Reckless

by Craig Lucas

Start Free Trial

Quotes

Download PDF PDF Page Citation Cite Share Link Share

Employing satire, absurdism, and irony, Craig Lucas's Reckless explores a number of universal aspects of human experience by depicting them in the extreme. One of the most pronounced themes is identity. The story explores how identity can shift. Throughout the play, characters misrepresent themselves, using false names and fabricated personal histories. In the semi-surreal world of the play, identity is continually constructed and reconstructed.

We meet the protagonist as Rachel in scene 1. By scene 3, Rachel introduces herself as Mary Ellen Sissle and rewrites her history on the spot. Throughout the course of the play, Rachel reinvents herself time and time again and assumes multiple identities with various concocted backstories. But her reimagined identities are inconsistent. She backtracks on her autobiographical claims and does little to acknowledge or effectively explain the conflicts. For example, when Lloyd, a stranger who picks Rachel up at a gas station after her husband attempts to murder her, asks if she is married, she emphatically denies it. She even throws her wedding ring out the window without hesitation, claiming it is a costume. Within a few lines, she admits that she has children and has been married. "My husband has custody," she says, failing to call him her ex-husband, without acknowledging the contradiction.

Interwoven throughout invented identities are scraps of truth. The audience is left to wonder which aspects of Rachel are artificial. Is the ring truly a costume? Does she really have sons? The former turns out to be false and the later true. However, the audience has no way of knowing it at the time. Reality is too intermingled with misrepresentation to tell the difference.

Strikingly, characters rarely question glaring inconsistencies in each others' professed identities. We quickly learn that this is because almost everyone within the exaggerated world of the play is regularly assuming a new self. The woman living with Lloyd, Pooty, has been faking deafness and paralysis. Lloyd changed his name and left his family after drinking too much, severely injuring his son, and stealing his children’s college fund. It's not just the protagonist who is prone to the fantastical. Lloyd and Rachel are living invented lives in tandem. So they skirt around the issue of truly knowing someone, unaware that the other has changed their identity as well.

Rachel: Do you think we ever really know people? I mean, I know we know people . . .

Lloyd: You mean really.

Rachel: But really.

Lloyd: But know them.

Rachel: Do you think?

Lloyd: Well . . . I don't know.

Rachel: I don't know either. I mean, I suppose I know lots of people.

Lloyd: Sure you do.

In this passage from scene 3, both Rachel and Lloyd seem to be trying to figure out if the other person suspects that they are being misled. But they also seem to be trying to figure out if they themselves are even knowable now that they have assumed a new persona. The interaction speaks to the broader theme of identity: Who am I? Who are you? Can we ever truly know one another?

Lloyd continues to wrestle with the question. He feels the need to justify the adoption of his new identity once he suspects Rachel has heard about it. He appears to feel guilty about what he has done to his family—abandoning them, injuring his son, and taking his children's college fund before reinventing himself. But Rachel doesn't see the problem. She seems to have abandoned her conflicted feelings entirely. After Lloyd confesses in scene 10, they have the following exchange:

Rachel: Well, these things happen for a reason....

(This entire section contains 955 words.)

Unlock this Study Guide Now

Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

I believe that, I'm sorry, I do. And you're not helping anybody by punishing yourself. Why don't you pay back the money and say you're sorry?

Lloyd: It was thirty-five thousand dollars.

Rachel: So? Big deal. People win that on game shows.

Her attitude seems far more cavalier and less contemplative than when they first met. She doesn't comment on the morality of Lloyd having harmed his family. Her concerns seem purely pragmatic. Lloyd, however, is not able to maintain the same level of emotional detachment from his past.

In scene 10, Lloyd is deteriorating and near death. He revisits the conversation about identity and really knowing other people. He has been withdrawn and pensive ever since his partner Pooty was murdered. But Rachel, who goes on to assume many more identities, no longer seems to wonder or care about the fundamental question of whether one can truly be known. She doesn't even acknowledge Lloyd's question, choosing to talk about food instead.

Lloyd: Here's a question.

Rachel: No.

Lloyd: Do you remember asking me if we ever really know anybody?

Rachel: Not until you eat something.

Lloyd: You remember that?

Rachel: (Unpacking groceries.) Do you hear me?

Lloyd: You asked me if I thought we ever really know anybody.

Rachel: You are going to eat something if it kills me.

Lloyd: And I’ve thought about it . . . And I would have to say . . .

Rachel: You don't have to taste it.

Lloyd: My considered opinion would be . . .

Rachel: Just smell it.

Lloyd: No. No way.

Rachel: Croissants, Lloyd!

Rachel and Lloyd started out with what appeared to be parity in their reckless use of assumed identity. But the recklessness wears on Lloyd far before it catches up to Rachel. By scene 11, she has changed her name yet again, this time to Cheryl. Lloyd is not as resilient. Unable to reconcile what he has done, reinvent his identity, and start over yet again like Rachel does, he dies in a hotel room. After several more identity changes, Rachel ultimately goes on to become a doctor and reconnects with her son. The play ends with suggestion that this reconciliation might lead her back to her original self.

Previous

Critical Essays

Loading...