The South after the Civil War
The Reconstruction after the Civil War had a profound and humbling effect on Southern society. The South’s outdated plantation economy, based so long upon slave labor, was devastated by emancipation. Northern opportunists, known as ‘‘carpet-baggers,’’ came in droves to take advantage of the economic chaos. Some Southern aristocrats found themselves working the land alongside tenant farmers and former slaves. Faulkner came from a family that once owned a plantation. The history of his family and of the South in general inspired Faulkner’s imagination.
The short stories and novels Faulkner wrote about Yoknapatawpha County combine to create an epic, mythical history of this era. David Minter, in his biography William Faulkner: His Life and Work, notes that as a teenager, Faulkner was known for being observational to the point of oddness: ‘‘Sometimes he joined the old men of Oxford on the town square . . . there he sat or stood motionless, quiet, as though held fast by some inner scene or some inner sense of himself.’’ It was in this manner that Faulkner soaked up the legends of his region. He heard Civil War stories from the old veterans, hunting stories from his father, stories of his great-grandfather’s heroic exploits from his grandfather, and fables about the animals in the forest told by Mammy Caroline Barr, an ex-slave who watched over him when he was a small boy. The stories he heard, along with his experiences in Oxford during his own lifetime, greatly informed the scope of his work.
‘‘A Rose for Emily,’’ in a few pages, covers approximately three-quarters of a century. The birth of Emily Grierson took place sometime around the Civil War. Her death takes place sometime in the late 1920s or early 1930s—that is, sometime around the year Faulkner wrote the story. Because Faulkner came from a family with an aristocratic bearing and associated with other similar families, he was familiar with the arrogance of characters like the Griersons. Some of these people continued to behave as if they were still privileged plantation owners although their wealth was gone. However, Faulkner spent much of his time observing ordinary townspeople as well, and this is why he was able to capture the voice of the common people of Jefferson in the character of the narrator.
The narrator in ‘‘A Rose for Emily’’ notes a change that occurred in the character of his town when Jefferson’s Board of Aldermen attempted to collect Emily’s taxes. Originally, the town was governed by men of the old South like Colonel Sartoris and Judge Stevens. Men like this operated under a code of chivalry that was extremely protective of white women. Thus, Colonel Sartoris was unable to allow the town to tax a poor spinster, and Judge Stevens was unable to confront Emily about the smell coming from her house.
As each generation passed the torch, however, the newer generations were further and further away from the antiquated social mores of their forebears. The men who tried to collect Emily’s taxes didn’t operate under the same code of conduct as their grandfathers and great-grandfathers did. Emily was not a ‘‘damsel in distress’’ to these men; she was a nuisance, a hindrance to progress. Faulkner was very interested in this conflict between nineteenth and twentieth-century Southern society. The old Southern families of his novels, such as the Compsons in The Sound and the Fury , ultimately collapse under the weight of their histories. In ‘‘A Rose for Emily,’’ Emily Grierson was certainly a character trapped in her genteel past, although she literally had a ‘‘skeleton in...
(This entire section contains 605 words.)
See This Study Guide Now
Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this study guide. You'll also get access to more than 30,000 additional guides and more than 350,000 Homework Help questions answered by our experts.
Cite this page as follows:
"A Rose for Emily - Historical Context" Short Stories for Students Vol. 6. Gale Cengage eNotes.com 24 Feb. 2024 <https://www.enotes.com/topics/rose-emily/in-depth/historical-social-context#in-depth-historical-social-context-historical-context>
1930s: The 1929 collapse of the stock market in the U.S. leads to the Great Depression. Unemployment grows from 5 million in 1930 to 13 million in 1932 (24.9% of the population).
1990s: The U.S. economy booms. The stock market climbs to unprecedented levels, while unemployment is at a quarter-century low.
1930s: The thirties are part of a three-decade long golden age of radio. Families gather around the radio after dinner to listen to news, sports events, and dramas such as ‘‘The Shadow’’ and ‘‘Little Orphan Annie.’’
1990s: Media is pervasive in late twentieth-century life. The choices seem endless; radio, television (with hundreds of channels), film, and the Internet provide people with information and entertainment twenty-four hours a day.
1930s: Bruno Hauptmann is tried for the kidnapping and murder of the Lindbergh baby. (Charles Lindbergh was the first man to fly across the Atlantic Ocean on a solo voyage.) Although many believe that there is a rush to judgement in Hauptmann's conviction, he is executed in 1936 via the electric chair. The press dub the proceedings the ‘‘Trial of the Century.’’
1990s: Former football star O. J. Simpson is arrested for the brutal murder of his ex-wife Nicole and her friend Ron Goldman. The most incendiary topics of the time are involved: race, class, sex, gender, and fame. Simpson is acquitted (although a later jury finds him liable for the murders in a civil case). The press dub the proceedings the ‘‘Trial of the Century.’’
Cite this page as follows:
"A Rose for Emily - Compare and Contrast" Short Stories for Students Vol. 6. Gale Cengage eNotes.com 24 Feb. 2024 <https://www.enotes.com/topics/rose-emily/in-depth/historical-social-context#in-depth-historical-social-context-compare-contrast>