Editor's Choice

What role do armies play in The Prince, according to Machiavelli?

Quick answer:

Machiavelli argues that a prince, in order to be an effective ruler, must always be able to command his own native troops. Otherwise, his principality would never be secure. As mercenaries and auxiliaries would never owe their loyalty directly to the prince, they would therefore prove unreliable as props to his power.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Machiavelli places a great deal of significance on an effective military, claiming in chapter 12 that the "main foundations of all States...are good laws and good arms." Yet he also recognizes that armies can be a disruptive force as well as a crucial bulwark of the power of the state.  For this reason, he advises against the use of mercenaries and especially auxilliaries, who he views as disloyal and self-interested:

Let him, therefore, who would deprive himself of every chance of success, have recourse to auxiliaries...bringing ruin with them ready-made.

The best possible military forces are what he calls "national forces," men who are the actual subjects of the state. They have much more of an interest in fighting, and are more likely to feel an allegiance to the prince. A well-trained, loyal army can be a great source of power for a wise ruler, but a mercenary force, or a disloyal military, can be the source of a state's destruction. Above all, a successful leader must become a good military leader, through both training and study. 

Get Ahead with eNotes

Start your 48-hour free trial to access everything you need to rise to the top of the class. Enjoy expert answers and study guides ad-free and take your learning to the next level.

Get 48 Hours Free Access
Approved by eNotes Editorial