Vergil’s Aeneid (c. 29-19 b.c.e.; English translation, 1553) and its masterful conclusion in the form of an epic simile. At the same time, however, Arnold seems to undermine the sense of tradition, poetic or cultural, that he is seeking to maintain. The traditional pastoral elegy seeks to reaffirm a continuity between past and present and between the person who has died and the still-existing values that he or she had embodied.

The subject of Arnold’s elegy is a legendary, poor Oxford University student of the seventeenth century who has abandoned his studies to learn the occult ways of the nomadic Roma, or gypsy, people. The Scholar-Gipsy is portrayed not as dead but as existing in an immortal twilight of the Romantic imagination. Moreover, rather than reinforce a sense of cultural continuity, Arnold is at pains to warn his elegiac “subject” away from deadening contact with the modern world, which is portrayed as radically alien in form and values from those he inhabits.

Arnold’s unusual pastoral elegy begins well within the expectations of the genre. The poem’s speaker addresses an unnamed shepherd and describes the timeless pastoral duties involved in the care and feeding of his flock. However, even the first stanza suggests something is amiss, as the speaker pictures the sheep at night on a “moon-blanched green” and then urges the symbolic shepherd to “again begin the quest.” The moon becomes a symbol for the power of the imagination, and “quest” seems like a strong word for a simple shepherd’s job of rounding up sheep. The speaker interjects himself into the poem in the second stanza, portraying himself seated in a field high in the Cumnor Hills overlooking...

(The entire section is 1150 words.)

The Scholar-Gipsy Bibliography

(Critical Survey of Literature for Students)

Farell, John Philip. “’The Scholar-Gipsy’ and the Continuous Life of Victorian Poetry.” Victorian Poetry 43, no. 3 (Fall, 2005): 277-296. Argues that “The Scholar-Gipsy” is not a sign of Arnold’s despair over the continuation of the English poetic tradition but an ultimately positive link in its “continuous” history.

Grob, Alan. A Longing Like Despair: Arnold’s Poetry of Pessimism. Dover: University of Delaware Press, 2002. Grob finds the influence of German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer on Arnold. Arnold’s poetry, such as “The Scholar-Gipsy,” illustrates Schopenhauer’s dichotomy of the artist engaged in the paradoxical activity of trying to escape the experience of suffering while creating art about it.

Hamilton, Ian. A Gift Imprisoned: The Poetic Life of Matthew Arnold. New York: Basic Books, 1999. Hamilton, a poet and author of a definitive biography of poet Robert Lowell, examines Arnold’s life as a deliberate renunciation of his poetic gift to focus on broad social causes. “The Scholar-Gipsy” epitomizes the tragic division in Arnold’s life between timeless poet and prosaic man of his time.

Machann, Clinton. Matthew Arnold: A Literary Life. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1998. A succinct and well-articulated exposition of Arnold’s intellectual and literary concerns, spanning his career in chronological chapters.

Mazzeno, Laurence W. Matthew Arnold: The Critical Legacy. Rochester, N.Y.: Camden House, 1999. Mazzeno surveys the critical response to Arnold. Resembles an annotated bibliography in that it treats its material item by item. A good resource for students new to Arnold and his work.

Moldstad, David. “The Imagination in The Vanity of Dogmatizing and ’The Scholar-Gipsy’: Arnold’s Reversal of Glanvill.” Victorian Poetry 25, no. 2 (Summer, 1987): 159-172. Moldstad argues that Arnold did not merely use Joseph Glanvill’s legend of the scholar-gypsy as a starting point for his own poem. Rather, Arnold reverses Glanvill’s seventeenth century distrust of the imagination to a positive identification with the creative faculty capable of transcending the limitations of rationality.

Trotter, David. “Hidden Ground Within: Matthew Arnold’s Lyric and Elegiac Poetry.” English Literary History 44, no. 3 (Autumn, 1977): 526-553. Examines Arnold’s development of the Romantic conceit of the gypsy (Roma) as social outsider. Trotter argues that “The Scholar-Gipsy,” and Arnold’s other early poetry, acts as a “hidden ground” or a personal zone exempt from Victorian materialism and positivism.

The Scholar-Gipsy Summary

(Masterpieces of World Literature, Critical Edition)

For the central premise of “The Scholar-Gipsy,” Arnold draws upon a legend of the area surrounding the university city of Oxford. The legend tells of a wandering scholar who rejects the material world of the academy to pursue a vague and idealistic objective. Arnold uses this story as a metaphor for his indictment of a world that is obsessed with materialism and individual advancement but is largely indifferent to culture and the pursuit of the ideal. In 1844, Arnold had purchased a copy of Joseph Glanvill’s The Vanity of Dogmatizing (1661). Glanvill’s book recounts the tale of an Oxford student who, with neither patron nor independent financial means, was forced to discontinue his studies and to make his way in the world. Increasing poverty leads him to join a band of roving gypsies, with whom he begins a new and very different education. From these vagabonds, who roam at will following rules and traditions that in no way answer to the world of “preferment,” he discovers the power of the imagination stimulated by nature. Gradually he rejects the world of humanity and materialism. As the years become centuries, the increasingly mysterious scholar-gipsy continues his quest, a solitary figure always seen at a distance, carefully avoiding any contact with the corruption of modern civilization.

“The Scholar-Gipsy,” with its bucolic setting, has many of the characteristics of the traditional pastoral elegy. These characteristics are clearly apparent in the first stanza. As, for example, John Milton does in “Lycidas” (1638), Arnold addresses the young poet, casting him in the role of the shepherd who has abandoned the “quest,” the pursuit of the ideal, to go forth into the world of political change and turmoil. In 1848, Arnold’s close friend, the poet Arthur Hugh Clough, left his post at Oxford in order to become more directly involved in the revolutionary social changes that were then restructuring all of European society. In the first stanza, the speaker calls upon the poet-shepherd to return, when the turmoil has settled, from leading the “sheep” of restless England. Return, he importunes the shepherd-poet, when “the fields are still,/ And the tired men and dogs all gone to rest.” The speaker (Arnold) and his fellow poet will remain behind, in the natural setting, away from the din of the city. The third stanza is almost purely descriptive. It presents the speaker reclining amid the beauties of nature, which Arnold renders with true Keatsian sensuosity.

In the fourth through the seventh stanzas, Arnold relates the legend of the scholar-gipsy, drawn from “Glanvill’s book.” The secrets of the “gipsy-crew,” the ultimate truth to be drawn from nature, remain elusive, the wandering scholar tells some former fellow...

(The entire section is 1137 words.)