The getting of justice is the alleged business of a trial. But in most of Grisham's novels, "justice" is relative. Whatever readers may think of tobacco companies, in this novel they are corrupting entities whom justice demands be brought down. But bringing them down seems impossible unless their adversary uses corrupt means. Marlee and Nicholas decide that Fitch and his employers violate absolute moral standards. But then do these do-gooders violate moral standards by their manipulation of the jury? The novel broaches the issues of ends and means, of moral relativism.
While pretending to negotiate with Fitch to fix the verdict, Marlee brags, "It'll work because all the players are corrupt. You're corrupt. Your clients are corrupt. My partner and I are corrupt. Corrupt but smart. We pollute the system in such a way that we cannot be detected." While functioning as a part of her act to hoodwink Fitch, the statement has more than a kernel of truth. She and her partner have lied repeatedly and toyed with the unsuspecting members of the jury. But causing the dismissals of jurors who do not share their sentiments or who cannot be convinced, Nicholas and Marlee pollute the system. Is the verdict then fair? Well, the bad guys did lose. But what about the merits of the case, on either side? Sadly, the merits never mattered. In the novel's last scene, Marlee justifies herself to Fitch by claiming, "I lied and cheated because that's what your client understands."...
(The entire section is 541 words.)