Editor's Choice
What was Noel Coward's intended message in Private Lives?
Quick answer:
Noel Coward's Private Lives explores the complexities of modern love and marriage through the tumultuous relationship of Elyot and Amanda, who embody the "can't live with you, can't live without you" dynamic. Coward presents a critique of both the moral escapism of the Lost Generation and the restrictive social norms of the Victorian era. The play suggests that true fulfillment lies in balancing personal freedom with societal expectations, highlighting the paradox of equality in relationships.
Coward's 1930 play Private Lives is a comedy of manners about the love problems of a privileged, upper class couple.
Elyot and Amanda have married and divorced because they were fighting all the time. Each has remarried a younger person. They end up in a hotel in rooms next to each other with their new spouses. The rooms share a terrace.
Back in close proximity, Elyot and Amanda soon fall back in love, but that love means they are fighting all the time. The play is a version of the "I can't live with you, but I can't live without you" love story.
Coward's intention is a to offer a new and modern twist on love and marriage. Elyot and Amanda are clearly equals, breaking the old Victorian/Edwardian mold of subservient and superior gender roles. The early staging of the play emphasized this, showing the couple in mirror image poses, such as when they both face each other smoking a cigarette. Amanda breaks gender conventions by marrying a younger man, which is also a mirror image to Elyot's marrying a younger woman.
Coward thus shows the paradox of equality: it is the spark that holds the twosome together but it also means they are constantly fighting each other with no clear way to resolve their battles. Modern love is not easy, Coward says, but the lead characters wouldn't have it any other way.
As one who lived and wrote during and after the horrors of World War
I, Noel Coward was influenced by artists who became expatriates after
the war in an attempt to escape from the deterioration of society. Officially
referred to as the Lost Generation, writers like Gertrude
Stein and F. Scott Fitzgerald left their home countries to live in France and
other places because they perceived their old, socially constraining ways of
life to be superficial and materialistic, and they instead embraced
lives of immorality and recklessness (Encyclopaedia
Britannica, "Lost Generation").
Coward's play Private Lives satirizes their escapism
and lack of morals through his characters.
The characters Amanda and Elyot embody the expatriates in
France whom Coward was friends with. Their upscale life in France is completely
devoid of any social and moral constraints. They married each other
without a true understanding of what it meant to be married,
and because they had no social and moral constraints, they
very quickly filled their married life full of violent arguments and
jealousies. After their divorce and after they remarried and saw each other
again, their lack of moral constraints quickly led them to abandon their new
spouses and run off with each other. Amanda underscores the
theme of lack of social and moral constraints when, in a discussion
with Victor, she says, "I think very few people are completely normal really,
deep down in their private lives" (Act One). She further adds, "There's no
knowing what one mightn't do" and describes she and Elyot as "two violent acids
bubbling about in a nasty little matrimonial bottle" (Act One).
In contrast to the socially and morally free-floating Amanda and Elyot,
Sibyl and Victor represent classic social constraints
and expectations. They embody the expectations of marriage by wanting
to take care of their spouses. Victor is a classic, strong gentleman, whereas
Sibyl is a classic romantic. Yet, even this adherence to social constraints do
not make the characters happy.
Hence, Coward is showing us that there must be a balance between the
two extremes. While it is wrong to be so without bounds that you are
self-serving and violent, it is also equally wrong to be so constrained by
society that a person does not develop into the person he/she could truly
be.
Get Ahead with eNotes
Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.
Already a member? Log in here.
References