Real Life vs. Art
The title of The Real Thing and its themes clearly underscore Stoppard's unique focus in this play: he often explores a moral dilemma (adultery) while probing its philosophical counterpart, the nature of genuine love. As Richard Corliss noted in a review in Time, "The Real Thing presents itself as exactly that: a genuine, straightforward play about matters of the heart." These are the central themes of The Real Thing, but Stoppard's examination is broad enough to encompass other subjects, such as the nature of reality and perception.
The play’s title mainly alludes to the characters’ pursuit of "real love." Although Henry is often sarcastic and ironic, he is essentially an idealist and a romantic. When he says "I do," he genuinely means it. However, he overlooks the uncertainties and insecurities in his partner's heart, failing to provide the assurance they need. To Henry, such gestures and words seem unnecessary; he regards the desire for them as illogical and perplexing. To him, real love exists without requiring any adornment.
Henry undergoes a journey of understanding in love when he realizes that the fictions created by the imagination, though untrue, significantly influence the actual experience of love—and infidelity. Love might involve "knowing and being known," but that understanding depends on curbing the imagination’s potentially crippling tendencies toward speculation, doubt, and suspicion. As Jack Kroll pointed out in Newsweek: "For Stoppard, the most human urgency is the need to know, and the highest comedy arises from the collapse of this process in an epic confusion."
Adding to the central examination of Henry's evolving understanding of love is Stoppard's exploration of the nature of reality itself. He unsettles the audience’s perceptions of what is real and fictional in the opening scenes of the play: "real life" and its representations blur in the contrast between House of Cards, the play-within-a-play, and the "real" play, The Real Thing. The boundary between reality and art seems to dissolve further when Stoppard interweaves excerpts from plays by his fictional character Brodie with those by real playwrights John Ford and August Strindberg. These excerpts blur the lines between reality and art by creating stronger connections between the two realms. For instance, the excerpt from House of Cards alerts the audience to the impending breakdown of Henry and Charlotte’s marriage, while the excerpt from Strindberg’s Miss Julie suggests that Annie’s affair, like Miss Julie’s, diminishes her.
The blending of reality and art is amplified through the professions of the characters, who all earn a living by creating fictional stories, whether on stage or in writing. Charlotte, Max, and Annie are accomplished actors. Annie, in particular, is highly skilled at using her acting abilities to conceal her infidelity from Max and later from Henry. Charlotte also acknowledges how her acting influences her personal life. When Max visits her, she humorously asks, "Don’t I get a day off?" Later, she more earnestly claims she is the "victim" of Henry’s "fantasy." Henry, on the other hand, is an expert at merging reality with fiction; he envisions his wife’s possible affair in stage dialogue but finds it difficult to picture such a scenario in real life. Similarly, in House of Cards, the affair is revealed to be entirely fictional. As Charlotte sarcastically observes, "if Henry caught me out with a lover . . . his sentence structure would go to pot, closely followed by his sphincter."
Despite this, reality, no matter how harsh, eventually confronts those who try to ignore it, as Henry learns. Art stops being a refuge for unattainable fantasies and instead becomes a mirror...
(This entire section contains 639 words.)
Unlock this Study Guide Now
Start your 48-hour free trial and get ahead in class. Boost your grades with access to expert answers and top-tier study guides. Thousands of students are already mastering their assignments—don't miss out. Cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
of reality. Stoppard’s recurring scenes (Act I, scenes 1 and 3; Act II, scene 5) indicate that life can uncannily reflect art, underscoring the play’s main theme of Henry’s challenging realization that art and reality are inseparably connected.
Language and Meaning
Stoppard suggests that language and its meanings are open to interpretation. Words themselves are "innocent," yet their effects can be profound. Both Charlotte and Annie occasionally find Henry's constant wordplay overwhelming, especially when it turns sarcastic. His frequent use of irony and sarcasm becomes an abuse of language, as it serves to suppress emotions and create emotional distance—a tendency pointed out by Henry's daughter. Henry's "growth" in the play hinges on his ability to finally articulate emotions using clear, sincere language. As Frank Rich noted in the New York Times, Henry's journey involves trying to "find the language that celebrates love."
Although the play mainly centers on emotional themes, the subplot involving Brodie's play delves deeply into language and meaning. In the penultimate scene of Act II, Stoppard begins with what seems like a trivial exchange. Henry confesses he can't tell apart various classical composers and prefers pop music over opera. Annie is shocked by his indifference to Beethoven, yet she herself can't distinguish between the Everly Brothers and the Andrews Sisters. This seemingly insignificant dialogue is actually quite telling.
