Think of an inciting incident as a kind of jumping off point for a narrative's plot. If you can identify the one moment, early on, that all the subsequent action stems from, you've found the inciting incident.

In the case of the play *Proof* by David Auburn, arguments could be
made for several different moments being the inciting incident. One might argue
that the inciting incident is the death of Catherine's father, Robert, which
occurred before the play begins and is revealed by Catherine's vision of him in
act 1, scene 1. Certainly, his death shakes his daughters to their core, causes
Catherine's sister Claire to come to town, exacerbates Catherine's doubts about
her own mental stability, and leads to the discovery of Robert's brilliant
mathematical proof, in that it allows those left behind to search through his
things for signs of genius among the rambling.

There is also an argument to be made that the inciting incident is when Hal reveals to Catherine that he's been going through her late father's work, early in act 1, as this leads her to give him the key to Robert's desk, in which the titular proof is found.

Finally, as mentioned in the other answer, one could view the act of giving Hal the key as the inciting incident. Even though it comes a bit later in the play, towards the end of act 1, it is a clear turning point in the drama.

The "inciting incident" is the moment or occurrence that starts a problem in a work of literature or play (or in a movie). Up until that point, the audience has been introduced to the backstory, and the "inciting incident" brings up the dilemma that is going to be resolved in the rest of the work.

In the play *Proof,* the inciting incident takes place in Act I,
Scene IV when Catherine, after kissing Hal, gives him the key to her father's
desk. In the desk, Hal finds a proof, and he says, "It looks like it proves a
theorem...a mathematical theorem about prime numbers, something mathematicians
have been trying to prove since...since there were mathematicians, basically."
Hal is not only excited about the proof because it is found after the death of
Robert, Catherine's father and a famous mathematician, but also because the
proof was written at a time when most people assumed Robert was far too
mentally ill to be productive professionally. Just as the curtain drops to
mark the end of Act I, Catherine says of the proof, "I didn't find it. I wrote
it." This marks the inciting incident because there is no real proof that
Catherine wrote the proof, pun intended.

Act II begins with a flashback to Robert and Catherine, and then, in Act II, Scene II, the plot continues to revolve around whether Catherine wrote the proof or not. Hal does not believe that Catherine had the capacity to write the proof, and Claire, Catherine's sister, thinks the handwriting in the proof is her father's. At the end of the play, Catherine says that even though Hal believes that the proof uses several new mathematical techniques that Robert, who was suffering from mental illness, couldn't have known, "it doesn't prove anything." Hal and Catherine begin working on the proof, collaborating, which is the greatest amount of proof Hal and the rest of the world are ever going to get that Catherine is the author of the proof. This process seems to resolve the questions that were brought up in the inciting incident to some degree.

## See eNotes Ad-Free

Start your **48-hour free trial** to get access to more than 30,000 additional guides and more than 350,000 Homework Help questions answered by our experts.

Already a member? Log in here.