Ideas for Group Discussions
Pride and Prejudice continues to inspire critical inquiry and controversy because of its vivid characters, dramatic plot, and sharply and complexly defined, albeit exclusionary, view of British society of the late eighteenth century. Modern feminists have added their voices to what sometimes appears to be critical din. Some see Elizabeth as actually subversive of the social world she describes. Provocative discussions can center on such claims, using Austen's finely wrought text as basis. Is Jane Austen really against marriage? Is she creating dominant male characters who are from the landed gentry in order to show the oppression of women, or is she in some way supporting what she knows is a flawed system because in the hands of some good characters she believes it can work? Another fertile area is the motivations, morality, sense of social responsibility or lack of it, in the characters, all of whom act as foils for each other in some way. Finally, there is the question of Elizabeth's view of humanity. For someone who sees so much folly and meanness, she is unusually forgiving of her characters. Even the evil ones are usually accommodated rather than punished.
1. It is sometimes assumed that Darcy is full of pride and Elizabeth full of prejudice because these and other characters in the novel claim them to be so. Do you think Elizabeth is in some way also guilty of pride, and Darcy of prejudice?
2. As in all of Austen's novels, the marriage plot makes the nature of marriage a central theme, and the characters debate the issue. Compare the various characters' views of marriage as exhibited in their words and...
(The entire section is 541 words.)