AI Fact-Check
What linguistic or rhetorical devices do the authors use in the article to convey their message?
Quick answer:
The authors employ various linguistic and rhetorical devices, including repetition, imagery, juxtaposition, and appeals to fear, logic, and emotion. They also use rhetorical questions and irony. Establishing credibility through credentials, expert quotes, and the "Times Privacy Project" enhances their authority. Anecdotes personalize the issue, and a call for regulation urges action, emphasizing the urgency of legislative change. These strategies effectively engage readers and underscore the article's message.
In the passage provided, the authors employ several linguistic and rhetorical devices to effectively convey their message about the pervasive and often unnoticed surveillance by private companies through mobile phone data. Here are some of the key devices used:
-
Repetition: The authors use repetition to emphasize the ubiquity and constancy of the surveillance. Phrases like "every minute of every day, everywhere on the planet" and "tens of millions of people" underscore the scale and pervasiveness of the data collection.
-
Imagery: Vivid imagery is used to paint a picture of the invasiveness of the data collection. Descriptions such as "your life is an open book" and "carrying spies in their pockets" help readers visualize how exposed their personal lives are to these companies.
-
Juxtaposition: The authors contrast the lack of public awareness and regulation of these data companies with the potential consequences of such surveillance. By comparing the situation to an authoritarian regime like China’s, they highlight the seriousness of the issue within a democratic context.
-
Appeal to Fear: The text uses fear as a rhetorical device by highlighting the potential abuses of such surveillance, such as the ability to track intimate details of one's life and the lack of accountability of private companies compared to the government.
-
Appeal to Logic (Logos): The authors logically argue that, despite the absence of government mandates, people have effectively consented to pervasive surveillance through the use of mobile apps. This logical progression encourages readers to critically assess their own complicity in this system.
-
Appeal to Emotion (Pathos): Emotional appeals are made by highlighting the personal nature of the data collected, such as places of worship and personal health visits, which can evoke feelings of vulnerability and invasion of privacy.
-
Rhetorical Questions: The use of rhetorical questions, such as pondering the public's reaction if the government mandated tracking devices, provokes readers to question the current situation and their own complacency.
-
Irony: There is an ironic tone in the discussion of how people have voluntarily accepted surveillance through consumer apps, contrasting with the hypothetical outrage if such surveillance were government-mandated.
These devices work together to create a compelling argument that not only informs but also engages readers to consider the implications of their digital footprints and the need for greater scrutiny and regulation of data privacy.
The generated answer is a good start and identifies several key rhetorical devices used in the NYT article. It correctly points out important devices like repetition, imagery, juxtaposition, appeals to fear, logic, and emotion, rhetorical questions, and irony. However, it could be more comprehensive.
For instance, the authors make it a point to establish credibility and authority on the topic. The authors' credentials, the "Times Privacy Project," the months of investigation, and the quoting of experts all contribute to the article's persuasive power.
The article also makes good use of anecdotes to illustrate its points. The examples of Mary Millben, the Microsoft engineer, and the various individuals tracked at the inauguration are crucial to the article's impact. These anecdotes personalize the issue and make it more relatable.
The article concludes with a direct call for regulation. This is a crucial rhetorical move for connecting to the reader. The article's call to action demands congressional regulation of the location-tracking industry, arguing that self-regulation is insufficient. Emphasizing the urgency of the situation and framing the issue as a matter of citizen rights, the authors urge lawmakers to act. This call to action is the culmination of the article's detailed investigation and implicitly suggests that public pressure is key to achieving legislative change.
Get Ahead with eNotes
Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.
Already a member? Log in here.