Discussion Topic

Character analysis of the man and the boy in The Road

Summary:

In The Road, the man is a protective and resilient father, determined to keep his son safe in a post-apocalyptic world. The boy, embodying innocence and hope, represents the possibility of goodness and humanity's future. Their relationship is central to the narrative, highlighting themes of survival, love, and moral integrity amidst desolation.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

How would you describe the man and the boy's characters in The Road?

There is an obvious difference between the man and the boy in this excellent novel as they embark together on their journey. We can usefully utilise opposites to describe them and shed light on their character. For example, we can relate the state of innocence to the boy. He, throughout the novel, wants to help the people that they come across and lacks the kind of cynicism and instinct for danger that his father possesses. The father we could relate to the state of experience. He has witnessed the kind of behaviour that has accompanied the apocalypse that has reduced the world to its present state and is incredibly suspicious of everyone and thing in his attempt to ensure the survival of his son. A classic example of these two differing states of being comes when they encounter the old man, travelling by himself. The father's automatic thought is that...

Unlock
This Answer Now

Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

he is a decoy, whereas his son just wants to help him. Note the conversation that occurs during their dinnertime:

I know what the question is, the man said. The answer is no.
What's the question?
Can we keep him. We cant.
I know.
You know.

The boy automatically believes in people and in their innate goodness, whereas the father automatically distrusts such instincts. Interestingly, at various points in the novel, the son almost seems to perform the function of reminding his father of his humanity. This, I would argue, is the crucial difference between these two characters.

Approved by eNotes Editorial