Henry's preference for pop music and Annie's love for classical music highlight an ironic contrast to their differing views on writing. Henry values words highly, believing they "build bridges across incomprehension and chaos" and deserve respect. On the other hand, Annie doubts the literary or aesthetic importance of language, considering its true worth to be its impact on the world. However, her viewpoint is compromised when she asks Henry to rewrite Brodie's poorly written script. She acknowledges, albeit unwillingly, that writing must be well-crafted to exert any social or political influence, to, as Henry puts it, "nudge the world a little."
By bringing this debate to light, Stoppard invites the audience to form their own opinions on a topic that remains hotly contested. The audience has witnessed the mastery and impact of Henry's writing and heard Henry and Annie read Brodie's play. This allows them to evaluate Henry and Annie's viewpoints. Should there be a distinction between "good" and "bad" writing, and if so, what should it be based on? They can also compare the writing styles of Henry and Brodie. Which writer is more convincing, and which one elicits more emotion? In this manner, Stoppard engages in a provocative discussion about literature and politics, leaving the question open-ended and encouraging the audience to contemplate the issue independently.
Language and Reality
The Real Thing explores the intricate interplay between language and reality, as well as the nuanced distinction between lofty ideals and the tangible world. Central to the play is Henry, a character who, much like the author Tom Stoppard, is a writer deeply engaged with the power of language. In a revealing interview with Mel Gussow for The New York Times Magazine, Stoppard acknowledged the self-referential humor woven into the narrative, indicating that the play mirrors his own reflections on writing and life.
Henry recognizes the formidable influence that language and the stories it conveys have on shaping human consciousness. He is acutely aware that the way love is discussed—whether as a mere biological impulse as suggested by his daughter, Debbie, or through the poetic lens of romance—affects the reality individuals construct around their relationships. This duality underscores a recurring theme in the play: life and love often mirror the stories people tell themselves.
Ultimately, The Real Thing invites audiences to reflect on the narratives they choose to craft and embrace, illustrating how these narratives impact their perception of reality. Through Henry's journey, Stoppard compels us to consider the profound ways in which language intertwines with life, blurring the boundaries between what is real and what is imagined, between human ideals and the everyday experiences they seek to define.
Romantic Language as Refuge
Human fictions, with their tidy, self-contained worlds, often offer an escape from the tangled complexities of reality. Charlotte’s observation of Henry highlights this notion, describing him as "virginal" because he remains insulated within his realm of words and romantic ideals. To her, Henry's world is a sanctuary, untouched by the rawness of genuine human connection. Initially, his romanticism draws women in, alluring them with its poetic allure. However, as Charlotte and others discover, this enchantment is merely a mask for a deeper indifference.
The narrative of The Real Thing serves as a discourse on the dual nature of romantic language. On one hand, it can be an expansive, creative force, weaving intricate tapestries of imagination and beauty. On the other, it imposes limitations, creating barriers between individuals and the authentic experiences they seek. This dichotomy invites the question: what truly constitutes "the real thing"? Is it the unblemished beauty of romantic ideals or the unscripted and often chaotic reality of human interaction? The story challenges readers to consider whether the refuge offered by romantic language enriches or impoverishes their connection to the world and one another.
Testing Romantic Ideals
Tom Stoppard’s work serves as a profound exploration of the interplay between romantic ideals and the tangible realities of life, reminiscent of the "testing-play" tradition exemplified by William Shakespeare’s As You Like It. In Shakespeare's play, Rosalind challenges Orlando's conventional romantic expressions, which he has learned from texts, by assessing them against his actions. Stoppard adopts a similar motif in his narrative, focusing on the character of Annie and her relationship with Henry.
Annie represents a catalyst for testing romantic rhetoric against real-world actions. She asks Henry to revise Brodie’s play, not merely as an artistic endeavor but as a personal challenge. Annie’s request is an urging for Henry to step beyond the comforts of his intellectual sanctuary and engage with the gritty reality of causes and compromises, simply because it holds significance for her. This demand serves as a critical examination of Henry’s professed commitment, pushing him to prove his dedication not through words alone but through tangible action.
This challenge marks a pivotal moment for Henry, whose previous marriage lacked such depth of connection. In Annie, he recognizes an individual beyond the confines of his constructed image of her, acknowledging her complexity and individuality. His response to her needs reflects a newfound understanding and appreciation of her as a person rather than a mere extension of his romantic ideals. Yet, ironically, it is his romanticism that fortifies his capacity for unselfish acts.
Ultimately, Stoppard suggests that "the real thing"—the essence of genuine romantic connection—emerges neither solely from eloquent expressions nor from actions alone. Rather, it flourishes in the dynamic interaction between the two, where words and deeds continuously influence and reshape one another, forming a bridge between idealism and reality.
Vulgarization of Language
In a broader sense, The Real Thing stands as a sharp critique of the degradation of language and the inevitable decline in the quality of human life that accompanies it. For an artist devoted to the craft of words, language is never merely a tool to achieve a purpose; rather, a dedication to language nurtures a commitment to truthfulness and precision.
