Themes: British Imperialism
Kipling is famous for supporting British imperialism in his works. During the Victorian era, imperialism was not just about colonization; it also represented an ideology and mindset of assumed British superiority. This racial bias is evident even in the children's story "Rikki-Tikki-Tavi." The narrative emphasizes that the family living in the Indian bungalow is English and implies that Rikki, the mongoose, is lucky to have been saved by white people: "every well-brought-up mongoose always hopes to be a house-mongoose . . . and Rikki-tikki’s mother . . . had carefully told Rikki what to do if ever he came across white men." The depiction of the white family's home and lifestyle, representing British influence in India, is idealized, and through the specific mention of "white men," it is portrayed as superior to native Indian cultures. Additionally, the story symbolically undermines Indian culture and its Hindu religion by linking Nag, the antagonist, with the Hindu god Brahm.
Expert Q&A
Is "Rikki-Tikki-Tavi" an imperialist text? Do the cobras symbolize India or Britain?
"Rikki-Tikki-Tavi" can be interpreted as an imperialist text, reflecting British colonial attitudes. The story suggests that British rule is superior, as shown by the mongoose's preference for being a "house mongoose." The cobras symbolize India, linked to Hinduism and representing the dangers faced by the British family. This mirrors British imperialism, where Indians were co-opted to serve colonial interests, with Rikki's role paralleling this dynamic.
Get Ahead with eNotes
Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.
Already a member? Log in here.