Discussion Topic
Realizing and responding to the ending of "A Rose for Emily."
Summary:
The ending of "A Rose for Emily" reveals the macabre truth that Emily Grierson has been sleeping next to the corpse of her former lover, Homer Barron, whom she poisoned. This shocking discovery highlights themes of isolation, obsession, and the grip of the past on the present.
When did you realize the ending of "A Rose for Emily"? What was your response?
After learning about the terrible smell that pervades Emily's home, I became suspicious, but I really began to suspect that Emily would poison someone after she purchases the rat poison from the druggist, reluctant to say what her plans for the poison are. If she was purchasing the poison for some normal, legal reason, then she wouldn't have so much trouble saying what it was for.
While the end certainly horrified me out at first (the idea of seeing, let alone sleeping next to, a decayed and rotting body is terrible), I have come to recognize Emily's strange behavior as the desperate actions of a desperate woman. When her father died, leaving her utterly alone, he had already chased away all her suitors, because he believed that they were not good enough for her. She held on to her father's body for several days, well past the point of it remaining fresh, and it seemed as though the prospect of being finally alone was so frightening for her that she would rather have kept her father's decomposing body than admit to herself that she was all by herself now. Rather than allow Homer Barron to leave her, it seems, she killed him. In this way, she can keep him forever and never have to face the solitude that seems so frightening to her.
Obviously the answer to when an individual reader figures out that Emily has murdered Homer Barron years ago will vary greatly. Having taught this story for several years to high school students, I can attest to the fact that most students don't figure it out until the very end, and many students are still confused about what happened even when they have finished the story. The jumbled timeline is one way that Faulkner keeps his readers off balance, making it less likely that they will guess what Emily did in her thirties. Most people have a good idea that when Emily is buying rat poison, she wants to murder someone with it because she asks for the strongest poison the druggist has and refuses to say what she wants it for. But since the issue of the horrible smell around Emily's house is reported in section II of the story and Homer Barron's disappearance is described in section IV, many readers have a hard time reconstructing the timeline while they are reading the story to make the smell come shortly after Barron's disappearance. In addition, the fact that Emily ordered what seemed to be wedding gifts for Barron seems inconsistent with her wanting to poison him. Not only that, but Miss Emily's family servant who stays with her until her death seems a mute testimony that nothing too horrific can have gone on under her roof, to say nothing of her opening up her home for china-painting lessons. Therefore, most readers can be forgiven for being completely in the dark until the third paragraph from the end.
Regarding the ending, especially the suggestion of necrophilia, most people are, to put it in student language, "grossed out" by it. Readers tend to be first disgusted, then surprised, and then confused. Only when they take time to look back over the story do they come to appreciate Faulkner's skill in weaving this unusual and creepy story.
When did you first realize the ending of "A Rose for Emily" and what was your response?
I was surprised by the ending. Leading up to the conclusion of the story, we have every reason to believe that Emily is staunchly proud to the point of being divorced from reality. We have no reason, however, to suppose that she is so divorced from a common sense of morality.
Though the poison is discussed at some length, I did not read that detail as a clue to the ultimate revelation of the story.
I agree with the others who weren't particularly surprised by the murder (given the many clues) but were by the mouldering corpse in the upstairs bedroom. I think it's a combination of shock and surprise and awe which I felt the first time I read this story. Kind of the same horrified fascination we all have at a gruesome accident.
I have a haerd time anbswering this honestly as I have read and taught the story so many times, but I don;t recall having been surprised by the discovery of Homer's corpse yet, at the same time, I know that I did not predict it. There was enough foreshadowing in the work (the smell emanating from the house being the key) that I was relatively certain there was a dead body in there at some time, but I wasn't prepared for it to be in her bed.
At first, it was a moment of instant revulsion. Then, I became curious. Why had she done it? I understood her need to keep him and the pressures the town placed her under, so I felt sorry for her.
I agree with the above responses. When I first read the story, I figured that Emily had killed Homer after the strange smell was detected coming from her house. I linked this to the info about what happened to her father when he died. However, I did not think that she would have been sleeping with the dead body; in saying that, I was not surprised. Emily was so isolated and lonely over the years that her wanting to hold on to Homer Barron was at least understandable even though not justifiable.
The first time I read the story, I did not expect that Miss Emily had been sleeping with the corpse of Homer Baron, but I did know earlier in the story that she probably had murdered him. The clues about her purchace of the arsenic and her unwillingness to explain what it was for, plus the unbearable odor were pretty good clues that something much bigger than a rat (or maybe Homer was a rat)had died.
I believe one would have to be highly psychic to have figured out the double surprise ending of William Faulkner's Southern gothic short story, "A Rose for Emily." The surprise ending(s) is one of the highlights of the story, and it probably ranks among the greatest of all short story endings. It has been more than 30 years since I first read this story, but as I recall, I had the use of the rat poison and the source of "the smell" figured out. However, I never expected to see Homer turn up in Emily's bed, nor did I see the final twist coming: the strand of gray hair that indicated Emily had been sharing the bed with Homer for all those years. I have taught this story in many different grades (and recently had it taught to me in a college English class), and the response by most students is similar: many opened jaws in surprise; many "Ewww, gross" remarks; and always a few students who can't comprehend the ending without an explanation.
I think I must be a little bit slow because I really did not see that ending coming until it happened. Maybe I thought Homer was dead and in the house, but I don't think I would have bet on it. But I really didn't think that she would leave him to rot in the bed. And I certainly didn't think she would sleep in that bed!
I have two responses to the ending. First is "that's absolutely disgusting." Second is "poor Miss Emily." She must have been so lonely and unhappy with her life to do that. It is really unimaginable.
Get Ahead with eNotes
Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.
Already a member? Log in here.