I suppose one way of beginning to answer this question is to focus on the emotion that there is in drama as opposed to other forms of literature. There is something about seeing characters in front of you and how they respond to tragedies that allows us to connect with drama in a way that we are not necessarily able to do with prose or poetry. Aristotle refered to this as "catharsis," which he said was a purifying of the emotions through watching drama (in his case tragedy.)
With reference to this excellent play, there is something about watching the heartbroken Maurya acknowledge the death of all of her sons thanks to the sea at the end that resonates with our sensibilities. We see her left alone, insecure and solitary, broken by grief, and yet also we see that in a sense now she is freed from...
Unlock This Answer Now
Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
the sea's dominion over her life. Note what she says:
They're all gone now, and there isn't anything more the sea can do to me... I'll have no call now to be up crying and praying when the wind breaks from the south, and you can hear the surf is in the east, and the surf is in the west, making a great stir with the two noises, and they hitting one on the other.
Paradoxically, Maurya, in her grief at the death of her final son and her discovery about the death of her other son at sea, is liberated. Her words thus speak of an immense, age-old sadness of a woman who has lost her child, but at the same time of the way in which the terror that the sea had over her is now no longer binding. The emotional intensity of such lines is what makes drama unique and distinct as we see enacted before us the experience of bereavement.